Skip to main content

Chronic kidney disease-related atherosclerosis - proteomic studies of blood plasma



Atherosclerosis is considered the major cause of the dramatic increase in cardiovascular mortality among patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although the close connection between atherosclerosis and kidney dysfunction is undeniable, factors enhancing CKD-mediated plaque formation are still not well recognized.


To increase our knowledge of this process we carried out a comparative proteomic analysis of blood plasma proteins isolated from 75 patients in various stages of renal dysfunction (CKD group), 25 patients with advanced cardiovascular disease (CVD group) and 25 healthy volunteers (HV group). The collected samples were subjected to 2D electrophoresis. Then, individual proteins were identified by mass spectrometry. The comparative analysis involving CKD and HV groups showed a differential accumulation of α-1-microglobulin, apolipoprotein A-IV, γ-fibrinogen and haptoglobin in patients with kidney disease. Exactly the same proteins were identified as differentially expressed when proteomes of CVD patients and HV were compared. However, a direct comparison of CKD and CVD groups revealed significant differences in the accumulation of two proteins: α-1-microglobulin and apolipoprotein A-IV.


The obtained results indicate that at least two processes differentially contribute to the plaque formation in CKD- and CVD-mediated atherosclerosis. It seems that the inflammatory process is more intense in CKD patients. On the other hand, the down- and up-regulation of apolipoprotein A-IV in CVD and CKD groups, respectively, suggests that substantial differences exist in the efficacy of cholesterol transport in both groups of patients.


Atherosclerosis, characterized by the accumulation of lipids, inflammatory cells, and connective tissue within the intima-media layer of the arterial wall [1], is a well documented syndrome associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). During the last decades the wide spectrum of factors that support the development of atherosclerotic CVD has been determined. This long list includes: age, sex, lipid disturbances, hypoalbuminemia, hyperuricemia, anemia, hyperhomocysteinemia, coagulation anomalies, insulin resistance. Atherosclerosis has also been recognized as one of the most serious and frequent complications occurring in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Interestingly, CVD risk factors mentioned above seem to be less essential or even unessential for the emergence of CKD-related atherosclerosis (CKDA).

The formation of atherosclerotic plaques is considered the major cause of the dramatic increase in cardiovascular mortality among CKD patients. Recently, it has been shown that atherosclerosis can accompany even the early stages of CKD. This means that the plaque appears long before the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is developed [2]. A number of studies suggest that both the acceleration of atherosclerosis and the increase of the cardiovascular event risk correlate with the reduction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) [35]. Compared to the general population, patients with CKD have a 20-fold higher prevalence of premature arterial atherosclerosis [6].

Considering the earlier observations one can distinguish at least two types of atherosclerosis: the "classic" type associated with CVD and the "non-classic" type associated with CKD. They can produce similar clinical symptoms, but the mechanisms which underlie the formation of CVD- and CKD-related plaques are not necessarily identical. The composition of atherosclerotic lesions in CKD patients and CVD patients with no renal function impairment is different. Histological studies demonstrated that atherosclerotic plaques collected from the CKD patients contain more calcium deposits within their intimal part but the content of collagenous fibers and smooth muscle cells is reduced [6, 7]. It seems that the atherosclerotic plaque that forms during chronic kidney disease includes more inorganic substances. However, the question of whether the higher plaque instability observed in CKD patients results from extended calcification remains open [8].

Recently, a number of uremia-associated factors enhancing the progression of atherosclerosis were identified [9]. Some of them are also encountered in the general population, but others appear to be more specially linked to CKD: uremic toxins, hypervolemia, chronic microinflammation, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, intravenous iron therapy and disturbances of the calcium-phosphate metabolism.

Although the close connection between atherosclerosis and kidney dysfunction is undeniable, mechanisms that enhance the formation of plaque in CKD patients are still unclear. To increase our knowledge of this phenomenon we carried out a standard comparative proteomic analysis of blood plasma proteins isolated from three groups of subjects: CKD patients, CVD patients and healthy volunteers. As a result we identified four proteins whose accumulation changes during CKD development. In addition, we found that two of them accumulate differently in CKD and CVD patients.


