Skip to main content
Download PDF

PRM-based quantitative proteomics analysis of altered HSP abundance in villi and decidua of patients with early missed abortion

Proteome Science volume 21, Article number: 12 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Objective

In this study, we aimed to identify differentially expressed heat shock protein (HSP) profiles in the villi and decidua from patients with early missed abortion (EMA).

Methods

By using high-throughput and high-precision parallel reaction monitoring (PRM)-based targeted proteomics techniques, this study examined the abundance of HSPs in the villi and decidua of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls. Moreover, the abundance of 3 HSPs in the villi of another 22 patients with EMA and 22 controls was verified with Western blotting and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Results

There were potential differences in the abundance of 16 HSPs and 42 polypeptides in human villi and decidua compared with those of the control group. Among them, HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 were downregulated in abundance in villi of patients with EMA, with a statistically significant difference, which was consistent with the verification results of Western blots and IHC.

Conclusion

Using a PRM-based targeted proteomics technique, this study is the first to screen and quantitatively analyze the expression profile of HSPs in the villi and decidua of patients with EMA. The significant downregulation of HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 was found to have a potentially intimate association with the occurrence of EMA. The findings in our study may provide novel potential research targets related to HSPs for the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of EMA.

Introduction

Early missed abortion (EMA) refers to the phenomenon where an embryo or fetus has died and is retained in the uterine cavity and fails to expel spontaneously during pregnancy ≤ 12 weeks [1]. Although there are many causes of missed abortion, such as maternal endocrine dysfunction, immune dysfunction, reproductive organ anatomical abnormalities and diseases, systemic diseases and infections, chromosomal abnormalities, etc., the etiologies of more than half of cases of missed abortions remain unknown. Therefore, studies on the pathogenesis of missed abortions can pave the way for new research into the prevention and treatment of EMA.

As molecular chaperones, HSPs, which have been widely found at the maternal–embryonic interface, play an important role in protein folding/unfolding, cell cycle regulation and cellular protection [2, 3]. Recently, according to systematic gene symbols, Kampinga et al., divided the human HSP family into the following major classes: HSPA (HSP70), HSPC (HSP90), HSPD/E (HSP60/HSP10) and CCT (TRiC), HSPH (HSP110), DNAJ (HSP40) and HSPB (small HSP) [4]. Accumulating evidence suggests that HSPs promote decidualization, implantation and placentation, with dysregulated expression resulting in implantation failure, pregnancy loss and other maternal–fetal complications [3]. For example, HSP27 promotes decidualization [5], HSP105 facilitates placental implantation [6], and altered abundance of Hsp70 may lead to the occurrence of abortion [7,8,9]. Therefore, we believe that systematic evaluation of HSP abundance in EMA may lead to new molecular targets.

In our study, a PRM-based targeted proteomics technique was used to detect the differential abundance of HSPs at the proteomic level. This method successfully identified the differential abundance of HSPs during malignant melanoma metastasis and revealed that DNAJB4 is a suppressor of melanoma metastasis [10]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that altered abundance of HSP70, HSP40, and HSPB8 may be associated with radio-resistance development in breast cancer [11]. In this paper, a quantitative analysis was conducted for 42 peptides of 16 target proteins in villi and decidua from 10 patients with EMA and 10 healthy controls to find new molecular targets.

Materials and methods

Patients and controls

A total of 32 pregnant women who underwent complete curettage of the uterine cavity in Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital from January 2020 to December 2020 were enrolled in the case group, and 32 healthy women who voluntarily requested induced abortion due to unintended pregnancy during the corresponding gestational period were enrolled in the control group. In the diagnosis of missed abortion, transvaginal ultrasonography is primarily relied upon to detect empty gestational sacs or embryos/fetuses without cardiovascular beats. All included pregnant women had been screened for fetal chromosomal abnormalities, endocrine diseases, anatomical abnormalities, infections, immune diseases, trauma and medical diseases. All participants were also within 6–10 weeks of gestation and had no history of adverse pregnancy. The embryonic villous tissue and maternal decidual tissue were collected respectively during vacuum aspiration under intravenous anesthesia. All samples were immediately processed in liquid nitrogen and then stored in a -80 °C refrigerator. Ten villus and decidual samples in the EMA group and the control group were selected for PRM-based targeted proteomic analysis (see Table 1 for clinical baseline characteristics of the two groups). Based on the PRM results, Western blotting and immunohistochemistry were performed on another 22 villus samples from the EMA group and the control group. Compared with those of the control group, the clinical parameters of another 22 cases also showed no significant differences in maternal age, BMI, pregnancy duration, gravidity, parity and induced abortion. This study was supported by the Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital. All the studies provided informed consent.

