Open Access

Comparative secretome analysis of Streptomyces scabiei during growth in the presence or absence of potato suberin

  • Doaa Komeil2,
  • Rebeca Padilla-Reynaud1,
  • Sylvain Lerat1,
  • Anne-Marie Simao-Beaunoir1 and
  • Carole Beaulieu1Email author
Proteome Science201412:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-12-35

Received: 19 February 2014

Accepted: 30 May 2014

Published: 25 June 2014

Abstract

Background

Suberin is a recalcitrant plant biopolymer composed of a polyphenolic and a polyaliphatic domain. Although suberin contributes to a significant portion of soil organic matter, the biological process of suberin degradation is poorly characterized. It has been suggested that Streptomyces scabiei, a plant pathogenic bacterium, can produce suberin-degrading enzymes. In this study, a comparative analysis of the S. scabiei secretome from culture media supplemented or not with potato suberin was carried out to identify enzymes that could be involved in suberin degradation.

Methods

S. scabiei was grown in the presence of casein only or in the presence of both casein and suberin. Extracellular proteins from 1-, 3- and 5-day-old supernatants were analyzed by LC-MS/MS to determine their putative functions. Real-time RT-PCR was performed to monitor the expression level of genes encoding several proteins potentially involved in suberin degradation.

Results

The effect of suberin on the extracellular protein profile of S. scabiei strain has been analyzed. A total of 246 proteins were found to be common in the data sets from both casein medium (CM) and casein-suberin medium (CSM), whereas 124 and 139 proteins were detected only in CM or CSM, respectively. The identified proteins could be divided into 19 functional groups. Two functional groups of proteins (degradation of aromatic compounds and secondary metabolism) were only associated with the CSM. A high proportion of the proteins found to be either exclusively produced, or overproduced, in presence of suberin were involved in carbohydrate metabolism. Most of the proteins included in the lipid metabolism class have been detected in CSM. Apart from lipid metabolism proteins, other identified proteins, particularly two feruloyl esterases, may also actively participate in the breakdown of suberin architecture. Both feruloyl esterase genes were overexpressed between 30 to 340 times in the presence of suberin.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that the presence of suberin in S. scabiei growth medium induced the production of a wide variety of glycosyl hydrolases. Furthermore, this study has allowed the identification of extracellular enzymes that could be involved in the degradation of suberin, including enzymes of the lipid metabolism and feruloyl esterases.

Keywords

Streptomyces scabies Common scabProteomicsFeruloyl esteraseGlycosyl hydrolaseLipid metabolismSuberinase

Background

Proteomics has been successfully applied to analyze both intracellular proteins and the secretomes of several microorganisms, including plant pathogens [1]. Both the intracellular proteome [2] and the secretome [3] of the plant pathogenic bacterium Streptomyces scabiei have been analyzed. This pathogen is the predominant causal agent of potato common scab and causes important economic losses in most potato growing-areas [4]. The disease is characterized by shallow, raised, or deep-pitted corky-like lesions on the tuber surface. S. scabiei produces toxins called thaxtomins, which cause hypertrophy and cell death in host plant tissues, and are essential for pathogenicity [4].

Thaxtomin biosynthetic genes are expressed during secondary metabolism in the presence of compounds associated with tuber cell walls: cellobiose and suberin [5]. The intracellular proteomes of S. scabiei grown with or without suberin have previously been compared [2]. The addition of the plant polymer to the growth media resulted in an increase in proteins involved in stress response, glycolysis and morphological differentiation. Suberin also appeared to affect secondary metabolism as it caused the overproduction of BldK proteins, which are known to be involved in differentiation and secondary metabolism [2]. Suberin is also known to promote differentiation and secondary metabolism in different Streptomyces species [6].

Suberin is a major constituent of potato skin. This polymer is composed of two spatially distinct but covalently-linked domains; the polyphenolic domain embedded in the primary cell wall, and the polyaliphatic domain [7]. Suberized lamellae are located between the primary cell wall and the plasma membrane [7]. The polyaromatic domain is a lignin-like structure that mostly contains polyhydroxycinnamates such as feruloyltyramine [7]. The aliphatic moiety of suberin is mainly composed of ω-hydroxyacids, α,ω-diacids, fatty acids, primary alcohols and glycerol [8, 9]. Glycerol may account for up to 25% of the total suberin monomers [10]. Nevertheless, the molecular structure of suberin remains speculative although the most recent models propose that ferulic acids link the aliphatic polyester domain of suberin to the neighboring polyaromatics [9, 10].

Suberin is one of the most recalcitrant plant molecular structures in nature [6] and microbial degradation of suberin is a process that is poorly characterized. Suberinases are polyesterases produced by a number of fungi that can at least partially depolymerize the lipidic polymer [11]. Some authors have suggested that S. scabiei can also produce suberin-degrading esterases [12] that may be involved in pathogenicity. The purpose of this study was to identify enzymes that could potentially be involved in suberin degradation. S. scabiei EF-35 was grown in culture media containing casein as the sole carbon source or in media containing both casein and suberin. The secretomes associated with these growth conditions were then compared. Enzymes involved in both polysaccharide catabolism and lipid metabolism were up-regulated in the presence of suberin.

Results and discussion

Comparative analysis of the S. scabiei EF-35 secretome in the presence or absence of suberin

A previous study has allowed the identification, in S. scabiei EF-35, of intracellular soluble proteins that were differentially produced in the presence of suberin [2]. Furthermore, the twin arginine protein transport pathway secretome of another S. scabiei strain has been characterized by 2-D electrophoresis in four different culture media (instant potato mash medium, soy-flour mannitol medium, R5 medium and oat bran medium) [3]. In the present study, the effect of suberin, a polymer associated with potato tuber periderm, on the extracellular protein profile of S. scabiei EF-35 has been analyzed. Extracellular protein profiles of supernatants from S. scabiei EF-35 cultures grown in the presence of casein only or in the presence of both casein and suberin were compared after 1, 3 and 5 days of growth. The proteins were fractionated by one-dimensional electrophoresis and analyzed by LC-MS/MS, as fractionation of secretomes has been shown to increase the overall number of identified proteins by approximately 30% [13].

A total of 907 different proteins were found in at least one of the media tested and 509 proteins met the filtering criteria. Protein abundance was estimated by spectral counting/protein molecular weight (kDa). While 263 out of 509 proteins were restricted to a specific medium, others were found in both culture media. Proteins found in both media are listed in supporting data (Additional file 1: Table S1). Proteins detected only in casein medium (CM) are presented in Additional file 2: Table S2. A list of proteins with a 5-fold greater abundance in the casein/suberin-containing medium (CSM) compared to CM is shown in Table 1. Proteins only found in CSM are listed in Table 2. All proteins listed have been divided into 19 functional groups based on their putative functions (Table 3).
Table 1

Proteins produced by Streptomyces scabiei with a 5-fold greater abundance in casein-suberin medium

Protein assignationa

Gene assignation

Putative function

Abundance (spectrum count/MWb) in casein-suberin medium

Abundance (spectrum count/MWb) in casein medium

   

