Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of ERS-GA with HHGA in free energy obtained (Mean/Best) and average running time.

From: An effective hybrid of hill climbing and genetic algorithm for 2D triangular protein structure prediction

Seq.

Len.

Label

ERS-GA

HHGA

Conformation

1

20

Mean/Best

-12.5/-15

-14.73/-15

Fig. 6(a)

  

Avg. Run Time

24.24

273.23

 

2

24

Mean/Best

-10.2/-13

-14.93/-17

Fig. 6(b)

  

Avg. Run Time

65.78

378.99

 

3

25

Mean/Best

-8.47/-12

-11.57/-12

Fig. 6(c)

  

Avg. Run Time

70.52

403.84

 

4

36

Mean/Best

-16.17/-20

-21.27/-23

Fig. 6(d)

  

Avg. Run Time

135.68

713.55

 

5

48

Mean/Best

-28.13/-32

-37.3/-41

Fig. 6(e)

  

Avg. Run Time

246.71

1173.2

 

6

50

Mean/Best

-25.3/-30

34.1/-38

Fig. 6(f)

  

Avg. Run Time

254.67

1246.1

 

7

60

Mean/Best

-49.43/-55

-61.83/-66

Fig. 6(g)

  

Avg. Run Time

366.38

1878.3

 

8

64

Mean/Best

-42.37/-47

-56.53/-63

Fig. 6(h)

  

Avg. Run Time

423.13

1944.7

 
  1. Figures in bold indicate the lowest energy.