Table 1 Comparison of clinical parameters of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls that underwent HSP expression profiling
Full size table

Protein extraction and enzymatic hydrolysis

After an appropriate amount of SDT lysis solution was added, the sample was transferred to a 2 ml centrifuge tube preloaded with arenaceous quartz and a 1/4-inch ceramic bead MP 6540–424. Homogenization processing was performed using an MP homogenizer (24 × 2, 6.0 M/S, 60 s, twice). In the subsequent steps, the samples underwent an ultrasonic treatment (180 W for 10 s with intervals of 10 s for a total of ten cycles) and were boiled in a water bath for ten minutes. The supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12,000 × g for 30 min and filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane to obtain the filtrate. Protein quantification was performed using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method, and 20 μg of protein from each sample was used for SDS‒PAGE electrophoresis. The areas of degradation were observed as distinct bands against a blue-stained background after Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 protein staining. The sample was subpackaged and stored at -80 °C for preservation.

Following enzymatic hydrolysis with FASP, the resulting peptide was subjected to C18 cartridge desalting. The lyophilized peptides were then reconstituted in a 40 µl solution of 0.1% formic acid and quantified using an enzyme-labeled assay.

Mass spectrometry analysis

A peptide mixture from the sample was prepared, and 1 μg was subjected to chromatographic separation using an HPLC system. Buffer solution A consisted of a 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution, while solution B comprised a 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile aqueous solution (84% acetonitrile). The column was equilibrated with 95% solvent A. The samples were separated via a gradient chromatography column. After high-performance liquid chromatography was conducted, a Q-Exactive HF mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) was utilized to perform qualitative analysis via mass spectrometry. The analysis duration was 60 min, and the positive ion detection method was utilized. The scanning range of the parent ion was set at 300–1800 m/z. The primary mass spectrometry resolution reached 60,000 atm/z200. The AGC target was set to 3e6, and the primary maximum IT was limited to 50 ms. The collection of peptides' secondary mass spectrometry was conducted using the following methods: 20 MS2 scans were triggered after each full scan, with a resolution of 15,000 at m/z200 and an AGC target of 1e5. The maximum IT for secondary mass spectrometry was set to 50 ms. HCD was used as the MS2 activation type, with an isolation window of 1.6Th and normalized collision energy set to 27.

The original mass spectrum data were obtained using Proteome Discoverer v.2.2, with database search parameters set to trypsin/P enzyme and 0 missed cleavages. Peptides scoring above 40 were considered reliable, and 1–3 unique peptides were selected for each protein.

Based on the results of protein qualitative analysis, trusted peptides suitable for PRM analysis were imported into Xcalibur mass spectrometry software for PRM method setting. The peptide mixture of 10 µg was subjected to quantitative analysis using both "full scan" and "PRM" modes. The chromatographic separation and full scanning conditions were consistent with those described above. Subsequently, the mass spectrum data were analyzed utilizing Skyline software to determine the availability of selected peptides based on their repeatability and stability.

PRM detection analysis

The peptide information suitable for PRM analysis mentioned above was imported into Xcalibur software to set up the PRM method. For detection, approximately 1 µg of peptide was taken from each sample, and 20 fmol standard peptide (PRTC: ELGQSGVDTYLQTK) was added. LC-PRM/MS was used with the aforementioned PRM method to detect the target protein in each sample. The original PRM files were analyzed using Skyline 3.5.0, and after a correction was performed for the internal standard peptide signal, the expression level of the target protein in each sample was determined.

Western blotting validation

Twenty micrograms of the extracted villus protein sample was separated by SDS‒PAGE, transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane and sealed with 5% defatted milk powder for 1 h. The membrane was incubated with diluted primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The membrane was incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h. The horseradish peroxidase (HRP) signal was detected using hypersensitive enhanced chemical luminescence (ECL) chemical reagent. The target protein bands were analyzed in ImageJ.

Human HSP90AB1 antibody (Boster, Wuhan, China, no. BM4191, 1:2000 dilution), human HSPD1 antibody (Boster, Wuhan, China, no. M01280-3, 1:2000 dilution) and human HSPA13 antibody (Proteintech, Wuhan, China, no. 12667–2-AP, 1:2000 dilution) were used as the primary antibodies for Western blot analysis. The membranes were also incubated with anti-GAPDH antibody (ZSGB-Bio, no. TA-08, 1:10,000 dilution) to verify equal protein loading.