Day 1

Day 3

Day 5

Day 1

Day 3

Day 5

Translational, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

 C9Z240

SCAB_25251d

Polyribonucleotide nucleotidyltransferase

0.04 ± 0.03

0.25 ± 0.10

0.22 ± 0.06

0.01 ± 0.01

ndc

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9Z3N7

SCAB_25991d

Ribosome recycling factor

0.43 ± 0.13

nd

nd

0.08 ± 0.07

0.03 ± 0.05

0.10 ± 0.10

 C9Z3P0

SCAB_26021d

30S ribosomal protein S2

0.23 ± 0.12

0.05 ± 0.02

nd

0.03 ± 0.05

nd

nd

 C9Z3Q3

SCAB_26151d

50S ribosomal protein L19

0.67 ± 0.32

1.13 ± 0.56

0.68 ± 0.25

0.10 ± 0.18

nd

nd

 C9YW46

SCAB_36621d

30S ribosomal protein S9

0.42 ± 0.24

0.35 ± 0.20

0.11 ± 0.06

0.12 ± 0.13

nd

nd

 C9YW47

SCAB_36631d

50S ribosomal protein L13

0.25 ± 0.13

0.24 ± 0.10

0.10 ± 0.03

0.02 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9YW61

SCAB_36771d

30S ribosomal protein S5

0.33 ± 0.06

0.38 ± 0.05

0.01 ± 0.02

0.13 ± 0.23

nd

nd

 C9YW63

SCAB_36791d

50S ribosomal protein L6

0.18 ± 0.12

0.33 ± 0.16

0.02 ± 0.03

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

nd

 C9YW64

SCAB_36801d

30S ribosomal protein S8

0.17 ± 0.15

0.64 ± 0.45

0.12 ± 0.21

0.02 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9YW68

SCAB_36841d

50S ribosomal protein L14

0.21 ± 0.04

0.63 ± 0.47

0.54 ± 0.45

0.05 ± 0.09

nd

nd

 C9YW72

SCAB_36881d

30S ribosomal protein S3

0.17 ± 0.09

0.09 ± 0.08

0.01 ± 0.03

0.02 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9YW73

SCAB_36891d

50S ribosomal protein L22

0.44 ± 0.16

0.85 ± 0.60

0.67 ± 0.40

0.08 ± 0.13

nd

nd

 C9YW77

SCAB_36931d

50S ribosomal protein L4

0.62 ± 0.13

1.00 ± 0.20

0.66 ± 0.06

0.10 ± 0.14

nd

nd

 C9YW78

SCAB_36941d

50S ribosomal protein L3

0.55 ± 0.10

0.96 ± 0.26

0.56 ± 0.15

0.04 ± 0.08

nd

nd

 C9YW94

SCAB_37111d

30S ribosomal protein S7

0.51 ± 0.18

0.23 ± 0.24

nd

0.04 ± 0.07

nd

nd

 C9ZAN5

SCAB_4612 d

30S ribosomal protein S18

0.30 ± 0.06

0.17 ± 0.18

0.06 ± 0.09

0.04 ± 0.06

nd

nd

 C9Z656

SCAB_75031d

30S ribosomal protein S4

0.51 ± 0.32

0.45 ± 0.14

0.04 ± 0.04

0.01 ± 0.02

nd

nd

Transcription

 C9ZAB5

SCAB_30041d

Cyclic nucleotide-binding protein

0.03 ± 0.01

0.18 ± 0.11

0.17 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.06

nd

nd

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

 C9YUC5

SCAB_4961

Glucuronoxylanase XynC

0.15 ± 0.09

0.30 ± 0.21

0.26 ± 0.10

nd

nd

0.04 ± 0.03

 C9Z8V2

SCAB_45141

D-alanyl-D-alanine carboxypeptidase

0.04 ± 0.02

0.42 ± 0.07

0.40 ± 0.12

0.04 ± 0.05

nd

nd

Defense mechanisms and virulence

 C9Z785

SCAB_44161d

β-lactamase

0.43 ± 0.07

0.51 ± 0.17

0.45 ± 0.12

0.02 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9Z160

SCAB_56441

Protease

0.39 ± 0.23

0.00 ± 0.01

nd

nd

0.21 ± 0.02

0.11 ± 0.05

Differentiation

 C9Z7Z7

SCAB_89661

Factor C morphological differentiation homolog

nd

0.14 ± 0.05

0.11 ± 0.06

nd

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

Energy production and conversion

 C9Z8E8

SCAB_28761d

ATP synthase subunit β

0.28 ± 0.06

0.48 ± 0.26

0.44 ± 0.15

0.07 ± 0.11

0.06 ± 0.07

0.13 ± 0.04

 C9Z8F0

SCAB_28781d

ATP synthase subunit α

0.17 ± 0.02

0.45 ± 0.11

0.40 ± 0.20

0.05 ± 0.06

0.06 ± 0.05

0.06 ± 0.03

 C9ZGW6

SCAB_34651d

Oxidoreductase

0.05 ± 0.08

0.33 ± 0.08

0.35 ± 0.07

0.02 ± 0.04

0.04 ± 0.05

0.05 ± 0.08

 C9ZE86

SCAB_79151

Cytokinin dehydrogenase

0.14 ± 0.01

0.36 ± 0.08

0.35 ± 0.07

nd

0.08 ± 0.10

0.21 ± 0.03

Lipid metabolism

 C9Z707

SCAB_28481d

Acetyl-CoA C-acetyltransferase FadA

0.04 ± 0.03

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

nd

nd

 C9Z5Z2

SCAB_74351

Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase

0.09 ± 0.02

0.23 ± 0.07

0.23 ± 0.04

nd

0.05 ± 0.05

0.03 ± 0.05

 C9ZCR0

SCAB_78851

Sphingolipid ceramide N-deacylase

0.24 ± 0.07

0.12 ± 0.05

0.03 ± 0.03

nd

0.15 ± 0.18

0.04 ± 0.03

Carbohydrate metabolism

 C9ZBE6

SCAB_0631

α-L-fucosidase

0.03 ± 0.00

0.08 ± 0.02

0.06 ± 0.03

nd

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

 C9YSR8

SCAB_3851

Fucosidase

0.18 ± 0.02

0.41 ± 0.16

0.35 ± 0.11

nd

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

 C9YSS0

SCAB_3881

Arabinofuranosidase

0.13 ± 0.01

0.39 ± 0.13

0.32 ± 0.15

nd

0.18 ± 0.16

0.04 ± 0.00

 C9YSS1

SCAB_3891

α-galactosidase

0.10 ± 0.06

0.22 ± 0.21

0.13 ± 0.11

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

nd

 C9YVN3

SCAB_5851

Putative secreted protein

0.01 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.03

0.04 ± 0.04

nd

0.02 ± 0.01

nd

 C9YVP9

SCAB_6021

Endo β-1.4-xylanase

0.29 ± 0.13

0.67 ± 0.20

0.65 ± 0.19

nd

0.04 ± 0.04

nd

 C9Z0D5

SCAB_8871

Endoglucanase

0.03 ± 0.00

0.05 ± 0.02

0.08 ± 0.05

nd

0.02 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.01

 C9Z1T6

SCAB_9291

Lactonase

nd

0.14 ± 0.05

0.20 ± 0.07

nd

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

 C9Z507

SCAB_11431

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.39 ± 0.10

0.88 ± 0.30

0.64 ± 0.17

nd

0.42 ± 0.13

0.33 ± 0.14

 C9Z878

SCAB_13491

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.03 ± 0.02

0.04 ± 0.02

nd

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9ZD50

SCAB_16431

Cellulase

0.43 ± 0.29

1.52 ± 0.86

1.04 ± 0.61

nd

0.93 ± 0.72

0.39 ± 0.04

 C9ZD59

SCAB_16521

Arabinofuranosidase

0.38 ± 0.12

1.07 ± 0.39

0.96 ± 0.36

nd

0.33 ± 0.24

0.33 ± 0.17

 C9ZEP9

SCAB_17001

Cellulase

0.05 ± 0.04

1.05 ± 0.47

1.05 ± 0.38

nd

0.29 ± 0.14

0.19 ± 0.14

 C9ZEQ0

SCAB_17011

Cellulase

0.15 ± 0.04

0.85 ± 0.26

0.73 ± 0.21

nd

0.02 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9YT14

SCAB_19051

Solute-binding lipoprotein

nd

0.12 ± 0.05

0.21 ± 0.11

nd

0.09 ± 0.08

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9YT63

SCAB_19561

β-xylosidase

0.09 ± 0.10

0.23 ± 0.17

0.24 ± 0.17

nd

0.36 ± 0.18

0.20 ± 0.05

 C9YUL1

SCAB_19941

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.47 ± 0.08

0.46 ± 0.29

0.33 ± 0.18

0.04 ± 0.03

0.38 ± 0.12

0.26 ± 0.12

 C9YYV2

SCAB_22931

Arabinofuranosidase

0.24 ± 0.07

0.40 ± 0.20

0.35 ± 0.14

nd

0.22 ± 0.16

0.12 ± 0.03

 C9Z271

SCAB_25571

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.22 ± 0.17

0.17 ± 0.07

nd

0.10 ± 0.09

nd

 C9YUZ2

SCAB_36371

Xylanase/cellulase

0.24 ± 0.10

0.51 ± 0.16

0.47 ± 0.13

0.02 ± 0.02

0.23 ± 0.18

0.14 ± 0.09

 C9Z5L1

SCAB_42951

Glucose / Sorbosone dehydrogenase

0.87 ± 0.12

4.30 ± 2.73

4.18 ± 1.77

0.14 ± 0.14

0.91 ± 0.35

0.60 ± 0.22

 C9Z737

SCAB_43661

Galactan endo-1.6-β-galactosidase

0.20 ± 0.08

0.32 ± 0.11

0.18 ± 0.08

0.01 ± 0.02

nd

nd

 C9Z7A0

SCAB_44311

α-galactosidase

0.13 ± 0.07

0.15 ± 0.03

0.12 ± 0.07

nd

0.07 ± 0.05

0.06 ± 0.05

 C9Z7A1

SCAB_44321

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.17 ± 0.05

0.05 ± 0.05

0.07 ± 0.04

nd

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9YTK2

SCAB_51081

Cellulase

0.01 ± 0.01

0.57 ± 0.25

0.46 ± 0.13

nd

0.05 ± 0.07

nd

 C9Z2N2

SCAB_57161

Endo-β-1.6-galactanase

0.07 ± 0.03

0.36 ± 0.11

0.35 ± 0.04

nd

nd

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9Z451

SCAB_57751

Cellobiose-binding transport system

nd

0.11 ± 0.07

0.18 ± 0.06

nd

0.02 ± 0.02

nd

 C9ZDW4

SCAB_63891

ABC-type xylose transport system

0.13 ± 0.10

0.63 ± 0.14

0.34 ± 0.18

0.03 ± 0.04

1.00 ± 0.30

0.75 ± 0.15

 C9ZFW2

SCAB_66021

β-xylosidase

0.09 ± 0.02

0.23 ± 0.19

0.23 ± 0.18

