Skip to main content

Table 2 Significantly expressed proteins - Kruskal-Wallis result

From: A guide through the computational analysis of isotope-labeled mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics data: an application study

Accession

ANOVA

adjusted p-values

Fligner-Killeen

adjusted p-values

Shapiro-Wilks

adjusted p-values

Kruskal-Wallis

adjusted p-values

Number of identified

peptide hits

P40780

<0.000001

>0.99

>0.99

<0.000001

741

P24327

0.000234

>0.99

<0.000001

<0.000001

1692

O32076

<0.000001

0.000083

>0.99

<0.000001

1344

P24141

0.000001

>0.99

<0.000001

<0.000001

1257

O34538

<0.000001

0.000020

0.977644

<0.000001

1616

P54535

0.000073

>0.99

<0.000001

<0.000001

2391

P54466

<0.000001

0.003793

<0.000001

<0.000001

2382

P02968

<0.000001

0.000001

<0.000001

<0.000001

9369

O31501

0.000036

0.006965

<0.000001

<0.000001

1681

P46920

<0.000001

>0.99

<0.000001

<0.000001

1149

O34966

<0.000001

0.012613

0.000188

<0.000001

1837

P35136

<0.000001

>0.99

0.000003

<0.000001

1498

P37808

<0.000001

>0.99

>0.99

<0.000001

1219

P94356

<0.000001

0.037934

0.414572

<0.000001

2053

P27206

<0.000001

0.000004

0.000028

<0.000001

2232

P37871

<0.000001

0.399160

0.901907

<0.000001

1938

O34992

<0.000001

0.085647

<0.000001

<0.000001

1215

P37476

<0.000001

>0.99

<0.000001

<0.000001

3203

Q04747

<0.000001

<0.000001

0.000199

<0.000001

3460

P08750

<0.000001

>0.99

<0.000001

<0.000001

1109

P33166

<0.000001

<0.000001

0.067524

<0.000001

1605

P08065

<0.000001

0.328408

<0.000001

<0.000001

2140

P09124

<0.000001

>0.99

>0.99

<0.000001

685

P37809

<0.000001

0.000002

0.007523

<0.000001

1112

O34833

<0.000001

0.007364

<0.000001

0.000001

827

P80877

<0.000001

>0.99

>0.99

0.000002

892

P20166

0.000046

0.272716

0.044373

0.000003

1948

P94565

<0.000001

>0.99

0.264667

0.000003

1033

P19582

<0.000001

>0.99

0.011528

0.000008

903

O31709

<0.000001

>0.99

>0.99

0.000020

295

O32167

0.000020

>0.99

0.001374

0.000021

2891

P25994

0.000001

0.755894

0.006728

0.000072

1641

P71044

0.002703

>0.99

0.000005

0.000284

635

P21464

0.000613

>0.99

<0.000001

0.000473

1272

O32243

0.000003

0.599332

>0.99

0.000505

404

O34442

<0.000001

>0.99

0.047638

0.000552

291

P35149

<0.000001

0.000169

>0.99

0.000693

751

O32157

0.000035

0.016583

<0.000001

0.000796

957

P21467

0.015346

>0.99

0.000001

0.001040

781

P39912

0.000327

>0.99

>0.99

0.002252

878

P23446

>0.99

>0.99

<0.000001

0.002510

451

P49785

0.039250

>0.99

0.000245

0.002557

536

O31567

0.001315

>0.99

0.000289

0.002616

613

P46922

0.069376

>0.99

0.000162

0.002782

581

Q01625

0.190501

>0.99

<0.000001

0.003031

325

P54537

>0.99

>0.99

<0.000001

0.004345

471

P71070

0.417433

>0.99

0.000001

0.009605

314

Q9KWU4

0.280189

>0.99

0.000448

0.009979

807

O06745

0.000005

>0.99

0.013199

0.011193

485

O35007

0.002474

>0.99

>0.99

0.011411

410

O05252

0.111360

0.104107

0.601796

0.017767

835

O32218

0.009165

>0.99

>0.99

0.018027

567

O34633

0.000185

>0.99

>0.99

0.025892

433

P94421

>0.99

>0.99

<0.000001

0.027798

509

O32247

0.025031

>0.99

>0.99

0.028009

845

P42971

0.000473

>0.99

>0.99

0.032372

475

P23447

0.078522

>0.99

0.721913

0.036485

459

P09339

0.000203

0.244699

>0.99

0.040871

619

P37870

0.017921

0.000748

>0.99

0.041718

1113

O32047

0.178170

>0.99

<0.000001

0.042466

665

P12042

0.002703

>0.99

>0.99

0.043005

699

P32399

0.000267

>0.99

>0.99

0.045315

388

P08066

0.105333

>0.99

0.000002

0.048719

644

P40779

0.083444

>0.99

0.053914

0.049061

409

  1. Exemplary shown for experiment A, the table displays all significantly expressed proteins (p < 0.05, p-value adjustment using Holm) reported by a Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test (further results can be found in the supplementary data). Proteins are sorted by the Kruskal-Wallis' p-value in ascending order. In summary, 64 proteins were found with a significant change in their abundance. By comparison, 52 of them were also reported as significant by the ANOVA (not significant printed in italics).