Immunohistochemistry validation

The paraffin-embedded villus tissue sections were dewaxed and dehydrated as per routine practice. Citric acid antigen repair buffer was used for antigen repair. For blocking of endogenous peroxidase, the slices were incubated in 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) at room temperature for 25 min. The tissue sections were sealed with 3% BSA at room temperature for 30 min and then incubated with 50 μl of diluted primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The primary antibody was anti-HSP90AB1 (Boster, Wuhan, China, no. BM4191, 1:200 dilution), anti-HSPD1 (Boster, Wuhan, China, no. M012803, 1:200 dilution) and anti-HSPA13 (Proteintech, Wuhan, China, no. 12667–2-AP, 1:200 dilution). The slices were incubated with the secondary antibodies of the corresponding species of the primary antibody at room temperature for 50 min. Finally, fresh DAB display solution was added to the slices, the color development time was controlled under the microscope, and the positive color was brownish yellow. All sections were analyzed through a modified H-score scoring system [(percentage of weak intensity area × 1) + (percentage of moderate intensity area × 2) + (percentage of strong intensity area × 3)] by two pathologists blinded to the clinical and molecular data. The H-score is a value between 0 and 300, and the larger the value is, the stronger the comprehensive positive intensity [12].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software was used for statistical analysis, and all data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t test was used for comparison of quantitative data between the two groups, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Enumeration data is chi-square test. All experiments were repeated three times.

Results

Differentially expressed protein identification

Using PRM-based targeted proteomics, we successfully identified the differentially abundant HSPs in villi and decidua of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls (Fig. 1). A total of 16 differentially expressed HSPs with 42 polypeptides in total were quantified (Tables 2, 3, 4 and 5). Among them, the abundances of HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 in the villi of the EMA group were decreased compared with those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (all P < 0.05); however, these HSPs were not significantly changed in decidual tissues (P > 0.05).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Workflow of preordered LC-PRM analysis for quantitative evaluation of heat shock proteome in villi and decidua of 10 patients with EMA and 10 Controls. All experiments were performed in triplicate

Full size image
Table 2 Quantitative and statistical analysis of target peptide in decidua of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls identified using PRM-based targeted proteomics
Full size table
Table 3 Quantitative and statistical analysis of target peptide in villi of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls identified using PRM-based targeted proteomics
Full size table
Table 4 Differentially expressed HSPs proteins in decidua of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls identified using PRM-based targeted proteomics
Full size table
Table 5 Differentially expressed HSPs proteins in villi of 10 patients with EMA and 10 controls identified using PRM-based targeted proteomics
Full size table

Western blotting validation of PRM-based results

The Western blotting results showed that the abundance levels of HSP90AB1, HSPD1, and HSPA13 were decreased in 22 cases of EMA villi, with statistically significant differences compared to the control group (Fig. 2). The above results were consistent with those verified by the PRM-based method.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The differential abundance of HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 in villi tissues was verified by Western blot. A The representative of Western blot analysis to verify selected differentially expressed proteins HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 in the villi tissue of embryo from EMA (n = 6) and control(n = 6). B The scatter plot of HSP90AB1 abundance in the villi tissue of embryo from EMA (n = 22) vs control (n = 22) (P < 0.01). C The scatter plot of HSPD1 abundance in the villi tissue of embryo from EMA (n = 22) vs control (n = 22) (P < 0.01). D The scatter plot of HSPA13 abundance in the villi tissue of embryo from EMA (n = 22) vs control (n = 22) (P < 0.01)

Full size image

Immunohistochemistry validation of PRM-based results

Further analysis was conducted on the 3 candidate biomarkers HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 using IHC. Through staining, it was found that the levels of HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 in the villi of 22 cases of EMA were significantly lower than those in the control group (Fig. 3), which was consistent with the abundance trends detected by the PRM-based method.