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.02

 C9ZFW3

SCAB_66031

Arabinofuranosidase

0.46 ± 0.06

0.73 ± 0.26

0.67 ± 0.14

0.03 ± 0.03

0.32 ± 0.15

0.26 ± 0.12

 C9YY63

SCAB_69711d

Phosphoglycerate kinase

0.07 ± 0.05

0.02 ± 0.02

0.00 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.02

nd

nd

 C9Z2V1

SCAB_72711

Endo β-1.4-xylanase

0.29 ± 0.12

0.20 ± 0.11

0.25 ± 0.05

nd

nd

0.05 ± 0.05

 C9Z4J7

SCAB_74141

α-N-furanosidase

0.34 ± 0.14

0.19 ± 0.11

0.20 ± 0.11

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.02

 C9ZB22

SCAB_77441

α-arabinanase

0.06 ± 0.01

0.05 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.02

0.08 ± 0.02

0.11 ± 0.02

 C9ZCR4

SCAB_78891

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.08 ± 0.06

0.28 ± 0.16

0.16 ± 0.06

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

0.11 ± 0.06

 C9ZE94

SCAB_79241

Arabinofuranosidase

0.60 ± 0.16

1.90 ± 0.61

1.51 ± 0.68

nd

0.25 ± 0.11

0.07 ± 0.06

 C9ZE95

SCAB_79251

Xylanase A

0.79 ± 0.30

3.26 ± 1.60

3.17 ± 1.14

0.04 ± 0.01

0.13 ± 0.06

0.12 ± 0.06

 C9Z041

SCAB_84801

Arabinase

0.17 ± 0.06

0.46 ± 0.20

0.45 ± 0.15

0.03 ± 0.06

0.61 ± 0.11

0.47 ± 0.11

 C9Z1I5

SCAB_85231

Chitinase

0.17 ± 0.02

0.80 ± 0.13

0.46 ± 0.16

nd

0.42 ± 0.19

0.26 ± 0.16

 C9Z351

SCAB_86311

Endoglucanase

nd

0.29 ± 0.16

0.27 ± 0.21

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.03

 C9Z674

SCAB_88071

Arabinofuranosidase

0.05 ± 0.04

0.14 ± 0.04

0.14 ± 0.06

nd

0.05 ± 0.05

0.02 ± 0.03

 C9Z804

SCAB_89741

Cellulose-binding protein

0.33 ± 0.09

0.96 ± 0.23

0.55 ± 0.12

nd

0.33 ± 0.14

0.24 ± 0.03

 C9Z9L5

SCAB_90081

Cellulase B

0.21 0.08

0.21 0.08

0.11 ± 0.03

nd

0.03 0.04

0.03 0.03

 C9Z9L6

SCAB_90091

Cellulase

0.30 ± 0.09

0.85 ± 0.30

0.67 ± 0.22

nd

0.07 ± 0.06

0.06 ± 0.04

 C9Z9L7

SCAB_90101

Cellulase

0.59 ± 0.21

1.03 ± 0.39

0.75 ± 0.40

nd

0.56 ± 0.47

0.19 ± 0.07

Amino acid metabolism

 C9Z1W0

SCAB_9531d

Catalase-peroxidase

0.10 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.06

0.04 ± 0.05

0.06 ± 0.05

nd

nd

 C9Z862

SCAB_13321

X-prolyl-dipeptidyl aminopeptidase

0.21 ± 0.16

0.28 ± 0.02

0.18 ± 0.09

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

nd

 C9ZGG7

SCAB_18081

γ-glutamyltranspeptidase

0.39 ± 0.06

0.32 ± 0.08

0.32 ± 0.08

0.01 ± 0.01

nd

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9ZGM2

SCAB_18661

Serine protease

0.19 ± 0.17

nd

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.17 ± 0.16

nd

 C9Z6V3

SCAB_27921

Neutral zinc metalloprotease

0.23 ± 0.12

0.04 ± 0.02

0.04 ± 0.01

0.01 ± 0.02

0.03 ± 0.03

nd

 C9ZAN4

SCAB_46111

Single-stranded DNA-binding protein

0.16 ± 0.05

0.26 ± 0.12

0.29 ± 0.09

0.04 ± 0.06

0.05 ± 0.05

0.11 ± 0.05

 C9YTK4

SCAB_51101d

Phosphoserine aminotransferase

0.14 ± 0.09

0.41 ± 0.23

0.50 ± 0.16

0.06 ± 0.05

0.09 ± 0.05

0.07 ± 0.06

 C9Z498

SCAB_58251

Tripeptidyl aminopeptidase

0.26 ± 0.03

0.10 ± 0.06

0.08 ± 0.05

0.10 ± 0.11

0.06 ± 0.05

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9ZHG5

SCAB_66881d

Glutamine synthetase

0.05 ± 0.04

0.30 ± 0.09

0.09 ± 0.05

0.01 ± 0.02

nd

0.03 ± 0.01

 C9YY61

SCAB_69691

Zinc-binding carboxypeptidase

0.16 ± 0.04

0.05 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.02

0.05 ± 0.02

 C9YZP9

SCAB_70761

Solute-binding protein

0.11 ± 0.05

0.46 ± 0.22

0.35 ± 0.17

nd

0.43 ± 0.19

0.29 ± 0.08

 C9Z1E7

SCAB_72231

Serine protease

0.28 ± 0.15

0.58 ± 0.20

0.50 ± 0.13

0.01 ± 0.02

0.25 ± 0.07

0.24 ± 0.12

 C9Z1N0

SCAB_85681d

Tyrosinase

0.31 ± 0.05

0.02 ± 0.03

0.01 ± 0.01

0.01 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.02

nd

Nucleotide metabolism

 C9ZGX4

SCAB_49491

5'-nucleotidase

0.17 ± 0.07

0.12 ± 0.05

0.06 ± 0.04

0.01 ± 0.01

nd

nd

Inorganic ion metabolism

 C9ZH91

SCAB_66141

Alkaline phosphatase

0.21 ± 0.07

0.25 ± 0.03

0.18 ± 0.08

nd

nd

0.03 ± 0.03

General function prediction only

 C9Z871

SCAB_13411

Oxidoreductase

1.04 ± 0.30

0.87 ± 0.20

0.70 ± 0.28

0.22 ± 0.16

0.16 ± 0.21

0.02 ± 0.03

 C9ZAW6

SCAB_62471

Aminopeptidase

0.30 ± 0.07

0.54 ± 0.28

0.43 ± 0.17

0.01 ± 0.01

0.19 ± 0.14

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9ZE96

SCAB_79261

Feruloyl esterase

0.30 ± 0.16

0.48 ± 0.29

0.41 ± 0.20

nd

0.03 ± 0.04

0.03 ± 0.02

Unknown function

 C9YVL7

SCAB_5681

 

0.44 ± 0.20

0.61 ± 0.19

0.54 ± 0.31

nd

0.11 ± 0.14

nd

 C9YUN3

SCAB_20171

 

0.11 ± 0.11

0.08 ± 0.06

0.09 ± 0.03

nd

0.09 ± 0.05

0.03 ± 0.05

 C9ZGQ1

SCAB_33981

 

1.19 ± 0.44

3.88 ± 1.18

2.99 ± 0.95

0.18 ± 0.09

1.95 ± 0.48

1.33 ± 0.32

 C9YUT0

SCAB_35731

 

0.14 ± 0.05

nd

nd

nd

nd

0.06 ± 0.05

 C9Z411

SCAB_41931

 

0.07 ± 0.12

nd

nd

nd

0.07 ± 0.12

nd

 C9ZHG0

SCAB_66831

 

0.09 ± 0.04

0.12 ± 0.07

0.09 ± 0.11

0.09 ± 0.00

0.01 ± 0.03

nd

 C9Z4J0

SCAB_74081

 

0.30 ± 0.06

0.44 ± 0.32

0.32 ± 0.17

nd

0.02 ± 0.04

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9Z7P8

SCAB_75721

 

0.29 ± 0.04

0.34 ± 0.08

0.24 ± 0.09

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.10 ± 0.07

aUniprot accession number; bData are the mean of three replicates; cnd: not detected; dProtein with intracellular localisation prediction.

Table 2

Proteins specifically produced by Streptomyces scabiei in the casein-suberin medium

Protein assignationa

Gene assignation

Putative function

Abundance (spectrum count/ MWb)

   

Day 1

Day 3

Day 5

Translational, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

 C9Z241

SCAB_25261d

30S ribosomal protein S15

0.15 ± 0.26

0.38 ± 0.27

0.03 ± 0.05

 C9YW50

SCAB_36661d

50S ribosomal protein L17

0.43 ± 0.22

0.51 ± 0.32

0.40 ± 0.32

 C9YW52

SCAB_36681d

30S ribosomal protein S11

0.31 ± 0.18

0.08 ± 0.11

nd

 C9YW59

SCAB_36751d

50S ribosomal protein L15

0.21 ± 0.18

0.42 ± 0.27

0.21 ± 0.20

 C9YW62

SCAB_36781d

50S ribosomal protein L18

0.31 ± 0.18

0.32 ± 0.11

0.24 ± 0.14

 C9YW66

SCAB_36821d

50S ribosomal protein L5

0.38 ± 0.21

0.33 ± 0.11

0.13 ± 0.05

 C9YW67

SCAB_36831d

50S ribosomal protein L24

0.06 ± 0.10

0.03 ± 0.04

nd

 C9YW69

SCAB_36851d

30S ribosomal protein S17

0.15 ± 0.10

0.38 ± 0.33

0.05 ± 0.08

 C9YW71

SCAB_36871d

50S ribosomal protein L16

0.15 ± 0.13

0.08 ± 0.10

0.01 ± 0.03

 C9YW75

SCAB_36911

50S ribosomal protein L2

0.40 ± 0.28

0.97 ± 0.24

0.60 ± 0.12

 C9YW76

SCAB_36921

50S ribosomal protein L23

0.24 ± 0.10

0.32 ± 0.19

0.29 ± 0.22

 C9YW79

SCAB_36951d

30S ribosomal protein S10

0.36 ± 0.05

0.32 ± 0.08

nd

 C9YW95

SCAB_37121

30S ribosomal protein S12

0.24 ± 0.11

0.14 ± 0.09

0.05 ± 0.07

 C9Z0W3

SCAB_39971d

30S ribosomal protein S18 1

nd

0.07 ± 0.18

nd

 C9Z0W7

SCAB_40011d

50S ribosomal protein L28 2

nd

0.29 ± 0.10

0.17 ± 0.10

 C9ZAN3

SCAB_46101d

30S ribosomal protein S6

0.09 ± 0.16

0.23 ± 0.13

0.11 ± 0.09

 C9Z2I8

SCAB_56731d

Ribonuclease PH

0.04 ± 0.04

0.10 ± 0.03

0.11 ± 0.03

 C9Z7H2

SCAB_60151d

50S ribosomal protein L21

0.33 ± 0.08

0.36 ± 0.31

0.25 ± 0.33

 C9Z7H3

SCAB_60161d

50S ribosomal protein L27

0.22 ± 0.11

0.48 ± 0.15

0.19 ± 0.15

 C9YWQ2

SCAB_69061d

30S ribosomal protein S1

0.07 ± 0.06

nd

nd

 C9Z316

SCAB_73401d

tRNA (adenine-N(1)-)-methyltransferase

0.02 ± 0.03

0.07 ± 0.07

0.07 ± 0.04

 C9Z4H9

SCAB_73971

50S ribosomal protein L35

0.57 ± 0.00

0.90 ± 0.44

0.48 ± 0.28

 C9Z4I0

SCAB_73981d

50S ribosomal protein L20

0.38 ± 0.35

0.42 ± 0.25

0.30 ± 0.13

Transcription

 