Subjects and samples

This study involved 125 persons divided into five equal groups. The majority of them were patients with CKD (75 persons; 21 females, 54 males), treated in the Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, at Poznan University of Medical Sciences. Based on The National Kidney Foundation Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines [10] the examined CKD patients were divided into three groups according to their eGFR, calculated by the MDRD formula [11]. The first group, CKD1-2, included patients in the initial stages of CKD (stages 1st and 2nd of CKD, with eGFR = 90-60 ml/min/1.73m2). The second group, CKD3-4, included pre-dialyzed patients (stages 3rd and 4th of CKD, with eGFR = 59-15 ml/min/1.73m2). The third group, CKD5, comprised patients with ESRD (stage 5th of CKD with eGFR <15 ml/min/1.73m2) hemodialyzed for 39.6 ± 9.5 months (mean ± SD) with prescriptions of 4.5-5.5 h/session, 3 times per week. The fourth group (called CVD) included 25 patients with CVD with a history and symptoms of cardiovascular disease and cardiovascular instability. No subjects from this group had any clinical symptoms of renal dysfunction. The fifth, control group (HV) contained 25 healthy volunteers matched with the studied groups for age, gender, race, physical activity, tobacco use and BMI, with normal renal function, with a negative history of acute or chronic inflammation and without any clinical symptoms of atherosclerosis. Persons with diabetes mellitus, an acute inflammatory process and malignant tumors were excluded from the study. Demographic data and clinical characteristics of the studied population (n = 125) is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Demographic data and clinical characteristics of the study population (n = 125)

The study protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Before the commencement of the project, an appropriate approval from the Bioethical Commission of Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences was obtained. All participating individuals (i.e. CKD-patients, CVD patients and healthy volunteers) provided signed informed consent for treatment and/or study. For all CKD and CVD patients blood samples were collected when standard monitoring blood tests were performed. In the case of hemodialized patients, blood samples were always drawn before the second hemodialyzis session of the week.

Peripheral blood was collected into a closed monovette system containing EDTA and centrifuged immediately at 1000 g for 15 min. The obtained supernatants were then centrifuged at 16 000 g for 15 min at 4°C and frozen at -80°C. Plasma samples were resuspended in IEF buffer (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% CHAPS 55 mM DTT and 0,5% v/v IPG buffer). Insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 16 000 g for 20 min. Protein concentration was estimated using a commercial 2-D Quant kit (GE Healthcare).

2-D electrophoresis

24 cm IPG strips (pH 4-7, GE Healthcare) were actively rehydrated overnight in IEF buffer contained plasma samples. Each strip was loaded with the same amount of protein (1 mg). The strips were subjected to IEF on IPGphor III (GE Healthcare) using a ramping voltage (50-8000 V) to final 75 000 Vh. After IEF, IPG strips were incubated for 15 min in an equilibration buffer (6 M urea, 2% w/v SDS, 30% v/v glycerol, 50 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.8) with 1% w/v DTT during the first equilibration step or with 2.5% iodoacetamide w/v during the second equilibration step. Second dimension was performed in 11% polyacrylamide gels using the Ettan DALT six system (GE Healthcare) according to the manufacturer's guidelines. For each sample, a 2D analysis was repeated three times. After electrophoresis, gels were stained with Blue Silver overnight [12] and scanned (with Umax scanner, GE Healthcare) using LabScan program.

The images were analyzed using the Image Master Platinum software version 6.0 (GE Healthcare). Spots were detected automatically without filtering. Gel patterns were automatically matched together between classes. In addition, all individual matched spots were validated manually to ensure the correctness of spot matching. To find differently expressed proteins, gap and ratio measures were taken into account. For the ratio, a threshold greater than 1.4 was selected. The relative abundance of each spot (%vol) was calculated as its volume divided by the total volume of matched spots. Spots showing greatest variations were subjected to a Shapiro-Wilk normality test to check the normal distribution of the analyzed population. Analysis of variance between all classes was performed using the ANOVA test to check significant differences between the % volume of each spot in all classes. Unpaired Student's t-test was performed to compare between two particular classes. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Statistica ver. 8.0 software.

Mass spectrometry (MS)

Protein spots were manually excised from gels, transferred to Eppendorf tubes and digested with trypsin. The proteins were identified using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometers. The acquisition of MALDI spectra was performed on an Autoflex MALDI-TOF (Bruker Daltonics, Germany) mass spectrometer operated in reflector mode and using delayed ion extraction. Positively charged ions in the m/z range 820-3500 were analyzed. 0.5 μl of the sample was co-crystallized with CHCA matrix and spotted directly on MALDI AnchorChip target (Bruker Daltonics). For data validation, external calibration was performed with a standard mixture of peptides. Flex control v 2.0 was used for the acquisition of spectra and all further data processing was carried out using Flex analysis v 2.0. Monoisotopic peptide masses were assigned and used for databases research. The proteins were identified by peptide mass fingerprinting using the Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK) program against MSDB/Swiss-Prot database. The protein search was done using the following search parameters: mass tolerance +/-0.2 Da, one allowed missed cleavage, cysteine treated with iodoacetamide to form carbamidomethyl-cysteine and methionine in the oxidized form.