Fig. 3
figure 3

A, B, C Immunohistochemical staining for HSP90AB1, HSPD1, and HSPA13 observed in the cytoplasm of syncytiotrophoblast and cytotrophoblast cells (× 200, × 400). Villus from 22 patients with EMA showed lower; D-F Quantitative scoring results of IHC analyses w shown as box plots

Full size image

Discussion

PRM is a targeted mass spectrometry technique where a new-generation mass spectrometer with high resolution and high precision is used for ion monitoring of the target protein or peptide fragment to realize accurate quantification of the target protein/peptide fragment. In this study, a targeted quantitative proteomics method based on PRM was used to comprehensively analyze the differential abundance of heat shock proteins in EMA tissues. We observed some differences in the abundance of 16 target proteins in human villus and decidual tissues. Specifically, the levels of HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 were decreased in EMA villus tissues with significant differences, which was consistent with the results of Western blot and IHC verification. However, there were no statistically significant changes in these HSPs in decidual tissue, which may be related to the small size of our sample, and these results need to be further confirmed by expanding the sample size; on the other hand, these HSPs may only have changes in expression in villi. Cui et al. [13]. utilized proteomics to investigate factors related to early embryonic development and employed iTRAQ technology to compare protein profiles of serum samples from patients with normal pregnancies and cases of early recurrent spontaneous abortion (ERSA). Through this comparison, they identified 78 differentially expressed proteins. Furthermore, PRM technology was employed to validate three proteins—CD45, PSG1, and Prdx-2—which were found to be closely associated with miscarriage. There are some distinctions between their study and ours. First, we employed distinct clinical samples, focusing on human embryonic chorionic villus and maternal decidua tissues, while they utilized human serum samples. Moreover, we specifically investigated the differential abundance of HSP in the specimens, whereas they examined the differential abundance of all proteins in the specimens. In summary, our findings might provide important evidence for further research into the complex pathophysiological mechanism of EMA.

As a major isoform of the HSP90 family, HSP90AB1 (HSP90β) is usually constitutively expressed [14]. Loones et al. revealed that mouse embryos synthesize high levels of HSP90β during the preimplantation stage of development [15]. Further studies showed that mice with Hsp90β gene mutations failed to differentiate to form the placental labyrinth in the presence of normal Hsp90α abundance [16], suggesting that it plays a critical role in trophoblast differentiation. Moreover, invasion of the decidua by villous trophoblasts plays a crucial role in successful embryo implantation, and the mechanism of embryo implantation is similar to tumor invasion [17]. An increasing number of previous studies have demonstrated that upregulation of HSP90AB1 abundance can promote the invasion and metastasis of various cancers, such as gastric cancer, lung cancer, and colon cancer [18,19,20]. Therefore, it can be assumed that downregulation of HSP90AB1 abundance in aborted villus tissue may lead to reduced differentiation and invasion of trophoblast cells and affect embryo implantation. However, further studies are still needed to explore the mechanisms underlying this reduced abundance.

HSPD1 is constitutively expressed in mitochondria and cytoplasm and plays a key role in chaperoning, thermotolerance, apoptosis, cancer, immunology and embryonic development [21]. HSP60 expression promotes embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation and inhibits ESC apoptosis [22]. HSP60 was reported to promote progesterone synthesis [23] and regulate yolk sac erythropoiesis in mice [24]. Lipopolysaccharide-induced implantation failure may be related to significantly lower abundance of Hsp90, Hsp70, and Hsp60 [25]. Cumulatively, these findings suggest that HSP60 plays a distinct role during embryonic development and implantation. In our study, we verified that Hsp60 is obviously downregulated in villi of the EMA group compared with the control group. Similar to our study, using proteomics technology, Johnstone [26] et al. observed that HSP60 was downregulated in highly purified cytotrophoblasts from patients with preeclamptic placentas. Another study showed that the abundance of HSP27, HSP60, HSP70, and HSP90 in syncytiotrophoblasts (STs) and cytotrophoblasts around infarction region placentas with intrauterine fetal growth restriction was decreased due to lethal damage [27]. However, the abundance of HSP60 in peripheral blood was inconsistent with our data, which may be due to the elevation of HSP60 levels in plasma originating from sources other than the trophoblast layer [28]. Further research showed that HSP60 acts as a potent inhibitor of apoptosis by binding to proapoptotic regulators such as Bax, Bak, p21, p53, and survivin [29,30,31]. Gupta et al. observed that HSP60 could form a complex with Bax in the cytosol and inhibit its translocation to mitochondria, leading to the suppression of cell apoptosis [32]. Moreover, apoptosis is increased in EMA villi [33]. Therefore, we speculated that downregulation of HSP60 might promote the apoptosis of villous trophoblast cells and lead to EMA. Further studies will be conducted to verify this hypothesis.