 C9Z8G5

SCAB_28931d

Transcription termination factor

0.03 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9YWA1

SCAB_37181d

DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit β

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

nd

 C9YWA2

SCAB_37191d

DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit β

nd

0.02 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.01

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperones

 C9YYX4

SCAB_23161d

Membrane protease

nd

0.04 ± 0.06

0.10 ± 0.07

 C9YYJ3

SCAB_84021d

Carbamoyltransferase

nd

0.14 ± 0.11

0.17 ± 0.07

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

 C9Z1V1

SCAB_9441d

Sugar isomerase

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9Z234

SCAB_25191d

Dihydrodipicolinate synthase

0.02 ± 0.04

0.01 ± 0.03

0.04 ± 0.05

 C9ZAN0

SCAB_46061d

Alanine racemase

0.01 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.02

0.01 ± 0.02

 C9Z2W0

SCAB_72801

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.28 ± 0.15

0.90 ± 0.20

0.83 ± 0.12

Signal transduction mechanism

 C9YYC2

SCAB_70311d

TerD-like stress protein

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.04 ± 0.03

Defense mechanism

 C9ZAA4

SCAB_29931d

Nickel superoxide dismutase

0.16 ± 0.08

nd

0.01 ± 0.03

 C9YZ91

SCAB_38731d

β-lactamase

0.63 ± 0.05

0.54 ± 0.07

0.34 ± 0.11

 C9Z5I1

SCAB_42661d

β-lactamase

0.10 ± 0.02

nd

nd

 C9ZGZ0

SCAB_49661d

Peroxiredoxin

nd

0.03 ± 0.06

0.09 ± 0.11

 C9Z043

SCAB_84821

β-lactamase

0.02 ± 0.03

0.18 ± 0.04

0.11 ± 0.05

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

 C9YYT5

SCAB_8041

Aminohydrolase

0.01 ± 0.02

0.26 ± 0.11

0.22 ± 0.11

 C9YWT5

SCAB_69391d

Pseudouridine-5'-phosphate glycosidase

nd

0.03 ± 0.05

0.02 ± 0.03

 C9YU69

SCAB_82441

Poly(3-hydroxyalkanoate) depolymerase C

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.03

 C9Z6A5

SCAB_88391d

2-hydroxyhepta-2.4-diene-1.7-dioate isomerase

nd

nd

0.04 ± 0.05

Energy production and conversion

 C9ZBX1

SCAB_31271d

Ferredoxin

0.10 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9YU38

SCAB_82111d

Oxidoreductase

0.03 ± 0.04

0.02 ± 0.03

0.01 ± 0.02

Lipid metabolism

 C9ZD66

SCAB_16601d

CoA transferase

nd

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

 C9Z6Y2

SCAB_28231d

Acetate/propionate kinase

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.04 ± 0.04

 C9ZGV4

SCAB_34521d

Enoyl-CoA hydratase

0.03 ± 0.03

nd

nd

 C9Z776

SCAB_44071d

Esterase-lipase

0.18 ± 0.05

0.10 ± 0.07

0.07 ± 0.02

 C9YTK3

SCAB_51091

Esterase-lipase

nd

0.14 ± 0.05

0.13 ± 0.05

 C9YY49

SCAB_54571d

Acetyl CoA acyl transferase

0.01 ± 0.01

0.10 ± 0.09

0.14 ± 0.07

 C9YYE5

SCAB_70541

Lipolytic enzyme

0.07 ± 0.09

nd

nd

 C9Z7Q3

SCAB_75771d

Acyl-CoA dehydrogenase

0.02 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

Degradation of aromatic compounds

 C9Z2P6

SCAB_57301

3-oxo-5.6-dehydrosuberyl-CoA semialdehyde dehydrogenase

0.13 ± 0.17

nd

nd

Carbohydrate metabolism

 C9YSY4

SCAB_4561

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.00 ± 0.00

0.02 ± 0.02

0.00 ± 0.00

 C9YVM5

SCAB_5761

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.04 ± 0.05

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9YVN4

SCAB_5861

Carbohydrate esterase

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.06

 C9YVP5

SCAB_5981

Cellulase B

0.09 ± 0.06

0.31 ± 0.19

0.20 ± 0.13

 C9YVP8

SCAB_6011

Glycosyl hydrolase/xylanase

0.01 ± 0.01

nd

0.03 ± 0.04

 C9YX59

SCAB_6471

α-L-fucosidase

nd

0.09 ± 0.11

0.06 ± 0.09

 C9Z1U5

SCAB_9381

Exo-α-sialidase

0.16 ± 0.08

0.34 ± 0.17

0.37 ± 0.14

 C9Z885

SCAB_13561

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.02 ± 0.03

0.01 ± 0.01

0.00 ± 0.01

 C9ZBJ5

SCAB_15481d

α-mannosidase

nd

0.04 ± 0.03

0.07 ± 0.07

 C9ZD61

SCAB_16551

Mannosidase

0.02 ± 0.04

0.18 ± 0.14

0.15 ± 0.12

 C9ZD71

SCAB_16651

SugarP isomerase

0.01 ± 0.02

0.05 ± 0.03

0.02 ± 0.02

 C9ZEQ1

SCAB_17021

Cellulase

0.04 ± 0.02

0.47 ± 0.13

0.36 ± 0.10

 C9ZEQ3

SCAB_17041

Glycosyl transferase

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

nd

 C9Z574

SCAB_26801

Polysaccharide lyase

nd

0.04 ± 0.03

0.05 ± 0.04

 C9YUZ7

SCAB_36421d

β-xylosidase

nd

0.05 ± 0.02

0.05 ± 0.02

 C9YW88

SCAB_37051

Cellulase/xylanase

0.09 ± 0.03

0.24 ± 0.09

0.35 ± 0.14

 C9Z725

SCAB_43531

Polysaccharide lyase

0.00 ±

0.02 ± 0.03

0.04 ± 0.05

 C9Z789

SCAB_44201

β-galactosidase

0.01 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.02

0.00 ± 0.00

 C9Z4A0

SCAB_58271

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.03

 C9ZDV4

SCAB_63781d

α-L-arabinofuranosidase

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.04

 C9YYE3

SCAB_70521

Bifunctional pectate lyase/pectinesterase

0.02 ± 0.02

nd

nd

 C9YYE6

SCAB_70551

Pectate lyase

0.91 ± 0.12

0.01 ± 0.01

nd

 C9YYE7

SCAB_70561

Pectinesterase

0.30 ± 0.04

0.05 ± 0.02

0.03 ± 0.03

 C9YYE8

SCAB_70571

Pectinesterase

0.24 ± 0.08

0.07 ± 0.02

0.04 ± 0.03

 C9YYF0

SCAB_70591

Pectate lyase

0.36 ± 0.09

0.41 ± 0.18

0.29 ± 0.30

 C9Z2Z4

SCAB_73161

Secreted protein

0.36 ± 0.06

0.17 ± 0.17

0.04 ± 0.06

 C9Z623

SCAB_74681

Licheninase

0.07 ± 0.07

0.34 ± 0.07

0.27 ± 0.11

 C9ZAZ8

SCAB_77201

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.12 ± 0.08

0.95 ± 0.25

0.71 ± 0.14

 C9ZB17

SCAB_77391

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.01 ± 0.02

0.10 ± 0.11

0.06 ± 0.06

 C9ZE74

SCAB_79011

Acetyl-xylan esterase

nd

0.59 ± 0.13

0.52 ± 0.09

 C9ZEB7

SCAB_79481

Xylanase A

0.01 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.03

0.02 ± 0.03

 C9ZFY5

SCAB_79861d

Xylose isomerase

0.04 ± 0.01

0.10 ± 0.06

0.11 ± 0.05

 C9YU11

SCAB_81841

Glycosyl hydrolase

0.13 ± 0.11

0.06 ± 0.06

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9YU29

SCAB_82021

β-mannosidase

nd

0.22 ± 0.06

0.24 ± 0.07

 C9YU66

SCAB_82411

Pectate lyase

nd

0.07 ± 0.08

0.06 ± 0.07

 C9Z820

SCAB_89901d

β-D-xylosidase

nd

0.02 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.02

Amino acid metabolism

 C9YVT3

SCAB_6381

Extracellular small neutral protease

0.25 ± 0.21

0.08 ± 0.11

0.05 ± 0.08

 C9YYP7

SCAB_7651

Zinc metalloprotease

0.13 ± 0.05

0.04 ± 0.04

0.03 ± 0.02

 C9YYX3

SCAB_23151d

Arginine deaminase

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.02

 C9Z238

SCAB_25231d

Dihydrodipicolinate reductase

nd

0.03 ± 0.05

0.01 ± 0.03

 C9Z281

SCAB_25691d

4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase

0.01 ± 0.03

0.04 ± 0.04

0.02 ± 0.01

 C9Z5A0

SCAB_27061d

Ketol-acid reductoisomerase

0.02 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.02

0.00 ± 0.01

 C9YTF8

SCAB_35641d

Serine hydroxymethyltransferase 4

0.02 ± 0.02

nd

0.01 ± 0.01

 C9Z8U5

SCAB_45071d

Zinc aminopeptidase

0.04 ± 0.01

0.05 ± 0.01

0.07 ± 0.03

 C9ZC37

SCAB_46731d

Xaa-Pro aminopeptidase

0.01 ± 0.01

0.06 ± 0.04

0.16 ± 0.12

 C9Z7B6

SCAB_59611d

Aminopeptidase N

0.05 ± 0.04

nd

nd

 C9Z4N7

SCAB_87271

Peptidase

0.03 ± 0.05

0.10 ± 0.13

0.04 ± 0.04

Coenzyme metabolism

 C9Z1Y4

SCAB_9771d

Cobalamin biosynthesis protein

0.02 ± 0.02

0.18 ± 0.04

0.12 ± 0.07

 C9Z3M4

SCAB_25861d

Aminotransferase

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.03

 C9Z402

SCAB_41841d

Aminotransferase

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

0.01 ± 0.03

 C9Z638

SCAB_74841d

Pyridoxal biosynthesis lyase pdxS

0.03 ± 0.05

nd

nd

 C9Z7L0

SCAB_75311d

S-adenosylmethionine synthase

nd

0.01 ± 0.02

0.02 ± 0.02

Nucleotide metabolism

 C9Z407

SCAB_41891d

Adenylosuccinate synthetase

0.01 ± 0.03

nd

nd

 C9ZDR6

SCAB_47861d

Phosphoribosylformylglycinamidine cyclo-ligase

0.01 ± 0.02

0.00 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.02

 C9Z7F8

SCAB_60011d

Nucleoside diphosphate kinase

0.02 ± 0.04

0.08 ± 0.09

0.09 ± 0.13

 C9YVK8

SCAB_68841

5' nucleotidase

0.03 ± 0.02

0.15 ± 0.09

0.08 ± 0.07

Inorganic ion metabolism

 C9YVE4

SCAB_68191d

Alkaline phosphatase

0.13 ± 0.04

0.06 ± 0.04

0.06 ± 0.05

 C9ZB70

SCAB_77971

Alkaline phosphatase

0.16 ± 0.01

0.19 ± 0.07

0.17 ± 0.11

General function prediction only

 C9YSY7

SCAB_4591

Acyltransferases

0.07 ± 0.07

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

 C9YVP7

SCAB_6001d

Feruloyl esterase

nd

0.05 ± 0.04

0.06 ± 0.06

 C9Z3D2

SCAB_10131

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.06 ± 0.03

0.06 ± 0.03

 C9YT61

SCAB_19541

Carbohydrate esterase

0.02 ± 0.03

0.05 ± 0.03

0.01 ± 0.02

 C9Z233

SCAB_25181d

B lactamase

0.01 ± 0.01

0.03 ± 0.04

0.05 ± 0.03

 C9Z6S2

SCAB_27611d

Phage tail sheath protein FI

nd

0.03 ± 0.01

