Proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylation induced by 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+)
- Akira T Komatsubara†1, 2,
- Tomoya Asano†3,
- Hiroki Tsumoto4,
- Kazuharu Shimizu4, 5,
- Takumi Nishiuchi3,
- Masanori Yoshizumi1 and
- Kentaro Ozawa†1, 4Email author
© Komatsubara et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 14 September 2012
Accepted: 23 December 2012
Published: 29 December 2012
Nitric oxide (NO) mediates its function through the direct modification of various cellular targets. S-nitrosylation is a post-translational modification of cysteine residues by NO that regulates protein function. Recently, an imbalance of S-nitrosylation has also been linked to neurodegeneration through the impairment of pro-survival proteins by S-nitrosylation.
In the present study, we used two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in conjunction with the modified biotin switch assay for protein S-nitrosothiols using resin-assisted capture (SNO-RAC) to identify proteins that are S-nitrosylated more intensively in neuroblastoma cells treated with a mitochondrial complex I inhibitor, 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+). We identified 14 proteins for which S-nitrosylation was upregulated and seven proteins for which it was downregulated in MPP+-treated neuroblastoma cells. Immunoblot analysis following SNO-RAC confirmed a large increase in the S-nitrosylation of esterase D (ESD), serine-threonine kinase receptor-associated protein (STRAP) and T-complex protein 1 subunit γ (TCP-1 γ) in MPP+-treated neuroblastoma cells, whereas S-nitrosylation of thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 precursor (ERp46) was decreased.
These results suggest that S-nitrosylation resulting from mitochondrial dysfunction can compromise neuronal survival through altering multiple signal transduction pathways and might be a potential therapeutic target for neurodegenerative diseases.
Neurodegenerative diseases, including Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s and Huntington’s disease, occur as a result of the progressive loss of the structure or function of neurons, including the death of neurons. The exact mechanism of neuronal cell death in neurodegeneration is not fully understood, but it is usually accompanied by protein aggregation [1, 2] and increased indices of oxidative stress .
S-nitrosylation is the post-translational modification (PTM) of the thiol group of a cysteine residue by nitric oxide (NO). Recently, this process has been receiving much attention as a mechanism by which NO ubiquitously influences cellular signal transduction, including neurodegeneration . Recent studies have suggested that nitrosative stress due to the generation of excessive NO can mediate excitotoxicity in part by triggering protein misfolding and aggregation via the S-nitrosylation of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI) or the E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin . S-nitrosylation of PDI inhibits the activity of this enzyme, which leads to the accumulation of misfolded proteins, activation of the unfolded protein response, and neuronal cell death triggered by protein misfolding and aggregation . Parkin, mutation of which causes a form of autosomal recessive juvenile Parkinson disease, was also reported to be S-nitrosylated and S-nitrosylation inhibits the E3 ubiquitin ligase activity and protective function of this protein .
S-nitrosylation is also involved in oxidative stress produced by mitochondria, which can subsequently induce neurodegeneration . One of the major sources of oxidative stress in cells is the process of oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria, and NO can mediate excitotoxicity in part by triggering mitochondrial fragmentation via S-nitrosylation, in the absence of genetic predisposition. S-nitrosylation of the mitochondrial fission protein dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) is activated by amyloid-β peptide, which is a key mediator of the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. The resulting hyperactivation of Drp1 leads to excessive mitochondrial fragmentation, the production of oxidative stress, and neuronal cell death .
In different neurodegenerative disorders, the abnormal programmed cell death of neurons has been suggested to be one of the major causes of the degeneration, and the S-nitrosylation of glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) triggers cell death in many types of cell . GAPDH catalyzes the sixth step of glycolysis and thus serves to break down glucose for energy and carbon molecules. However, over the years, there have been reports that GAPDH is implicated in several non-metabolic processes, including the initiation of apoptosis. NO causes the S-nitrosylation of GAPDH, followed by translocating the complex of GAPDH and the E3 ubiquitin ligase Siah to the nucleus and subsequent cell death [9, 10].