Western blot analysis

Western blot analyses were performed according to a standard procedure. Plasma samples were mixed with SB buffer (125mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol) and total protein concentration was estimated using a commercial 2-D Quant kit (GE Healthcare). Samples containing 30 μg of protein were separated by electrophoresis in a 4-12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (Bis-Tris NuPAGE, Invitrogen). The separated proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane and blocked with PBST (PBS plus 0.1% Tween-20) containing 4% BSA. Blots were then incubated overnight with one of the following primary antibodies (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology): anti-α-1-m (α-1-Microglobulin (10A12) antibody, mouse monoclonal), anti- apoA-IV (apoA-IV (H-240) antibody, rabbit polyclonal), anti-Hp α (haptoglobin α (B-2) antibody, mouse monoclonal), anti-Hp β (haptoglobin β (H-80) antibody, rabbit polyclonal), anti-Fb α (fibrinogen α (26E7) antibody, mouse monoclonal), anti-Fb β (fibrinogen β (H-270) antibody, rabbit polyclonal), anti-Fb γ (fibrinogen γ (H-194) antibody, rabbit polyclonal). Incubation mixtures contained also anti- α1-antitrypsin antibody (AAT (H-203) rabbit polyclonal antibody) or anti-C9 antibody (C9 (X197), mouse monoclonal antibody) which were used as positive controls. After overnight incubation with primary antibodies, blots were washed and probed with anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa Fluor 633 or 635 (Invitrogen). The images were captured using Fuji FLA-5100 scanner. Semi-quantitative analyses of protein accumulation were carried out with the Image Gauge software version 4.0.


Earlier it had been demonstrated that the development of atherosclerotic CVD is usually accompanied by significant changes in the accumulation of several plasma proteins [13, 14]. Based on this observation we attempted to determine whether similar changes occur during the development of kidney dysfunction-related atherosclerosis. The first question we tried to answer was whether and how the progression of CKD influences the composition of blood plasma proteins. For this purpose plasma samples collected from three groups of CKD patients: CKD1-2 group (25 patients in the initial stage of CKD), CKD3-4 group (25 pre-dialyzed patients) and CKD5 group (25 hemodialyzed patients with ESRD) and from 25 healthy volunteers (HV group) were subjected to 2D electrophoresis. After electrophoresis proteins were visualized, extracted from the gel and examined by mass spectrometry. As a result, 42 proteins were identified out of 160 spots observed in an average gel (see Figure 1 and additional file 1). For all identified proteins the relative levels of their accumulation in each sample were determined (mean from three analyses). Finally, comparative analyses of blood plasma proteomes derived from three groups of CKD patients (CKD1-2, CKD3-4 and CKD5 proteomes) and healthy volunteers (HV proteome) were carried out.

Figure 1
figure 1

A representative example of the 2D PAGE analysis of plasma samples collected from CKD patients. The presented sample was obtained from CKD3-4 patient. IEF was performed in pH 4-7. The proteins identified by mass spectrometry are indexed by numbers (see additional file 1). Differently expressed proteins are boxed.

Proteomes representing the three groups of patients were compared among each other and with the HV proteome. The undertaken analysis revealed that the following four proteins accumulated in the examined samples, at different levels: α-1-microglobulin (α-1-m), apolipoprotein A-IV (apo-A-IV), γ-fibrinogen (Fb), and β-haptoglobin (Hp) (Table 2). For all of them statistically significant differences were observed if any of the CKD groups was compared with the HV group. However, these differences were not always statistically significant when proteomes of CKD patients were confronted with each other (for details see additional file 2). Two out of four identified proteins, i.e.: α-1-m and apo-A-IV occurred only in a single form. The remaining two: Fb and Hp occurred in two and in five isoforms, respectively. The results of 2D electrophoresis suggested that the corresponding isoforms have different isoelectric points (Figure 1). The relative abundance of all four proteins was higher in each group of CKD patients than in the HV group. However, only for α-1-m was a linear correlation between protein concentration and CKD progression observed (Figure 2 and 3a, additional file 3). For apo-A-IV, we found a significant increase of protein accumulation during the initial phase of the disease (in groups CKD1-2 and CKD3-4). Afterwards, it remained at a similarly high level in group CKD5 (Figure 3b). The accumulation of Fb and Hp was increased to the similar levels in all three groups of CKD patients. It is worth mentioning, however, that the concentration of both proteins was usually slightly higher in CKD3-4 than in groups CKD1-2 and CKD5 (Figure 3c,3d). In addition, we found that the concentration of one Fb isoform (FbI) and two Hp isoforms (HpI and HpV) grew more rapidly than the concentrations of corresponding isoforms, especially in groups CKD1-2 and CKD3-4.