0.09 ± 0.05

 C9Z8S0

SCAB_44821d

Phosphatase

0.03 ± 0.05

0.00 ± 0.01

nd

 C9Z994

SCAB_61611d

Protease

0.05 ± 0.04

0.14 ± 0.03

0.03 ± 0.03

 C9ZAQ7

SCAB_61831d

Metalloendopeptidase

nd

nd

0.03 ± 0.03

 C9ZAU3

SCAB_62211

Phosphatase

nd

0.11 ± 0.05

0.17 ± 0.07

 C9ZDW7

SCAB_63921d

Dehydratase

nd

0.04 ± 0.05

0.07 ± 0.03

 C9ZHB0

SCAB_66321d

F420-dependent NADP reductase

nd

0.02 ± 0.03

0.05 ± 0.05

 C9ZB18

SCAB_77401

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.06 ± 0.03

0.05 ± 0.04

 C9ZCL9

SCAB_78431

Tripeptidylaminopeptidase

0.13 ± 0.01

0.14 ± 0.04

0.14 ± 0.11

 C9ZEA8

SCAB_79391

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.13 ± 0.07

0.11 ± 0.09

 C9ZEC6

SCAB_79571

Glycosyl hydrolase

nd

0.03 ± 0.03

0.01 ± 0.02

 C9YYG1

SCAB_83671d

Acetyl esterase

nd

0.00 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.05

 C9Z047

SCAB_84861

Amidase

0.21 ± 0.05

0.11 ± 0.03

0.06 ± 0.06

Unknown function

 C9Z6Q2

SCAB_12841

 

0.44 ± 0.12

0.70 ± 0.25

0.59 ± 0.17

 C9ZBK5

SCAB_15581d

 

0.04 ± 0.04

0.03 ± 0.02

0.03 ± 0.03

 C9YVU0

SCAB_20641

 

0.07 ± 0.04

0.34 ± 0.09

0.38 ± 0.11

 C9Z0X8

SCAB_40131

 

0.28 ± 0.13

0.14 ± 0.05

0.07 ± 0.03

 C9Z5E6

SCAB_42301d

 

nd

0.03 ± 0.06

0.03 ± 0.06

 C9ZGX5

SCAB_49501

 

0.06 ± 0.06

nd

nd

 C9YV55

SCAB_52141d

 

0.02 ± 0.03

0.03 ± 0.03

0.08 ± 0.09

 C9Z1G8

SCAB_72441

 

0.17 ± 0.06

0.27 ± 0.09

0.32 ± 0.10

 C9Z609

SCAB_74541

 

0.12 ± 0.14

nd

0.02 ± 0.04

 C9ZG06

SCAB_80071

 

0.02 ± 0.03

nd

nd

aUniprot accession number; bData are the mean of three replicates; cnd: not detected; dProtein with intracellular localisation prediction.

Table 3

Distribution of Streptomyces scabiei proteins into functional groups

Class of proteins

Number of proteins

 

In CM only

Overproduced in CSMa

In CSM only

Translational, ribosomal structure and biogenesis

2b

17b

23b

Transcription

2

1b

3b

Posttranslational modification, protein turnover, chaperone

11

0

2b

Cell wall/membrane/envelope biogenesis

14

2

4b

Signal transduction mechanisms

3b

0

1b

Secretion

3

0

0

Defense mechanism and virulence

3

2

5b

Secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism

0

0

4

Differentiation

1

1

0

Energy production and conversion

4

4b

2b

Lipid metabolism

1

3

8b

Degradation of aromatic compounds

0

0

1

Carbohydrate metabolism

5

45

36

Amino acid metabolism

14

13

11b

Coenzyme metabolism

1b

0

5

Nucleotide metabolism

1b

1

4b

Inorganic ion metabolism

3

1

2

General function prediction only

9

3

18

Unknown function

47

8

10

aProtein with a spectral counting/MW 5-fold greater in CSM than in CM; bMost or all proteins have a predicted intracellular localisation.

Bradford protein assays estimated supernatant protein concentrations in CM to be 280 ± 113, 275 ± 33 and 217 ± 10 μg/mL in 1-, 3- and 5-day-old cultures, respectively. In CSM, protein concentrations were estimated to be 361 ± 45, 350 ± 13 and 285 ± 9 μg/mL in 1-, 3- and 5-day-old cultures, respectively. This higher production of extracellular proteins in CSM may reflect the recalcitrant nature of suberin [6]. Because of the complexity of plant cell walls, some microorganisms secrete up to 50% of their total protein during growth on such a substrate [14]. Although the majority of the proteins (69.3%) found in the supernatants were predicted to have an extracellular localisation by SignalP, SecretomeP, TatFind or TatP analysis, some proteins with a predicted intracellular location were also identified. The proportion of predicted intracellular proteins recovered in the 3- and 5-day-old culture supernatants was higher in CSM than in CM samples (Table 4). A higher concentration of predicted intracellular proteins in CSM may reflect contamination of the secretome by intracellular content of lysed cells. Most of the proteins included in translational, ribosomal structure and biogenesis, coenzyme metabolism and nucleotide metabolism classes were predicted to be localized in the cytoplasm and were found predominantly in samples grown in CSM (Table 3). Higher levels of lysis in CSM may be due to the fact that monomers associated with the suberin structure act as membrane perturbants [15]. Furthermore, suberin has been shown to increase membrane fluidity in S. scabiei[6].
Table 4

Proportion of predicted extracellular proteins in the secretome Streptomyces scabiei grown in CM of CSM

Cultivation time

Proportion of predicted extracellular proteins (%)

 

CM

CSM

1-day-old culture

73

68

3-day-old culture

87

65

5-day-old culture

88

66

Although both CM and CSM contain casein as carbon and nitrogen sources, 124 different proteins were specifically detected in the CM supernatants, indicating that the presence of suberin might repress expression of several genes (Additional file 2: Table S2). As reported in other proteomic studies [2, 3], a non-negligible number of detected proteins have unknown functions and surprisingly, several proteins of unknown function were associated with growth in CM (Table 3). Proteins included in posttranscriptional modification, protein turnover and chaperones and in cell envelope biogenesis classes were also found in higher proportion in CM-grown samples (Table 3). It has been reported that suberin induces a thickening of the cell wall [6] and the differential production of proteins involved in cell envelope biogenesis suggest that both cell wall structure and composition of S. scabiei may differ depending on the culture media.

Among the 246 proteins associated with both culture media, 41% of them were 5-fold more abundant in CSM after 1, 3 or 5 days of growth (Table 1). A total of 139 proteins were specifically detected in CSM supernatants indicating that the presence of suberin triggers the expression of a number of genes (Table 2). Several of the proteins found in higher proportion in the presence of suberin were classified into the carbohydrate metabolism class and two functional groups of proteins (degradation of aromatic compounds and secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism) were exclusively associated with growth in CSM (Table 3).

In addition, a factor C-like morphological differentiation protein (C9Z7Z7) was more abundant and was detected at an earlier time point in the S. scabiei secretome when the bacterium was grown in the presence of suberin. Promotion of differentiation by suberin in the genus Streptomyces has been previously reported [6]. This promotion might be at least partly due to a higher concentration of the secreted factor C, which is known to play a role in morphological differentiation and to restore wild-type developmental gene expression to an A-factor non-producing mutant of Streptomyces griseus[16]. Furthermore, a factor C null mutant of strain Streptomyces albidoflavus, a common scab-inducing strain, exhibited a bald phenotype and appeared less pathogenic than the wild-type bacteria [17]. Suberin seemed also to promote the initiation of the secondary metabolism that triggered the production of thaxtomin A, a phytotoxin essential for S. scabiei pathogenicity [5].

Abundance of extracellular proteins associated with carbohydrate metabolism in suberin-containing medium

Out of 240 proteins overproduced or exclusively produced in the presence of suberin, 81 (33%) were involved in carbohydrate metabolism (Tables 1 and 2) and 49 of these were identified as glycosyl hydrolases (GH) using CAZy classification (Table 3). Two proteins (C9ZE95 and C9Z5L1) in this class figured among the ten most abundant proteins in the 24-h CSM supernatant. After 5 days of incubation, these two proteins as well as three other proteins of the same class (C9ZD50, C9ZEP9 and C9ZE94) were included in the ten most highly represented proteins in the CSM supernatant. In contrast, no proteins belonging to the carbohydrate metabolism class appeared among the ten most abundant proteins in the CM at any sampling time. This abundance of glycosyl hydrolases in CSM was unexpected considering that this culture medium was not supplemented with polysaccharides. Nevertheless, some of the putative glycosyl hydrolases present in the supernatant were active, since CSM supernatants exhibited cellulase, xylanase and licheninase activities (Table 5).
Table 5

Enzymatic activities (mU/ml) a associated with supernatants of Streptomyces scabiei grown in CM or CSM

 

Xylanase

Cellulase

Licheninase

 

CM

CSM

CM

CSM

CM

CSM

1-day-old culture

0

30.1 ± 7.4

0

12.2 ± 2.1

5.7 ± 2.7

30.8 ± 23.6

3-day-old culture

0

314.0 ± 11.6

0

26.3 ± 4.3

5.1 ± 3.8

50.2 ± 2.5

5-day-old culture

9.7 ± 2.5

372.0 ± 9.0

7.7 ± 0.3

32.8 ± 2.1

64.1 ± 4.9

116.0 ± 4.5

aData are the mean of three replicates.