In the present study, to investigate the effects of S-nitrosylation on protein function under conditions of mitochondrial dysfunction, we analyzed the level of S-nitrosylated proteins in the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y after exposure to the mitochondrial complex I inhibitor 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium (MPP+). Using the two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE) technique, we identified several protein spots for which the intensity was increased by exposure to MPP+. We then evaluated the S-nitrosylation of several proteins that were identified by immunoblotting after separation by the modified biotin switch assay for protein S-nitrosothiols using resin-assisted capture (SNO-RAC) .
Results and discussion
Purification of S-nitrosylated proteins by SNO-RAC
S-nitrosylation plays important roles in modifying the function of proteins under physiological and pathophysiological conditions , and accurate quantification of the extent of S-nitrosylation at a particular cysteine residue is essential to understand its influence on signal transduction. One method used for quantification is the biotin-switch technique (BST), in which S-nitrosylated cysteines are converted into more stable biotinylated forms . The BST method involves three steps: 1) free cysteine thiols are blocked with S-methylmethanethiosulfonate, 2) nitrosylated cysteines are reduced by ascorbate without the concomitant reduction of disulfide bonds or other oxidative cysteine PTMs, and 3) newly-exposed cysteine thiols are alkylated classically by biotin-HPDP. However, other techniques, such as SNO-RAC, have also been employed to good effect .
Proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylated proteins in SH-SY5Y cells
Identified proteins uniquely increased in MPP + -treated cells compared with control
% Cov (b)
Transmembrane protease, serine 11E precursor/DESC1
Tubulin alpha-6 chain
Transmembrane protease, serine 11E precursor/DESC1
Transmembrane protease, serine 11E precursor/DESC1
Transmembrane protease, serine 11E precursor/DESC1
Tumor necrosis factor ligand superfamily member 10
Tubulin beta-2C chain
Tubulin beta chain
40S ribosomal protein SA/Laminin receptor
Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)
Serine-threonine kinase receptor-associated protein
T-complex protein 1 subunit gamma
Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit beta 2-like 1
S-formylglutathione hydrolase/Esterase D
Thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 precursor/ERp46
Fibrinogen beta chain precursor
Identified proteins uniquely decreased in MPP + -treated cells compared with control
% Cov (b)
Neutral alpha-glucosidase AB precursor
PR domain zinc finger protein 13
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1
Actin, cytoplasmic 2
Elongation factor 1-gamma
Elongation factor 2
Four and a half LIM domain protein 1
Our results suggested S-nitrosylation might play an important role in DNA repair. MPP+-treatment enhanced S-nitrosylation of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which plays an important role in several DNA damage-responsive pathways as well as DNA replication . In additon, PCNA was reported to be associated with Parkin , suggesting S-nitrosylation of PCNA might involve the regulation of DNA repair caused by mitochondrial dysfunction. Furthermore, MPP+-treatment enhanced S-nitrosylation of STRAP, which activates p53 by removing Mdm2, a negative regulator of p53 , suggesting S-nitrosylation of STRAP might regulate DNA repair through the activation of p53.
S-nitrosylation of the α- and β-subunit of tubulin, which have been reported to be S-nitrosylated previously , was upregulated in MPP+-treated neuroblastoma cells, which suggested that our experiment detected S-nitrosylated proteins. In a previous report, S-nitrosylation of the α- and β-subunit of tubulin was shown to regulate their polymerization by regulating the formation of inter- and intramolecular disulfide bonds .