HSPA13 is known as a member of the HSP70 family. To date, research on the biological function of HSPA13 in trophoblasts and its relationship with EMA is still relatively limited. Studies have shown that HSPA13 is overexpressed in colon and hepatocellular carcinoma tissues [34, 35]. Infiltrating gestational trophoblasts share many similarities with tumor cells in biological activity. Therefore, the downregulation of HSPA13 abundance in villus tissue may be critical in the development of EMA disease.

Conclusion

In summary, through PRM-targeted quantitative proteomics, it was found in this study that HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13 in villus tissue were candidate proteins with potential importance in EMA. Notably, this method enables more precise and efficient study of changes in protein profiles. However, this study is limited by the small sample size and lack of further functional studies on HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13, so the specific mechanisms by which they are involved in the occurrence of EMA have not been clarified. In future studies, we will further investigate the specific functions of these three proteins and their roles in the pathological mechanisms of EMA and identify relevant therapeutic targets. In summary, their potential applications at the maternal–fetal interface would require larger and more in-depth studies.

Availability of data and materials

The data supporting the findings of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Jurkovic D, Overton C, Bender-Atik R. Diagnosis and management of first trimester miscarriage. BMJ. 2013;346:f3676.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Maio A, Vazquez D. Extracellular heat shock proteins: a new location, a new function. Shock. 2013;40(4):239–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Jee B, Dhar R, Singh S, Karmakar S. Heat shock proteins and their role in pregnancy: redefining the function of “old rum in a new bottle.” Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9: 648463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kampinga HH, Hageman J, Vos MJ, et al. Guidelines for the nomenclature of the human heat shock proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2009;14(1):105–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciocca DR, Stati AO, Fanelli MA, Gaestel M. Expression of heat shock protein 25,000 in rat uterus during pregnancy and pseudopregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1996;54(6):1326–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yuan JX, Xiao LJ, Lu CL, et al. Increased expression of heat shock protein 105 in rat uterus of early pregnancy and its significance in embryo implantation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2009;7:23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulic T, Laskarin G, Dominovic M, et al. Potential role of heat-shock protein 70 and interleukin-15 in the pathogenesis of threatened spontaneous abortions. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2016;76(2):126–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jain CV, Jessmon P, Barrak CT, et al. Trophoblast survival signaling during human placentation requires HSP70 activation of MMP2-mediated HBEGF shedding. Cell Death Differ. 2017;24(10):1772–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu M, Sun X, Zhu L, et al. Long noncoding RNA RP11–115N4.1 promotes inflammatory responses by interacting with HNRNPH3 and enhancing the transcription of HSP70 in unexplained recurrent spontaneous abortion. Front Immunol. 2021;12:717785.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Miao W, Li L, Wang Y. A Targeted proteomic approach for heat shock proteins reveals DNAJB4 as a suppressor for melanoma metastasis. Anal Chem. 2018;90(11):6835–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Miao W, Fan M, Huang M, et al. Targeted profiling of heat shock proteome in radioresistant breast cancer cells[J]. Chem Res Toxicol. 2019;32(2):326–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Paschalis A, Sheehan B, Riisnaes R, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen heterogeneity and DNA repair defects in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019;76(4):469–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cui Y, He L, Yang CY, Ye Q. iTRAQ and PRM-based quantitative proteomics in early recurrent spontaneous abortion: biomarkers discovery. Clin Proteomics. 2019;18(16):36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sreedhar AS, Kalmár E, Csermely P, Shen YF. Hsp90 isoforms: functions, expression and clinical importance. FEBS Lett. 2004;562(1–3):11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Loones MT, Rallu M, Mezger V, Morange M. HSP gene expression and HSF2 in mouse development. Cell Mol Life Sci. 1997;53(2):179–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Voss AK, Thomas T, Gruss P. Mice lacking HSP90beta fail to develop a placental labyrinth. Development. 2000;127(1):1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abbas Y, Turco MY, Burton GJ, Moffett A. Investigation of human trophoblast invasion in vitro. Hum Reprod Update. 2020;26(4):501–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang H, Deng G, Ai M, et al. Hsp90ab1stabilizes LRP5 to promote epithelial-mesenchymal transition via activating of AKT and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways in gastric cancer progression. Oncogene. 2019;38(9):1489–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Biaoxue R, Xiling J, Shuanying Y, et al. Upregulation of Hsp90-beta and annexin A1 correlates with poor survival and lymphatic metastasis in lung cancer patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2012;31(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. de la Mare JA, Jurgens T, Edkins AL. Extracellular Hsp90 and TGFβ regulate adhesion, migration and anchorage independent growth in a paired colon cancer cell line model. BMC Cancer. 2017;17(1):202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Malik JA, Lone R. Heat shock proteins with an emphasis on HSP 60. Mol Biol Rep. 2021;48(10):6959–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo NH, Lee EH, Seo JH, et al. HSP60 is required for stemness and proper differentiation of mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp Mol Med. 2018;50(3): e459.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Monreal-Flores J, Espinosa-García MT, García-Regalado A, et al. The heat shock protein 60 promotes progesterone synthesis in mitochondria of JEG-3 cells. Reprod Biol. 2017;17(2):154–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Duan Y, Wang H, Mitchell-Silbaugh K, et al. Heat shock protein 60 regulates yolk sac erythropoiesis in mice. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(10):766.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jaiswal MK, Agrawal V, Jaiswal YK, et al. Lipopolysaccharide drives alternation of heat shock proteins and induces failure of blastocyst implantation in mouse. Biol Reprod. 2013;88(6):162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnstone ED, Sawicki G, Guilbert L, et al. Differential proteomic analysis of highly purified placental cytotrophoblasts in pre-eclampsia demonstrates a state of increased oxidative stress and reduced cytotrophoblast antioxidant defense. Proteomics. 2011;11(20):4077–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wataba K, Saito T, Takeuchi M, et al. Changed expression of heat shock proteins in various pathological findings in placentas with intrauterine fetal growth restriction. Med Electron Microsc. 2004;37(3):170–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Álvarez-Cabrera MC, Barrientos-Galeana E, Barrera-García A, et al. Secretion of heat shock -60, -70 kD protein, IL-1β and TNFα levels in serum of a term normal pregnancy and patients with pre-eclampsia development. J Cell Mol Med. 2018;22(11):5748–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang YH, Yeh CT. Functional compartmentalization of HSP60-Survivin interaction between mitochondria and cytosol in cancer cells. Cells. 2019;9(1):23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gupta S, Knowlton AA. HSP60, Bax, apoptosis and the heart [J]. J Cell Mol Med. 2005;9(1):51–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghosh JC, Dohi T, Kang BH. Hsp60 regulation of tumor cell apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(8):5188–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gupta S, Knowlton AA. Cytosolic heat shock protein 60, hypoxia and apoptosis. Circulation. 2002;106(21):2727–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang Y, Zhou J, Li MQ, et al. MicroRNA-184 promotes apoptosis of trophoblast cells via targeting WIG1 and induces early spontaneous abortion. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(3):223.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Guan Y, Zhu X, Liang J, et al. Upregulation of HSPA1A/HSPA1B/HSPA7 and downregulation of HSPA9 were related to poor survival in colon cancer. Front Oncol. 2021;11: 749673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang B, Lan T, Xiao H, et al. The expression profiles and prognostic values of HSP70s in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2021;21(1):286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate Shanghai Applied Protein Technology (Shanghai, China) for the technical support of LC–PRM experiment.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (No. 20171BAB205013) and Jiangxi Provincial Health and Family Planning Commission science and technology plan (20195472).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China