Production of glycosyl hydrolases in the presence of suberin may be due to the presence of sugar contaminants in suberin. The polymer is anchored in the plant cell wall and is tightly associated with other cell wall components such as polysaccharides [10]. Enzymatic and extractive protocols have been optimized to remove around 95% of the unsuberized cell walls and waxes from suberized potato periderm [18]. Nevertheless, cell wall polysaccharides are covalently attached to the polyester biopolymer and could thus be inaccessible to enzymes used to purify suberin. When grown in the presence of suberin, contaminating cell wall polysaccharides represent a higher carbon energy supply for the bacteria than the aliphatic and aromatic fractions of suberin, explaining the importance of this group of enzymes in S. scabiei secretome.

A set of enzymes possibly involved in xylan catabolism were specific to the suberin-containing medium or were found in higher proportion in the presence of suberin. A putative xylanase A (C9ZE95) was among the most abundant proteins detected in suberin-containing medium at all sampling times and its abundance was between 20 to 26 times higher than in CM samples (Table 1). Complete hydrolysis of xylan requires xylanases such as endo-β-1, 4-xylanases, β-xylosidase and other enzymes that cleave side chain sugars from the xylan backbone, such as α-arabinofuranosidases and acetyl esterases, for example. Most xylanases found in this study belong to glycoside hydrolase families GH5, GH8, GH10, GH11, GH30 and GH43 (CAZy classification [19]).

Some of the proteins detected only in CSM and included in the carbohydrate metabolism class were putative polysaccharide lyases (C9YU66, C9YYE6, C9YYF0, C9Z574 and C9Z725) or carbohydrate esterases (C9YVN4, C9YVP5, C9YYE7, C9YYE8 and C9ZE74). Among them, proteins C9YYE6, C9YYE7 and C9YYE8, encoded by three adjacent genes, were predicted to belong to an operon of four genes (http://www.microbesonline.org/operons/gnc680198.html) and are probably involved in pectin degradation. The fourth gene of the operon encodes for the lipolytic enzyme C9YYE5, which was also only detected in suberin-containing medium.

In addition to enzymes involved in xylan and pectin degradation, other types of polysaccharide-degrading enzymes were detected specifically in CSM: cellulases (C9YVP5, C9YW88 and C9ZEQ1), a putative licheninase (C9Z623) and several enzymes involved in the hydrolysis of hemicellulose compounds. Glycosyl hydrolase activity in CS and CSM supernatants has been assayed on cellulose, xylan and lichenin and our experiments revealed that CSM supernatants possessed higher cellulase, xylanase and licheninase activity (Table 5). Furthermore, addition of a small amount of suberin to S. scabiei culture media containing carboxymethyl cellulose or xylan as the main carbon source considerably increased the cellulase and xylanase activities, respectively (unpublished data). Given that the amount of suberin added in the culture media is relatively small, the increase in enzymatic activity is unlikely to be attributable to contamination of the suberin polymer with cellulose or xylan. This increase might be due to the secretion of glycosyl hydrolases specifically induced by the presence of suberin or to an overproduction of extracellular enzymes caused by the addition of suberin. Phenolic suberin compounds might be partly responsible for the high glycosyl hydrolase activity since various phenolic compounds such as gallic acid, tannic acid, maleic acid and salicylic acid were shown to induce expression of various genes encoding cellulases [20]. The promotion of secondary metabolism by suberin [6] could also explain this overproduction as the A-factor regulon includes many extracellular glycosyl hydrolases in S. griseus[21].

Topochemical studies have shown that a part of the suberin polyaromatic domain is located in the primary and tertiary cell walls [10]. Polyaromatic compounds from suberin are thus associated with polysaccharide-type glycosides but the nature of their covalent link remains speculative [10]. The fact that several secreted carbohydrate esterases identified in this study belonged to carbohydrate esterase families CE1, CE2, CE7 and CE12 (Table 3) that include acetyl xylan esterases and pectin acetyl esterases suggests that the polyaromatic fraction of suberin, like lignin, another polyaromatic structure, is linked to cell wall polysaccharides by ester bonds [22].

Identification of extracellular proteins possibly involved in suberin degradation

The main purpose of this work was to identify extracellular proteins produced in the presence of suberin, the main constituent of potato periderm. Suberin is an insoluble lipidic biopolymer [10] and the mechanisms responsible for its degradation are poorly understood [11]. Nevertheless, some authors have suggested that actinobacteria, including S. scabiei[6, 12], might be involved in the degradation of the aliphatic portion of suberin.

Interestingly, most proteins of the lipid metabolism class have been detected only in the supernatant of CSM (C9YTK3, C9YYE5, C9YY49, C9ZD66, C9ZGV4, C9Z6Y2, C9Z7Q3 and C9Z776) or were more abundant in this medium (C9ZCR0, C9Z5Z2 and C9Z707). Four of these proteins, a protein from the esterase-lipase family (C9YTK3), a lipolytic enzyme (C9YYE5), a glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase (C9Z5Z2) and a putative sphingolipid ceramide N-deacylase (C9ZCR0) have a predicted extracellular localisation and could thus be directly involved in suberin degradation.

Current models for suberin structure postulate that approximately 25% of the suberin structure can be depolymerized by ester cleavage reactions [8]. The predicted function of C9YTK3 and C9YYE5 suggests that these proteins could hydrolyze esters of fatty acids. They could thus be of importance in attacking the aliphatic structure of suberin or in liberating glycerol from fatty acids. Expression of the corresponding four genes was compared in CM and CSM (Table 6). The esterase/lipase gene was only slightly overexpressed in the presence of suberin while the gene coding for the lipolytic enzyme was more than ten-fold overexpressed after 2 to 5 days of incubation in the presence of suberin. Although suberin induced a considerable increase in expression of the gene encoding the lipolytic enzyme, the corresponding protein was present at a low concentration in CSM and was detected only in a 1-day-old culture medium. Komeil et al. (2013) [12] identified sub1, a potential suberinase gene in S. scabiei genome. The sub1 gene was specifically expressed in the presence of suberin but the Sub1 protein has never been detected in the S. scabiei secretome. Because the aliphatic constituents of suberin act as cell membrane peturbants [15], a low production of lipolytic enzymes might be required for bacterial survival.
Table 6

Effect of suberin on Streptomyces scabiei gene expression

Gene assignation

Protein assignation

Putative function

Relative gene expressiona

   

Day 2

Day 3

Day 4

Day 5

SCAB_3891

C9YSS1

α-galactosidase

7.3 ± 3.5b

6.3 ± 3.2b

3.4 ± 1.0b

3.4 ± 1.1b

SCAB_6001

C9YVP7

Feruloyl esterase

29.6 ± 14.8b

74.0 ± 24.0b

78.0 ± 23.6b

159.3 ± 14.3b

SCAB_51091

C9YTK3

Esterase-lipase

1.8 ± 0.6b

1.9 ± 0.5b

0.8 ± 0.1

1.5 ± 0.4

SCAB_57301

C9Z2P6

3-oxo-5.6-dehydrosuberyl-CoA semialdehyde dehydrogenase

1.7 ± 0.6b

2.3 ± 1.2

1.2 ± 0.6

1.0 ± 0.3

SCAB_70541

C9YYE5

Lipolytic enzyme

3.6 ± 1.3b

9.4 ± 4.1b

6.5 ± 0.9b

12.9 ± 1.3b

SCAB_74351

C9Z5Z2

Glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase

2.0 ± 0.5b

3.6 ± 0.9b

1.2 ± 0.5

1.2 ± 0.1

SCAB_78851

C9ZCR0

Sphingolipid ceramide N-deacylase

1.2 ± 0.4

4.6 ± 1.7b

1.8 ± 0.2b

1.3 ± 0.3

SCAB_79261

C9ZE96

Feruloyl esterase

298.3 ± 184.3b

298.6 ± 81.0b

301.0 ± 73.6b

342.0 ± 46.3b

aData are the mean of four replicates; bGene expression was significantly different between growth conditions.

The C9Z5Z2 protein is a putative glycerophosphoryl diester phosphodiesterase involved in metabolism of glycerol and lipids and the corresponding gene was overexpressed in the first days of growth in the presence of suberin (Table 6). Glycerol has been reported to be covalently bound to the aliphatic and aromatic fractions of potato suberin, allowing the formation of a three-dimensional crosslinked network [8]. During its interaction with potato tubers, S. scabiei may thus release glycerol from suberin and use this compound as a carbon source. Furthermore, suberin depolymerisation by methanolysis was shown to release a set of glycerol-derived dimeric and trimeric esters [10]. Among glycerol esters, monoacylglycerols of α,ω-diacids and of ω-hydroxyacids were found in high concentrations. The putative sphingolipid ceramide N-deacylase C9ZCR0 that is overproduced in the presence of suberin might thus remove acyl groups from monoacylglycerol present in the polymer. C9ZCR0 as well as C9YSS1, a putative α-galactosidase, are related to enzymes involved in sphingolipid degradation (based on KEGG pathway database [23]) and like suberin, sphingolipids also contain long chain fatty acids. The genes encoding C9ZCR0 and C9YSS1 were overexpressed in the presence of suberin (Table 6).

Esterases exhibit activity on a wide range of substrates [24]. As such, esterases not specifically produced in the presence of suberin, for instance C9ZG71 (esterase A) and C9Z6Y6 (cholesterol esterase), might nevertheless play a role in suberin degradation (Additional file 1: Table S1). In a previous study, esterase A was detected in S. scabiei suberin-containing culture medium [12]. C9Z6Y6 is a widespread cholesterol esterase belonging to the lipase/esterase family [25] and it is able to hydrolyze fatty acid esters of cholesterols. Cholesterol esterases have also been characterized in bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa[26], Acinetobacter sp. [27] and Streptomyces spp. [28], suggesting that these bacterial enzymes do not use cholesterol as a specific substrate.