Detection of S-nitrosylated proteins in SH-SY5Y cells
To confirm the results of the 2DE, S-nitrosylation of esterase D (ESD), serine-threonine kinase receptor-associated protein (STRAP), T-complex protein 1 subunit γ (TCP-1 γ), and thioredoxin domain-containing protein 5 precursor (ERp46) were analyzed. ESD, which is also known as S-formylglutathione hydrolase (FGH), constitutes part of a formaldehyde detoxification pathway by catalyzing the hydrolysis of S-formylglutathione to formic acid and glutathione . ESD was first purified from human tissues, in which polymorphisms in its expression were associated with several diseases, including retinoblastoma  and Wilson’s disease . STRAP is a transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) receptor-interacting protein that inhibits TGF-β signaling by stabilizing the association between TGF-β receptors and SMAD7 [22, 23]. TCP-1 γ is a molecular chaperone that is a member of the chaperonin-containing TCP1 complex (CCT), which is also known as the TCP1 ring complex (TRiC) . ERp46 has a PDI domain that exhibits a high sequence similarity to thioredoxin, which catalyzes the rate limiting reaction of disulphide bond formation, isomerization, and reduction .
In the present study, we used a combination of 2DE and SNO-RAC to identify S-nitrosylated proteins that had been modified more intensively than others upon exposure to MPP+. We confirmed that ESD, STRAP and TCP-1 were S-nitrosylated markedly upon MPP+ treatment, whereas S-nitrosylation of ERp46 decreased. Our observations provided clear evidence that MPP+ treatment changed the level of S-nitrosylation on several proteins, which were involved in multiple signal transduction pathways. This suggests that the neurotoxicity of MPP+ is effected through multiple pathways and S-nitrosylation might play an important role in this process. It is likely that application of the experimental approach described in the present study in other cell and biological systems will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the precise role of S-nitrosylation in the stress response or the pathogenesis of diseases.
Materials and methods
Sequencing-grade trypsin was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI). The protease inhibitor cocktail was obtained from Roche Applied Science (Switzerland). IPG buffer was purchased from GE Healthcare, and ZipTipC18 columns from Millipore, respectively. Anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody and 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
Transfection of the expression constructs were performed using lipofectamine LTX (Invitrogen).
Purification of S-nitrosylated proteins by SNO-RAC
S-nitrosylated proteins were purified by using SNO-RAC  with some modifications. Briefly, SNO-RAC Resins were prepared as described. Then, lysates (250 ml diluted with 750 ml HEN buffer containing 250 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM neocuproine [pH 8.0]) were incubated with SDS (1% final concentration) and methyl methanethiosulfonate (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO) at 50°C for 25 min. Proteins were precipitated with acetone, washed three times, resuspended in HENS buffer (HEN containing 1% SDS; 200 ml). This material is added to 50 μl resin slurry in the presence of sodium ascorbate (Fluka, final 20 mM). Following rotation in the dark for 3 h, the resin was washed with 4 x 1 ml HENS buffer. Captured proteins are eluted with 30 ml HENS buffer containing 100 mM 2- mercaptoethanol for 20 min at RT, precipitated with acetone and resuspended in sample buffer (4 M urea, 2%(w/v) CHAPS, 10 mg/ml DTT and 1%(v/v) PharmalyteTM) .
Separation by 2D-gel electrophoresis
2DE was carried out as reported previously . In brief, for isoelectric focusing (IEF), samples were loaded onto rehydration strips that were 18 cm in length with an immobilized pH gradient from 3 to 10 and separated on a MultiPhor Unit (GE Healthcare). After the first separation, the strips were equilibrated in equilibration buffer A [50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 6 M urea, 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 1% DTT, 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue] and then in equilibration buffer B [50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.8, 6 M urea, 30% (v/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) SDS, 2.5% iodoacetamide, 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue] for 15 min. Separation in the second dimension was achieved using a Hoefer SE 600 Ruby electrophoresis system (GE Healthcare) and 10% polyacrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Figure 1). The experiments were performed twice and the similar images were obtained.
After staining, gels were scanned and analyzed by ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) to detect, subtract background of, normalize, and quantify the spots in images from a single 2D-gel. Our quantitation analysis revealed the signal intensities of 14 spots were ≥1.5-fold higher (i.e., increase in protein expression) and signal intensities of 7 spots were 2/3-fold lower (i.e., decrease in protein expression) in the MPP+-treated sample compared to their respective spots in the wild-type sample.
Identification of proteins
Proteins were identified as described previously . MS/MS analysis was performed with a 4800 plus MALDI TOF/TOFTM Analyzer (ABsciex, California, USA), and proteins were identified by using the ParagonTM algorithm  of the Protein PilotTM software (ABsciex, California, USA). For each protein identification, total ProtScore were used. The total ProtScore is a measurement of all the peptide evidence for a protein and is analogous to protein scores reported by other protein identification software. Basically proteins whose ProtScores were higher than 1.0 were listed in Tables 1 and 2, but Transmembrane protease, serine 11E precursor/DESC1 with lower ProtScore was anomalistically included in the Table 1 because DESC1 was identified from several spots. Cellular localizations and biological processes of proteins identified by MIS were categorized using Scaffold version 3.0 (Proteome Software, Portland, OR).
Cell lysates were prepared using a Qproteome Mammalian Protein Prep Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Samples were analyzed by western blotting. After transfer to PVDF membranes, immunoreactive bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence detection system and indicated antibodies as described previously .
Sma- and mad-related protein
Immobilized pH gradient
This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through its Funding Program for World-Leading Innovative R&D on Science and Technology (FIRST Program), by the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Technology (MEXT) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research 08107960 and 09153695, and by Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Welfare Foundation.
- Bence NF, Sampat RM, Kopito RR: Impairment of the ubiquitin-proteasome system by protein aggregation. Science 2001, 292: 1552–1555. 10.1126/science.292.5521.1552View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Muchowski PJ, Wacker JL: Modulation of neurodegeneration by molecular chaperones. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6: 11–22. 10.1038/nrn1587View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tsang AH, Chung KK: Oxidative and nitrosative stress in Parkinson’s disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009, 1792: 643–650. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2008.12.006View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hess DT, Matsumoto A, Kim SO, Marshall HE, Stamler JS: Protein S-nitrosylation: purview and parameters. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005, 6: 150–166. 10.1038/nrm1569View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura T, Lipton SA: Cell death: protein misfolding and neurodegenerative diseases. Apoptosis 2009, 14: 455–468. 10.1007/s10495-008-0301-yView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Uehara T, Nakamura T, Yao D, Shi ZQ, Gu Z, Ma Y, Masliah E, Nomura Y, Lipton SA: S-nitrosylated protein-disulphide isomerase links protein misfolding to neurodegeneration. Nature 2006, 441: 513–517. 10.1038/nature04782View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chung KK, Thomas B, Li X, Pletnikova O, Troncoso JC, Marsh L, Dawson VL, Dawson TM: S-nitrosylation of parkin regulates ubiquitination and compromises parkin’s protective function. Science 2004, 304: 1328–1331. 10.1126/science.1093891View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cho DH, Nakamura T, Fang J, Cieplak P, Godzik A, Gu Z, Lipton SA: S-nitrosylation of Drp1 mediates b-amyloid-related mitochondrial fission and neuronal injury. Science 2009, 324: 102–105. 10.1126/science.1171091View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hara MR, Agrawal N, Kim SF, Cascio MB, Fujimuro M, Ozeki Y, Takahashi M, Cheah JH, Tankou SK, Hester LD, Ferris CD, Hayward SD, Snyder SH, Sawa A: S-nitrosylated GAPDH initiates apoptotic cell death by nuclear translocation following Siah1 binding. Nat Cell Biol 2005, 7: 665–674. 10.1038/ncb1268View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hara MR, Snyder SH: Nitric oxide-GAPDH-Siah: a novel cell death cascade. Cell Mol Neurobiol 2006, 26: 527–538.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Forrester MT, Thompson JW, Foster MW, Nogueira L, Moseley MA, Stamler JS: Proteomic analysis of S-nitrosylation and denitrosylation by resin-assisted capture. Nat Biotechnol 2009, 27: 557–559. 10.1038/nbt.1545View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jaffrey SR, Erdjument-Bromage H, Ferris CD, Tempst P, Snyder SH: Protein S-nitrosylation: a physiological signal for neuronal nitric oxide. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3: 193–197. 10.1038/35055104View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozawa K, Whalen EJ, Nelson CD, Mu Y, Hess DT, Lefkowitz RJ, Stamler JS: S-nitrosylation of b-arrestin regulates b-adrenergic receptor trafficking. Mol Cell 2008, 31: 395–405. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.05.024View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Moldovan GL, Pfander B, Jentsch S: PCNA, the maestro of the replication fork. Cell 2007, 129: 665–679. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.003View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kao SY: Regulation of DNA repair by parkin. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009, 382: 321–325. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.03.048View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Jung H, Seong HA, Ha H: NM23-H1 tumor suppressor and its interacting partner STRAP activate p53 function. J Biol Chem 2007, 282: 35293–35307. 10.1074/jbc.M705181200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hara MR, Thomas B, Cascio MB, Bae BI, Hester LD, Dawson VL, Dawson TM, Sawa A, Snyder SH: Neuroprotection by pharmacologic blockade of the GAPDH death cascade. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103: 3887–3889. 10.1073/pnas.0511321103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Landino LM, Koumas MT, Mason CE, Alston JA: Modification of tubulin cysteines by nitric oxide and nitroxyl donors alters tubulin polymerization activity. Chem Res Toxicol 2007, 20: 1693–1700. 10.1021/tx7001492View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Harms N, Ras J, Reijnders WN, van Spanning RJ, Stouthamer AH: S-formylglutathione hydrolase of Paracoccus denitrificans is homologous to human esterase D: a universal pathway for formaldehyde detoxification? J Bacteriol 1996, 178: 6296–6299.Google Scholar
- Lee WH, Bookstein R, Hong F, Young LJ, Shew JY, Lee EY: Human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene: cloning, identification, and sequence. Science 1987, 235: 1394–1399. 10.1126/science.3823889View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Frydman M, Bonné-Tamir B, Farrer LA, Conneally PM, Magazanik A, Ashbel S, Goldwitch Z: Assignment of the gene for Wilson disease to chromosome 13: linkage to the esterase D locus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985, 82: 1819–1821. 10.1073/pnas.82.6.1819View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Datta PK, Chytil A, Gorska AE, Moses HL: Identification of STRAP, a novel WD domain protein in transforming growth factor-b signaling. J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 34671–34674. 10.1074/jbc.273.52.34671View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Datta PK, Moses HL: STRAP and Smad7 synergize in the inhibition of transforming growth factor b signaling. Mol Cell Biol 2000, 20: 3157–3167. 10.1128/MCB.20.9.3157-3167.2000View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kubota H, Hynes G, Carne A, Ashworth A, Willison K: Identification of six Tcp-1-related genes encoding divergent subunits of the TCP-1-containing chaperonin. Curr Biol 1994, 4: 89–99. 10.1016/S0960-9822(94)00024-2View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Knoblach B, Keller BO, Groenendyk J, Aldred S, Zheng J, Lemire BD, Li L, Michalak M: ERp19 and ERp46, new members of the thioredoxin family of endoplasmic reticulum proteins. Mol Cell Proteomics 2003, 2: 1104–1119. 10.1074/mcp.M300053-MCP200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Asano T, Nishiuchi T: Comparative analysis of phosphoprotein expression using 2D-DIGE. Methods Mol Biol 2011, 744: 225–233. 10.1007/978-1-61779-123-9_16View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shilov IV, Seymour SL, Patel AA, Loboda A, Tang WH, Keating SP, Hunter CL, Nuwaysir LM, Schaeffer DA: The Paragon Algorithm, a next generation search engine that uses sequence temperature values and feature probabilities to identify peptides from tandem mass spectra. Mol Cell Proteomics 2007, 6: 1638–1655. 10.1074/mcp.T600050-MCP200View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ozawa K, Tsumoto H, Wei W, Tang CH, Komatsubara AT, Kawafune H, Shimizu K, Liu L, Tsujimoto G: Proteomic analysis of the role of S-nitrosoglutathione reductase in lipopolysaccharide-challenged mice. Proteomics 2012, 12: 2024–2035. 10.1002/pmic.201100666View ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.