Table 2 Short characteristic of the proteins differentially expressed in HV and CKD groups as well as in HV and CVD groups
Figure 2
figure 2

The close-up sections of α-1-m spots visualized by the 2D PAGE analysis of samples isolated from representative patients belonging to all five examined groups.

Figure 3
figure 3

The relative increase of the accumulation of α-1-m (a), apo-A-IV (b), Fb (c) and Hp (d) in the plasma of CKD patients (calculated against the control group). For the actual values of relative abundances, standard deviations, and p values see additional file 3.

Our second question concerned differences between blood plasma proteome in CKD and CVD patients. Because all individuals included to the CVD group displayed the symptoms of the advanced cardiac disease we compared them with the CKD5 group (ESRD patients have much the same symptoms of cardiac disease as patients from group CVD) and with healthy volunteers (group HV was used as a reference). The comparison between CVD and HV groups showed that exactly the same set of proteins (α-1-m, apo-A-IV, Fb and Hp) was differently expressed as earlier when CKD and HV groups were analyzed (Figure 4, additional file 4). Surprisingly, we found that only two proteins, α-1-m and apoA-IV, showed significantly different accumulation in CVD and CKD5 groups. Interestingly, both belong to the set of four proteins differentially accumulating in all three CKD and HV groups and in CVD and HV groups. α-1-m accumulated to higher levels in CVD and CKD5 groups than in the HV group (Figure 4a). However, the increase of protein concentration was significantly higher in the blood plasma of CKD5 patients. A different pattern of changes was observed for apo-A-IV. In comparison to HV, its concentration was increased in the CKD5 group and decreased in the CVD group (Fig.4b). We observed similar profiles of the accumulation of the two remaining previously identified proteins, Fb and Hp, in CVD and CKD5 group (Figure 4c, 4d).

Figure 4
figure 4

The relative increase of the accumulation of α-1-m (a), apo-A-IV (b), Hp (c) and Fb (d) in the plasma of patients with advanced symptoms of cardiovascular disease (CKD5 and CVD calculated against the control group). For the actual values of relative abundances, standard deviations and p values see additional file 4.

For verification of our 2DE-MS results, we performed western blot analyses of all four differentially accumulating proteins (α-1-m, apo-A-IV, Fb, and Hp). The analyses included also α-, β-fibrinogen and α-haptoglobin chains which were not found using 2DE-MS method. Western blotting was carried out both for selected individual samples and for pooled samples within each examined group. Based on our 2DE results we decided to use C9 or α1-antitrypsin proteins as positive controls. The representative blots obtained for the pooled samples are shown in Figure 5. Results of their semi-quantitative analysis were consistent with those obtained using a 2DE-MS method. In addition, the data collected revealed that haptogobin α and fibrinogen β accumulated to similar levels in all studied groups. We found some fluctuation in fibrinogen α concentration. However, the differences observed were statistically insignificant.

Figure 5
figure 5

Western blot analysis of pooled plasma samples (all samples from each examined group were pooled). The western blots obtained for: α-1-m (a); apo-A-IV (b); Hp α and β (c); Fb α, β and γ (d). C9 and α1-antitrypsin (AAT) proteins were used as positive controls. (-) - negative control, M-molecular weight marker [kDa].

Because not all patients included to this study were treated with statin or IACE (inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme) we attempted to determine whether the applied therapy affected the accumulation of differentially expressed proteins (α-1-m, apo-A-IV, Fb or Hp). To this end, each examined group of patients (CKD1-2, CKD3-4, CKD5 and CVD) was divided into two subgroups: treated and not treated with statin/IACE. Then for each differentially expressed protein, its accumulation levels in both subgroups were compared. Statistical analysis did not show any significant differences between protein concentrations in corresponding subgroups. P values established individually for each protein in all studied groups of patients were always much higher than 0.05 (see additional file 5). This demonstrated that neither statin nor IACE treatment influenced the concentrations of α-1-m, apo-A-IV, Fb, and Hp in patients' blood plasma.

At present, eGFR is widely used as one of key parameters characterizing the level of renal dysfunction. According to current standards eGFR above 90 ml/min/1.73m2 is considered a norm. The results presented above suggested that the advancement of kidney disease may also be estimated based on α-1-m protein accumulation in blood plasma. Indeed, we found a correlation between the decrease of eGRF and the increase of α-1-m concentration expressed in %vol (Figure 6). Based on this observation one could expect that α-1-m protein can serve as an early indicator of the impairment of kidney functions.

Figure 6
figure 6

The inverse correlation between eGFR and the relative abundance (%vol) of α-1-m in the plasma of healthy volunteers and CKD patients.

