From: Improving Detection Accuracy of Lung Cancer Serum Proteomic Profiling via Two-Stage Training Process
Training population | Training set | Test set | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | Accuracy (%) |
Single-stage decision tree | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
(A) Lung cancer + Healthy control & Inflammatory disease | 81.7 (58/71) | 85.7 (54/63) | 83.6 (112/134) | 87.2 (41/47) | 37.5* (15/40) | 64.4 (56/87) |
(B) Lung cancer + Health control | 88.7 (63/71) | 89.1 (41/46) | 88.9 (104/117) | 83.0 (39/47) | 84.6 (22/26) | 83.6 (61/73) |
(C) Lung cancer + Inflammatory disease | 94.4 (67/71) | 70.6 (12/17) | 89.8 (79/88) | 85.1 (40/47) | 57.1 (8/14) | 78.7 (48/61) |
Two-stage decision tree | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
 | 80.3 (57/71) | 88.8 (56/63) | 84.3 (113/134) | 70.1 (33/47) | 80.0* (32/40) | 74.7 (65/87) |