Apart from lipid metabolism proteins, accessory proteins may also actively participate in the breakdown of suberin architecture. That is the case for two feruloyl esterases (C9ZE96 and C9YVP7) included in the general function class (Tables 1 and 2). Feruloyl esterase C9ZE96 was overproduced in the presence of suberin while C9YVP7 was only found in CSM. Both feruloyl esterase genes were clearly overexpressed in the presence of suberin (between 30 to 340 times from days 2 to 5, Table 6). The potato suberin feruloyl transferase FHT, which catalyzes the transfer of ferulic acid to ω-hydroxyfatty acids and fatty alcohols, was shown to be essential for periderm maturation [29], and potatoes deficient in FHT display a periderm that is over ten times more permeable to water compared to wild-type potatoes [30]. Since suberin structure models suggest that ferulate links the aliphatic fraction to the aromatic fractions of suberin [10], feruloyl esterases may possibly disassociate the two suberin domains, making the substrate more accessible to hydrophilic enzymes. Alternatively or concomitantly, these enzymes may, as in some fungi, be responsible for cleaving ester links between polysaccharides such as xylan or pectin and ferulic acid, an aromatic residue [31].

Bacterial degradation of suberin aromatic fractions has, to our knowledge, never been documented. Only one extracellular protein in CSM could be linked to the degradation of aromatic compounds (Table 2). C9Z2P6 is a putative 3-oxo-5,6-dehydrosuberyl-CoA semialdehyde dehydrogenase that belongs to the phenylacetate catabolic pathway of aromatic compounds [32]. The gene encoding C9Z2P6 was overexpressed approximately 2-fold in the presence of suberin after the first day of growth (Table 6).

Suberin is a determining factor in the outcome of S. scabiei-potato tuber interaction. Suberin induces the onset of virulence mechanisms of S. scabiei[5]. In potato tuber, suberin biosynthesis is induced in response of S. scabiei infection offering a physical protection to pathogen entry [33]. A recent study has effectively shown that enhanced suberin production in potato tubers provides protection against common scab [34]. Degradation of suberin by S. scabiei may contribute to nutrient acquisition during both parasitic and saprophytic modes of life. Nevertheless, elucidating the involvement of suberin in the different steps of bacterial infection is still difficult as the suberin degradation process remains highly speculative.

Conclusions

This study has allowed the identification of various extracellular enzymes that could be involved in suberin degradation (lipolytic enzymes, deacylases, feruloyl esterases) or in degradation of other potato cell wall constituents. Cellulases, xylanases or pectinases associated with S. scabiei have never been characterized although their role in pathogenicity may be of importance. Presence in S. scabiei secretome of numerous enzymes implicated in carbohydrate metabolism is unlikely to be attributable to sugar contamination of the suberin polymer, suberin rather appears to stimulate the production of such enzymes. Further study on these proteins could provide a new source of knowledge to unravel the molecular basis of S. scabiei virulence mechanisms.

Methods

Bacteria, growth conditions and inoculation

The pathogenic Streptomyces scabiei strain EF-35 was isolated from a common scab lesion from a potato tuber collected in Canada [2]. Bacterial inoculum was prepared as follows. Approximately 108 spores were added to 25 mL of yeast malt extract (YME, 4 g/L of glucose, 4 g/L of yeast extract and 10 g/L of malt extract; BD, Detroit, MI, USA) and incubated with shaking (250 r/min) for 48 h at 30°C. The bacterial culture was then centrifuged (2500 × g) for 5 min and the supernatant discarded. Bacterial pellets were subsequently resuspended in 5 volumes of 0.85% NaCl. In all experiments, an inoculum of 200 μL was transferred to 50 mL of minimal medium supplemented with 0.1% suberin and 0.05% casein hydrolysate (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), or casein hydrolysate only. Suberin was extracted from potato tubers according to Lerat et al. (2012) [6]. Three culture replicates for each medium were incubated with shaking (250 r/min) at 30°C for 1, 3 or 5 days.

Extracellular protein extraction

The protein concentrations of S. scabiei supernatant samples were measured according to Bradford (1976) [35] with bovine serum albumin used as a standard. The absorbance of the solution at 595 nm was measured after 5 min of incubation at room temperature. A standard curve prepared with known concentrations of bovine serum albumin was used to determine the sample protein concentrations.

Extracellular proteins were recovered by centrifuging bacterial cultures at 2500 × g for 15 min at 4°C. Proteins in the supernatants were concentrated to a final volume of 500 μL using Amicon® Ultra-15 Centrifugal Filters-3 K followed by addition of 5 volumes of 100% pre-chilled acetone. After 3 h of incubation at 20°C, proteins were recovered by centrifugation (14000 × g, 20 min, 4°C). Protein pellets were air dried and resuspended in 80 μL of a buffer composed of 8 M urea, 2% (w/v) CHAPS, 2% (v/v) IPG buffer pH 4 7 (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK), 18.15 mM DTT and 0.002% bromophenol blue stock solution in 50 mM Tris-base. A centrifugation (14000 × g) was then carried out for 5 min at 4°C to remove insoluble material.

Enzymatic assays

Cellulase, licheninase and xylanase activities in S. scabiei culture supernatants were determined according to Lever (1972) [36]. Briefly, each supernatant sample (100 μL) was added to 400 μL of 0.1% (w/v) of carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) or 0.1% (w/v) xylan or 0.1% (w/v) lichenin and the mixtures were incubated at 50°C for 30 min. The enzymatic reaction was stopped by adding 1 mL of PAHBAH solution (NaOH 5 M, trisodium citrate 0.5 M, NaSO3 1 M, CaCl2 0.2 M and 10 g/L of p-hydroxy benzoic acid hydrazide). Samples were subsequently boiled for 30 min to allow color development. The vials were then placed on ice for 5 min. Insoluble material was eliminated by centrifugation (14000 × g, 5 min). The same procedure was carried out for the blank control samples, but PAHBAH solution was added to the supernatant sample before incubation at 50°C. The optical density of each test and blank samples was determined at 405 nm with a spectrophotometer (Ultrospec 3000-Biochrom). One unit of enzyme activity was defined as the amount of enzyme releasing 1 μmol of reducing sugar per min.

One-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Extracellular proteins were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (10% SDS-PAGE). Each protein sample consisted of 9 μL of concentrated proteins and 3 μL of loading buffer (0.5 M Tris–HCl, pH 6.8, 50% [v/v] glycerol, 10% [w/v] SDS, 5% [v/v] β-mercaptoethanol, and 0.05% [w/v] bromophenol blue) in a 12 μL final volume. The proteins were denaturated by incubating the samples at 100°C for 5 min before electrophoresis. Electrophoresis was carried out using a BioRad Mini Protean® Tetra Cell (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 100 V for 60 min with a 3-(N-morpholino) propanesulfonic acid (MOPS) running buffer containing 50 mM MOPS, 50 mM Tris, 0.1% SDS, and 0.03% (w/v) EDTA. The protein molecular weight markers used were PageRuler™ Prestained Protein Ladder (Thermo Scientific, Ottawa, Canada). Proteins were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue R-250 (Bio-Rad) [2]. Individual protein bands were excised from the SDS-PAGE gels and separated into two groups according to protein band intensity (low and high intensity).

In-gel digestion of proteins and mass spectrometry

In-gel digestion and mass spectrometry were carried out at the Proteomics Platform of the Quebec Genomics Center (Quebec City, Canada). Proteins were in-gel digested with trypsin using a MassPrep liquid handling robot (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) according to Shevchenko et al. (1996) [37] with modifications as suggested by Havliš et al. (2003) [38]. Briefly, the excised slices were destained in a solution containing 50 μL of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate and 50 μL acetonitrile, washed once with 50 μL of 100 mM ammonium bicarbonate and dehydrated with 50 μL of acetonitrile. The proteins were in-gel reduced with 10 mM DTT for 30 min at 37°C and alkylated with 55 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min at room temperature. Proteins were digested with 105 mM sequencing grade modified porcine trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at 58°C for 1 h. Digestion products were first extracted with a solution of 1% formic acid and 2% acetonitrile, then with a solution of 1% formic acid and 50% acetonitrile. The recovered peptide extracts were pooled, dried in a vacuum centrifuge and resuspended in 5 μL of 0.1% formic acid. Peptides were separated in a PicoFrit column BioBasic C18, 10 cm × 0.075 mm internal diameter (New Objective, Woburn, MA, USA) with a linear gradient (2% to 50% acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid) in 30 min at 200 nl/min. The samples were then transferred on a Thermo Surveyor MS pump connected to a LTQ linear ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA) equipped with a nanoelectrospray ion source (Thermo Electron). Xcalibure 2.0 software was used for mass spectra acquisition. Each full-scan mass spectrum (400–2000 m/z) was followed by collision-induced dissociation of the seven most intense ions (30 s dynamic exclusion duration and 35% relative collisional fragmentation energy).

Interpretation of tandem MS spectra

All MS/MS spectra were analysed for peptide identification using Mascot (Matrix Science, London, UK; version 2.2.0). Mascot parameters were set to search the Streptomyces Uniref100 database, based on trypsin digestion, with a fragment ion mass tolerance of 0.5 Da and a parent ion tolerance of 2.0 Da. The following search criteria were used: two missed cleavages were allowed, iodoacetamide derivative of cysteine was specified as a fixed modification and oxidation of methionine was specified as a variable modification. Peptide tolerance was 2.0 Da for the precursor and 0.5 Da for MS/MS. Score Mascot corresponded to 10 × log(P), where P is the probability that the observed match with a given MS/MS spectra is a random event.

Protein label-free spectral counting, identification and characterisation

Scaffold software program (version Scaffold 4.0.5, Proteome Software, Portland, OR, USA) was used to group peptides into protein and sum spectral counts for each protein. Protein identifications were accepted if they obtained a 99% minimum protein ID probability and presented a minimum of two unique peptides in which the cut offs for peptide thresholds were 90%. Identified proteins were re-annotated and queried against GenBank sequence databases. Protein functions and assignment to functional groups were predicted using tools such as PRIAM [39], CAZy database [19], KEGG resources [40], COG database [41] and MicrobesOnLine resources [42]. Cellular localization of the proteins was predicted by Phobius [43], SignalP 4.1 [44], SecretomeP [45], TatP [46] and Tatfind 1.4 [47] analysis.