Because patients suffering from a cardiac disease are at an increased risk of CKD development we attempted to determine whether the first clinical symptoms of renal dysfunction are preceded by the increase of α-1-m accumulation. To this end, we divided CVD patients into two subgroups. The first one, CVD > 90 included individuals with normal eGFR, i.e. 90 ml/min/1.73m2 or higher. The second one, CVD < 90 included individuals with eGFR below 90 ml/min/1.73m2 (mean eGFR in CVD group was 92.6 ml/min/1.73m2). Subsequently, we compared α-1-m accumulation in both subgroups and in HV and CKD1-2 group (Figure 7). This revealed that α-1-m occurred at the lowest level in the HV group: the eGFR mean value was 124 ml/min/1.73m2. In group CVD > 90 (mean eGFR 106.7 ml/min/1.73m2) α-1-m concentration was markedly increased. Such significant increases of α-1-m accumulation were also observed in CVD < 90 and CKD1-2 groups. The mean eGFR calculated for patients classified in these groups was 78.58 and 77.04 ml/min/1.73m2, respectively.

Figure 7
figure 7

The inverse correlation between eGFR and the relative abundance (%vol) of α-1-m in the plasma of healthy volunteers, CVD and CKD1-2 patients.


The lack of correlation between the well-established risk factors enhancing atherosclerotic CVD and the emergence of CKD-related atherosclerosis [9] clearly indicates that different mechanisms are involved in plaque formation in both diseases. However, the question of how and to what extent these mechanisms differ still remains open. A comparative analysis of blood plasma proteomes isolated from patients in different stages of CKD permitted us to identify four differently expressed proteins: α-1-m, apoA-IV, Fb and Hp. The collected data also suggest that the first two identified proteins i.e.: α-1-m and apoA-IV may find practical application as early markers of nephropathy.

In general, these results seem consistent with observations made by other authors during their studies involving only CKD patients. They have earlier found increased levels of α-1-m in plasma and urine of CKD patients [1517] and postulated an inverse correlation between eGFR and α-1-m concentration in patients with various renal diseases [18]. There are also a few reports demonstrating the increased levels of apoA-IV in hemodialyzed patients [19, 20] and in patients in milder stages of CKD [21]. As a result, a direct correlation between apoA-IV level and CKD progression has already been suggested [22, 23].

Elevated concentrations of Hp and Fb proteins in CKD patients' blood or urine have also been reported earlier although little is known about the role of these proteins in CKD development. Both of them are positive acute-phase proteins. Thus, their levels can be increased during inflammation or infection. The increased accumulation of Hp was observed in the urine of patients with nephropathy [24]. The elevated level of Fb was found in the serum of subjects with renal insufficiency [25, 26].

Here, we also provide a first direct comparison of blood plasma proteomes isolated from CKD and CVD patients. It demonstrated that the same four proteins (α-1-m, apoA-IV, Fb and Hp) are differently expressed in both groups of subjects (CVD and CKD patients). This would suggest that the differences between mechanisms mediating plaque formation in CVD and CKD are not as significant as we expected. This hypothesis is cast doubt on, however, by the above presented results of our comparative proteomic analysis of CVD and CKD5 patients with similarly advanced symptoms of atherosclerosis. It revealed that two proteins, namely, Hp and Fb are similarly expressed in both groups of patients. However, the levels of α-1-m and apoA-IV accumulation are significantly different. This result indicates that there are some common elements but also some distinct ones in mechanisms of CVD- and CKD-mediated atherosclerosis.

It seems that Fb and Hp proteins play the same role in both diseases. Fb's primary role is to mediate fibrin clot formation and platelet aggregation by binding to cell surface receptors, growth factors, and coagulation factors [27]. In addition, it was shown that Fb binding to thrombin and factor XIII produces clots that are mechanically stiffer and resistant to fibrinolysis [28]. These interactions may explain the association between Fb levels and atherosclerosis. However, they can also contribute to pathophysiological processes including inflammation and thrombosis. The major biological function of Hp is hemoglobin binding. It prevents hemoglobin-mediated renal parenchymal injury and loss of iron following intravascular hemolysis [29]. In addition, haptoglobin can inhibit prostaglandin synthesis and is believed to have anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties [30]. Thus, higher Hp expression can be most likely classified as a patient's response to atherosclerosis-related stress.

α-1-m is up-regulated in both CVD and CKD patients but its level is more than 3 times higher in the latter group. This may indicate that α-1-m plays the same role in CVD- and CKD-related atherosclerosis although its contribution to both mechanisms is different. Despite extensive studies the function and physiological role of α-1-m protein remain unclear. α-1-m, a member of the lipocalin superfamily, is a low molecular weight protein component of plasma first discovered in pathological human urine [31]. There are several lines of evidence that α-1-m contributes to the regulation of the immune system [reviewed in 32]. Accordingly one can speculate that immunological response is more activated in CKD patients than in CVD patients.