    Xiao-Fang Chen & Qi Chen

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China

    Xiao-Fang Chen & Xiao-Qing Chen

  3. Department of Pathology, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China

    Hai-Lian Luo & Li-Na Xia

  4. Key Laboratory of Birth Defect for Prevention and Control of Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nanchang, 330000, Jiangxi, China

    Shu-Hui Huang

Authors
  1. Xiao-Fang Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiao-Qing Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hai-Lian Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li-Na Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shu-Hui Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Qi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Shu-Hui Huang and Qi Chen conceived and designed the project; Xiao-Qing Chen and Hai-Lian Luo performed Western blotting and Immunohistochemistry; Chen Xiao-Qing and Li-Na Xia collected and analyzed data; Xiao-Fang Chen wrote the manuscript; All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shu-Hui Huang or Qi Chen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was supported by the Ethics Committee of Jiangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital. All the studies provided informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Fig. S1. Western blot analysis to verify selected differentially expressed proteins HSP90AB1, HSPD1 and HSPA13; Candidate proteins were examined in triplicate and normalized to GAPDH levels for quantitative analysis; 1-6represent sample 1 to sample 6.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, XF., Chen, XQ., Luo, HL. et al. PRM-based quantitative proteomics analysis of altered HSP abundance in villi and decidua of patients with early missed abortion. Proteome Sci 21, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-023-00213-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-023-00213-w

Keywords

Proteome Science

ISSN: 1477-5956