Analysis of relative gene expression

The expression of genes SCAB_6001, SCAB_51091, SCAB_70541, SCAB_74351, SCAB_78851, SCAB_79251 and SCAB_84861 was monitored over time. S. scabiei EF-35 was grown for 5 days in casein-containing minimal medium, supplemented or not with suberin (see above for details, four replicates per medium). From 2 to 5 days after inoculation, bacterial cultures were sub-sampled (10 mL) every 24 h to extract total RNA. Sampling procedures, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis were carried out as in Lerat et al. (2010) [5]. Real-time RT-PCR was then performed on 2 μL of 10× diluted cDNA (in a final volume of 20 μL) using iTaq Universal SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad). Primers used for the amplification of the seven above-mentioned genes and the reference gene gyrA are supplied in supplementary data (Additional file 3: Table S3). PCR conditions were: 3 min at 95°C followed by 35 cycles of 15 s at 95°C and 30 s at 60°C. Relative gene expression was calculated according to Pfaffl (2001) [48].

Abbreviations

LC-MS/MS: 

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry

MW: 

Molecular weight

CM: 

Casein medium

CSM: 

Casein suberin medium.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Chantal Binda for reviewing the manuscript. This work is supported by the National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. DK was financially supported by a Ph.D. scholarship from the Ministry of Higher Education, Egypt.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Centre SÈVE, Département de biologie, Université de Sherbrooke
(2)
Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Alexandria

References

  1. Knief C, Delmotte N, Vorholt JA: Bacterial adaptation to life in association with plants - A proteomic perspective from culture to in situ conditions. Proteomics 2011, 11: 3086–3105.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Lauzier A, Simao-Beaunoir A-M, Bourassa S, Poirier GG, Talbot B, Beaulieu C: Effect of potato suberin on Streptomyces scabies proteome. Mol Plant Pathol 2008, 9: 753–762.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Joshi MV, Mann SG, Antelmann H, Widdick DA, Fyans JK, Chandra G, Hutchings MI, Toth I, Hecker M, Loria R, Palmer T: The twin arginine protein transport pathway exports multiple virulence proteins in the plant pathogen Streptomyces scabies . Mol Microbiol 2010, 77: 252–271.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulieu C, Goyer C, Beaudoin N: Interactions between pathogenic streptomycetes and plants: The role of thaxtomins. In Plant-Microbe Interactions. Edited by: Ait Barka E, Clément C. Trivandrum: Research Signpost; 2008:117–133.Google Scholar
  5. Lerat S, Simao-Beaunoir A-M, Wu R, Beaudoin N, Beaulieu C: Involvement of the plant polymer suberin and the disaccharide cellobiose in triggering thaxtomin a biosynthesis, a phytotoxin produced by the pathogenic agent Streptomyces scabies . Phytopathology 2010, 100: 91–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lerat S, Forest M, Lauzier A, Grondin G, Lacelle S, Beaulieu C: Potato suberin induces differentiation and secondary metabolism in the genus Streptomyces . Microbes Environ 2012, 27: 36–42.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernards MA, Razem FA: The poly(phenolic) domain of potato suberin: A non-lignin cell wall bio-polymer. Phytochemistry 2001, 57: 1115–1122.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Graça J, Pereira H: Suberin structure in potato periderm: glycerol, long-chain monomers, and glyceryl and feruloyl dimers. J Agric Food Chem 2000, 48: 5476–5483.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Santos S, Cabral V, Graça J: Cork suberin molecular structure: Stereochemistry of the C18 epoxy and vic-diol ω-hydroxyacids and, α, ω-diacids analyzed by NMR. J Agric Food Chem 2013, 61: 7038–7047.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Graça J, Santos S: Suberin: a biopolyester of plants' skin. Macromol Biosci 2007, 7: 128–135.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kontkanen H, Westerholm-Parvinen A, Saloheimo M, Bailey M, Rättö M, Mattila I, Mohsina M, Kalkkinen N, Nakari-Setälä T, Buchert J: Novel Coprinopsis cinerea polyesterase that hydrolyzes cutin and suberin. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75: 2148–2157.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Komeil D, Simao-Beaunoir A-M, Beaulieu C: Detection of potential suberinase-encoding genes in Streptomcyes scabiei strains and other actinobacteria. Can J Microbiol 2013, 59: 294–303.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Prieto JH, Koncarevic S, Park SK, Yates J III, Becker K: Large-scale differential proteome analysis in Plasmodium falciparum under drug treatment. PLoS One 2008, 3: e4098.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilson DB: Microbial diversity of cellulose hydrolysis. Curr Opin Microbiol 2011, 14: 259–263.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Douliez JP: Cutin ans suberin monomers are membrane perturbants. J Colloid Interface Sci 2004, 271: 507–510.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Birkó Z, Swiatek M, Szájli E, Medzihradszky KF, Vijgenboom E, Penyige A, Keseru J, Van Wezel GP, Biro S: Lack of A-factor production induces the expression of nutrient scavenging and stress-related proteins in Streptomyces griseus . Mol Cell Proteomics 2009, 8: 2396–2403.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Kiss Z, Dobránszki J, Hudák I, Birkó Z, Vargha G, Biró S: The possible role of factor C in common scab disease development. Acta Biol Hung 2010, 61: 322–332.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Stark RE, Sohn W, Pacchiano RA Jr, Al-Bashir M, Garbow JR: Following suberization in potato wound periderm by histochemical and solid-state 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance methods. Plant Physiol 1994, 104: 527–533.PubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B: The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res 2014,42(D1):D490-D495.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar R, Singh S, Singh OV: Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass: biochemical and molecular perspectives. J Ind MicrobioI Biotechnol 2008, 35: 377–391.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Akanuma G, Hara H, Ohnishi Y, Horinouchi S: Dynamic changes in the extracellular proteome caused by absence of a pleiotropic regulator AdpA in Streptomyces griseus . Mol Microbiol 2009, 73: 898–912.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawoko M: Unveiling the structure and ultrastructure of lignin carbohydrate complexes in softwoods. Int J Biol Macromol 2013, 62: 705–713.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ogata H, Goto S, Sato K, Fujibuchi W, Bono H, Kanehisa M: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1999, 27: 29–34.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta R, Gupta N, Rathi P: Bacterial lipases: an overview of production, purification and biochemical properties. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2004, 64: 763–781.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Brockerhoff H: Model of interaction of polar lipids, cholesterol, and proteins in biological membranes. Lipids 1974, 9: 645–650.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sugihara A, Shimada Y, Nomura A, Terai T, Imayasu M, Nagai Y, Nagao T, Watanabe Y, Tominaga Y: Purification and characterization of a novel cholesterol esterase from Pseudomonas aeruginosa , with its application to cleaning lipid-stained contact lenses. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2002, 66: 2347–2355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Du L, Huo Y, Ge F, Yu J, Li W, Cheng G, Yong B, Zeng L, Huang M: Purification and characterization of novel extracellular cholesterol esterase from Acinetobacter sp. J Basic Microbiol 2010, 50: S30-S36.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Xiang H, Masuo S, Hoshino T, Takaya N: Novel family of cholesterol esterases produced by actinomycetes bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 2007, 1774: 112–120.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Boher P, Serra O, Soler M, Molinas M, Figueras M: The potato suberin feruloyl transferase FHT which accumulates in the phellogen is induced by wounding and regulated by abscisic and salicylic acids. J Exp Bot 2013, 64: 3225–3236.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Serra O, Hohn C, Franke R, Prat S, Molinas M, Figueras M: A feruloyl transferase involved in the biosynthesis of suberin and suberin-associated wax is required for maturation and sealing properties of potato periderm. Plant J 2010, 62: 277–290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Topakas E, Vafiadi C, Christakopoulos P: Microbial production, characterization and applications of feruloyl esterases. Process Biochem 2007, 42: 497–509.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Diaz E, Jiménez JI, Nogales J: Aerobic degradation of aromatic compounds. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2013, 24: 431–442.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kathri BB, Tegg RS, Brown PH, Wilson CR: Temporal association of potato tuber development with susceptibility to common scab and Streptomyces scabiei -induced responses in the potato periderm. Plant Pathol 2011, 60: 776–786.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Thangavel T, Tegg RS, Wilson CR: Enhanced suberin production in novel potato somaclones provides protective bio-barrier against two key scab diseases. Fremantle, Australia: Proceedings of the 7th Australasian Soilborne Diseases Symposium (ASDS); 2012:17–20. in pressGoogle Scholar
  35. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72: 248–254.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lever M: A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates. Anal Biochem 1972, 47: 273–279.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Shevchenko A, Wilm M, Vorm O, Mann M: Mass spectrometric sequencing of proteins from silver-stained polyacrylamide gels. Anal Chem 1996, 68: 850–858.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Havliš J, Thomas H, Šebela M, Shevchenko A: Fast-response proteomics by accelerated in-gel digestion of proteins. Anal Chem 2003, 75: 1300–1306.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Claudel-Renard C, Chevalet C, Faraut T, Kahn D: Enzyme-specific profiles for genome annotation: PRIAM. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31: 6633–6639.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M: The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32: D277-D280.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tatusov RL, Koonin EV, Lipman DJ: A genomic perspective on protein families. Science 1997, 278: 631–637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Dehal PS, Joachimiak MP, Price MN, Bates JT, Baumohl JK, Chivian D, Friedland GD, Huang KH, Keller K, Novichkov PS, Dubchak IL, Alm EJ, Arkin AP: MicrobesOnline: an integrated portal for comparative and functional genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38: D396-D400.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Käll L, Krogh A, Sonnhammer ELL: Advantages of combined transmembrane topology and signal peptide prediction–the Phobius web server. Nucleic Acids Res 2007, 35: 429–432.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Petersen TN, Brunak S, Von Heijne G, Nielsen H: SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods 2011, 8: 785–786.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Bendtsen JD, Kiemer L, Fausbøll A, Brunak S: Non-classical protein secretion in bacteria. BMC Microbiol 2005, 5: 58.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Bendtsen JD, Nielsen H, Widdick D, Palmer T, Brunak S: Prediction of twin-arginine signal peptides. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6: 167.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Rose RW, Brüser T, Kissinger JC, Pohlschröder M: Adaptation of protein secretion to extremely high salt concentrations by extensive use of the twin arginine translocation pathway. Mol Microbiol 2002, 5: 943–950.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Pfaffl MW: A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001, 29: 2002–2007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Komeil et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement