Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of programs for the detection of repetitive subsequences in proteins

From: Surface antigens and potential virulence factors from parasites detected by comparative genomics of perfect amino acid repeats

Program

Method used

Detection of degenerate repeats

Calculation of a P-Value

Analysis of whole Proteomes

%Hits found in SwissProt

Detection of T. brucei procyclin 1

Reptile

Hashing2

No

Yes

Yes

153

Yes

REP [2]

Profiles of known repeats

Yes

No

No

1.1

No

RADAR [5]

Alignment

Yes

No

No

28

Yes

REPRO [7]

Alignment

Yes

No

No

n.a.

Yes

Internal Repeats finder [8]

Alignment

Yes

Yes

No

14

No

TRIPS [9]

Fourier transform

Yes

No

No

12

No

RepSeq [10]

Hashing

Yes

Yes

Yes

n.a.

Yes

ProtRepeatsDB [11]

Mixed

Yes

Yes

Yes

n.a.

Yes

Repper [12]

Fourier transform

Yes

No

No

n.a.

No

  1. 1The T. brucei surface protein (GenBank accession AAK62893) with five GPEET repeats [25] was used for benchmarking.
  2. 2Word count using a hash table.
  3. 3Using P < 0.001 (same as for Internal Repeats Finder).