Our most striking finding concerned the apoA-IV expression in CKD and CVD groups. It was up-regulated in subjects with chronic kidney dysfunction and down-regulated in subjects with cardiac disease. ApoA-IV belongs to a wide group of apolipoproteins which participate in lipid transport and metabolism. There are several reports showing that apoA-IV participates in the reverse cholesterol transport pathway [33, 34]. It removes cholesterol from peripheral cells and transports it to the liver or to steroidogenic organs where cholesterol is metabolized. Thus one can hypothesize that insufficient synthesis of apoA-IV is one of the important factors affecting atherosclerosis development in CVD patients. On the other hand, in CKD patients reverse cholesterol transport should theoretically be increased due to more effective apoA-IV gene expression. However, the fast progress of atherosclerosis indicates either that other components of this pathway do not function properly or that the production of cholesterol is so high that it cannot be efficiently removed from blood. The data presented here are consistent with earlier observations made by Kronenberg and coworkers. Kronenberg et al. found that low apoA-IV levels are associated with CVD, and this association is independent of triglicerides and HDL cholesterol concentrations. Accordingly, they concluded that apoA-IV may play an antiatherogenic role [35]. Afterwards, the same authors reported elevated concentration of plasma apoA-IV in patients with mild and moderate renal failure [21].

We also found that patient treatment with statin or IACE does not influence the levels of all four differentially expressed proteins accumulation in blood plasma. Moreover, the undertaken comparative proteomic analysis revealed that α-1-m can be used not only as a marker of nephropathy in CKD patients as was postulated earlier [36, 37], but also as a predictive marker for selecting among CVD patients with normal eGFR (>90 ml/min/1.73m2) those who are in danger of renal failure.


In general, we have found that the same four proteins differentially accumulate in blood plasma of CKD and CVD patients. Accumulation of these proteins is not affected by treatment with statin or IACE. In case of two proteins: Fb and Hp, the character of the observed changes was similar in both analyzed groups (CKD5 and CVD). However, the remaining two proteins α-1-m and apoA-IV were expressed to significantly different levels. Thus, our results provide an additional line of evidence that different molecular mechanisms are involved in the development of CKD- and CVD-related atherosclerosis. It seems that the former is highly accelerated by the inflammatory processes and to a lesser degree affected by defects in cholesterol transport or metabolism. In addition, we showed that α-1-m protein can serve as an early biomarker enabling the prediction of oncoming renal dysfunction in CVD patients.





immobilized pH gradients


isoelectric focusing


ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid


sodium dodecyl sulphate


α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid


matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight


  1. 1.

    Libby P: Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature 2002, 420: 868–874. 10.1038/nature01323

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Vanholder R, Massy Z, Argiles A, Spasovski G, Verbeke F, Lameire N, European Uremic Toxin Work Group: Chronic kidney disease as cause of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2005, 20: 1048–1056. 10.1093/ndt/gfh813

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sarnak MJ, Levey AS, Schoolwerth AC, Coresh J: Kidney disease as a risk factor from development of cardiovascular disease: a statement from the American Heart Association Councils on Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, High Blood Pressure Research, Clinical Cardiology, and Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2003, 108: 2154–2169. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000095676.90936.80

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Weiner DE, Tighiouart H, Amin MG, Stark PC, MacLeod B, Griffith JL, Salem DN, Levey AS, Sarnak MJ: Chronic kidney disease as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality: a pooled analysis of community based studies. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004, 15: 1307–1315. 10.1097/01.ASN.0000123691.46138.E2

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau JL, White HD, Nordlander R, Maggioni A, Dickstein K, Zelenkofske S, Leimberger JD, Califf RM, Pfeffer MA: Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2004, 351: 1285–1295. 10.1056/NEJMoa041365

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Pelisek J, Assadian A, Sarkar O, Eckstein HH, Frank H: Carotid plaque composition in chronic kidney disease: a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endo Vasc Surg 2010, 39: 11–16. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.09.024

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kono K, Fujii H, Miyoshi N, Kawamori H, Shite J, Hirata K, Fukagawa M: Coronary plaque morphology using virtual histology-intravascular ultrasound analysis in hemodialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial, in press.

  8. 8.

    Guérin AP, London GM, Marchais SJ, Metivier F: Arterial stiffening and vascular calcifications in end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2000, 15: 1014–1021. 10.1093/ndt/15.7.1014

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kraśniak A, Drożdż M, Pasowicz M, Chmiel G, Michałek M, Szumilak D, Podolec P, Klimeczek P, Konieczyńska M, Wicher-Muniak E, Tracz W, Khoa TN, Souberbielle JC, Drueke TB, Sulowicz W: Factors involved in vascular calcification and atherosclerosis in maintenance haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007, 22: 515–521.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    National Kidney Foundation (NKF) Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) Advisory board: K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis 2002, 39: S1–246.

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D: A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999, 130: 461–470.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM, Carnemolla B, Orecchia P, Zardi L, Righetti PG: Blue Silver: a very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 2004, 25: 1327–1333. 10.1002/elps.200305844

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fach ME, Garulacan LA, Gao J, Xiao Q, Storm SM, Dubaquie YP, Hefta SA, Opiteck GJ: In vitro biomarker discovery for atherosclerosis by proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2004, 3: 1200–1210. 10.1074/mcp.M400160-MCP200

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Berhane BT, Zong C, Liem DA, Huang A, Le S, Edmondson RD, Jones RC, Qiao X, Whitelegge JP, Ping P, Vondriska TM: Cardiovascular-related proteins identified in human plasma by the HUPO plasma proteome project pilot phase. Proteomics 2005, 5: 3520–30. 10.1002/pmic.200401308

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Grubb A: Diagnostic value of analysis of cystatin C and protein HC in biological fluids. Clin Nephrol 1992, 38: S20–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Corso A, Zappasodi P, Pascutto C, Bosoni T, Mangiacavalli S, Lorenzi A, Rusconi C, Lazzarino M: Urinary proteins in multiple myeloma: correlation with clinical parameters and diagnostic implication. Ann Hematol 2003, 82: 487–91. 10.1007/s00277-003-0699-9

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Herget-Rosenthal S, Poppen D, Husing J, Marggraf G, Pietruck F, Jakob HG, Philipp T, Kribben A: Prognostic value of tubular proteinuria and enzymuria in nonoliguric acute tubular necrosis. Clin Chem 2004, 50: 552–558. 10.1373/clinchem.2003.027763

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kusano E, Suzuki M, Asano Y, Itoh Y, Takagi K, Kawai T: Human alpha 1-microglobulin and its relationship to renal function. Nephron 1985, 41: 320–324. 10.1159/000183608

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Seishima M, Muto Y: An increased apo A-IV serum concentration of patients with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis. Clin Chim Acta 1987, 167: 303–311. 10.1016/0009-8981(87)90350-0

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Dieplinger H, Lobentanz EM, König P, Graf H, Sandholzer C, Matthys E, Rosseneu M, Utermann G: Plasma apolipoprotein A-IV metabolism in patients with chronic renal disease. Eur J Clin Invest 1992, 22: 166–174. 10.1111/j.1365-2362.1992.tb01822.x

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kronenberg F, Kuen E, Ritz E, König P, Kraatz G, Lhotta K, Mann JF, Müller GA, Neyer U, Riegel W, Riegler P, Schwenger V, von Eckardstein A: Apolipoprotein A-IV serum concentrations are elevated in patients with mild and moderate renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002, 13: 461–469.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Boes E, Fliser D, Ritz E, König P, Lhotta K, Mann JF, Müller GA, Neyer U, Riegel W, Riegler P, Kronenberg F: Apolipoprotein A IV- predicts progression of chronic kidney disease: the mild to moderate kidney disease study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2006, 17: 528–536. 10.1681/ASN.2005070733

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kronenberg F: Emerging risk factors and markers of chronic kidney disease progression. Nat Rev Nephrol 2009, 5: 677–689. 10.1038/nrneph.2009.173

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Varghese SA, Powell TB, Budisavljevic MN, Oates JC, Raymond JR, Almeida JS, Arthur JM: Urine biomarkers predict the cause of glomerular disease. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007, 18: 913–922. 10.1681/ASN.2006070767

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Shlipak MG, Fried LF, Crump C, Bleyer AJ, Manolio TA, Tracy RP, Furberg CD, Psaty BM: Elevations of inflammatory and procoagulant biomarkers in elderly persons with renal insufficiency. Circulation 2003, 107: 87–92. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000042700.48769.59

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Emokpae MA, Uadia PO, Gadzama AA: Correlation of oxidative stress and inflammatory markers with the severity of sickle cell nephropathy. Ann Afr Med 2010, 9: 141–146. 10.4103/1596-3519.68363

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Farrel DH: Pathophysiologic roles of the fibrinogen gamma chain. Curr Opin Hematol 2004, 11: 151–155. 10.1097/01.moh.0000131440.02397.a4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Scott EM, Ariens RA, Grant PJ: Genetic and environmental determinants of fibrin structure and function relevance to clinical disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2004, 24: 1558–1566. 10.1161/

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Marchand A, Galen RS, Van Lente F: The predictive value of serum haptoglobin in hemolytic disease. JAMA 1980, 243: 1909–1911. 10.1001/jama.243.19.1909

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Sadrzadem SM, Bozorgmehr J: Haptoglobin phenotypes in health and disorders. Am J Clin Pathol 2004,121(Suppl 1):S97-S104.

    Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Ekström B, Peterson PA, Berggård I: A urinary and plasma alpha1-glycoprotein of low molecular weight: isolation and some properties. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1975, 65: 1427–1433. 10.1016/S0006-291X(75)80388-3

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Akerstrom B, Logdberg LE, Berggard I, Osmark P, Lindqvist A: Alpha(1)-microglobulin: a yellow-brown lipocalin. Biochim Biophys Acta 2000, 1482: 172–184. 10.1016/S0167-4838(00)00157-6

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stein O, Stein Y, Lefevre M, Roheim PS: The role of apolipoprotein A-IV in reverse cholesterol transport studied with cultured cells and liposomes derived from another analog of phosphatidylcholine. Biochim Biophys Acta 1986, 878: 7–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Steinmetz A, Barbaras R, Ghalim N, Clavey V, Fruchart JC, Ailhaud G: Human apolipoprotein A-IV binds to apolipoprotein A-I/A-II receptor sites and promotes cholesterol efflux from adipose cells. J Biol Chem 1990, 265: 7859–7863.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Kronenberg F, Stühlinger M, Trenkwalder E, Geethanjali FS, Pachinger O, von Eckardstein A, Dieplinger H: Low apolipoprotein A-IV plasma concentration in men with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000, 36: 751–757. 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00775-0

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Itoh Y, Enomoto H, Takagi K, Kawai T: Clinical usefulness of serum alpha 1-microglobulin as a sensitive indicator for renal insufficiency. Nephron 1983, 33: 69–70. 10.1159/000182911

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Weber MH, Verweibe R: Alpha 1-microglobulin (protein HC): features of a promising indicator of proximal tubular dysfunction. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1992, 30: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This research has been partially supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant No. N N 402 2098 33.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Figlerowicz.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

ML conceived, designed and performed the 2DE and MS experiments, participated in data analysis, prepared the first draft of the manuscript.

DF conceived and designed the study, collected the samples for this study, participated in the clinical data analysis and in the first draft preparation.

EP, MWK and AW were involved in collecting samples for this study and clinical data analysis.

MF conceived and designed the study and experiments, participated in data analysis, prepared the manuscript.

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Magdalena Luczak, Dorota Formanowicz contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Proteins identified in the plasma of CKD and CVD patients

Additional file 1: . This file provides information about the identified proteins: eg. MSDB/SwissProt accession number, MALDI score and sequence coverage. Spots corresponding to the particular numbers are shown in Figure 1. (XLS 20 KB)

Differences between the relative accumulations of the differentially expressed proteins in all examined groups

Additional file 2: . p values were generated using unpaired Student's t-test (Statistica ver. 8.0). Differences identified as insignificant (p > 0.05) are bolded. (XLS 24 KB)

Relative abundance (%vol) of proteins differentially expressed in HV and CKD groups

Additional file 3: . This file provides information about the relative abundance of the proteins differentially expressed in HV and CKD groups, In addition, it presents standard deviations and the results of unpaired Student's t-test generated using the Statistica ver. 8.0 software. Statistically insignificant results are bolded. (XLS 27 KB)

Relative abundance (%vol) of proteins differentially expressed in HV and CKD5 groups as well as in HV and CVD groups

Additional file 4: . This file provides information about the relative abundance of proteins differentially expressed in HV and CKD5 groups as well as in HV and CVD groups. In addition, it presents standard deviations and the results of unpaired Student's t-test generated using the Statistica ver. 8.0 software. Statistically insignificant results are bolded. (XLS 26 KB)

Statistical analysis of differences in α-1-m, apo-A-IV, Fb and Hp accumulation in plasma samples derived from patients treated or not treated with statin/IACE

Additional file 5: . P values were generated using unpaired Student's t-test (Statistica ver. 8.0). This file presents the final outcome of statistical analysis (p values) which was undertaken to determine whether the applied treatment affected the accumulation of differentially expressed proteins. P values were established individually for each protein in all studied groups of patients. (XLS 42 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luczak, M., Formanowicz, D., Pawliczak, E. et al. Chronic kidney disease-related atherosclerosis - proteomic studies of blood plasma. Proteome Sci 9, 25 (2011).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Chronic Kidney Disease Patient
  • Chronic Kidney Disease Progression
  • Comparative Proteomic Analysis
  • Chronic Kidney Disease Group