Open Access

Towards further defining the proteome of mouse saliva

  • Anne A Blanchard1, 2,
  • Peyman Ezzati3,
  • Dmitry Shamshurin3,
  • Andreea C Nistor1,
  • Etienne Leygue4,
  • John A Wilkins3 and
  • Yvonne Myal1, 2Email author
Proteome Science201513:10

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-015-0068-3

Received: 25 November 2014

Accepted: 13 February 2015

Published: 25 February 2015

Abstract

Background

Knowledge of the mouse salivary proteome is not well documented and as a result, very limited. Currently, several salivary proteins remain unidentified and for some others, their function yet to be determined. The goal of the present study is to utilize mass spectrometry analysis to widen our knowledge of mouse salivary proteins, and through extensive database searches, provide further insight into the array of proteins that can be found in saliva. A comprehensive mouse salivary proteome will also facilitate the development of mouse models to study specific biomarkers of many human diseases.

Results

Individual saliva samples were collected from male and female mice, and later pooled according to sex. Two pools of saliva from female mice (2 samples/pool) and 2 pools of saliva from male mice were used for analysis utilizing high performance liquid chromatograph mass spectrometry (nano-RPLC-MS/MS). The resulting datasets identified 345 proteins: 174 proteins were represented in saliva obtained from both sexes, as well as 82 others that were more female specific and 89 that were more male specific. Of these sex linked proteins, twelve were identified as exclusively sex-limited; 10 unique to males and 2 unique to females. Functional analysis of the 345 proteins identified 128 proteins with catalytic activity characteristics; indicative of proteins involved in digestion, and 35 proteins associated with stress response, host defense, and wound healing functions. Submission of the list of 345 proteins to the BioMart data mining tool in the Ensembl database further allowed us to identify a total of 283 orthologous human genes, of which, 131 proteins were recently reported to be present in the human salivary proteome.

Conclusions

The present study is the most comprehensive list to date of the proteins that constitute the mouse salivary proteome. The data presented can serve as a useful resource for identifying potentially useful biomarkers of human health and disease.

Keywords

Mouse/Human saliva Biomarkers Mouse salivary proteome Mass spectrometry Kallikreins

Background

The oral cavity is a unique environment colonized by bacteria and bathed in salivary fluid. Primarily considered as a component of the digestive process, saliva contains enzymes, including proteases, lipases and glycohydrolases which initiate partial digestion of food components [1]. Many of these enzymes are of bacterial origin and not derived from the salivary glands [1]. Salivary proteins also interact with the oral flora by binding microorganisms, resulting in their aggregation and facilitating their clearance from the oral cavity, serving as receptors for microbial adhesion to host surfaces, possessing antibacterial activity, or serving as microbial nutritional substrates [2]. Thus, saliva and the oral flora are intricately involved in the protection of the oral cavity.

Knowledge of the complexity of saliva in recent years has been expanded such that the term “salivaomics” was coined and is now used to encompass the salivary proteome, transcriptome, microRNA, metabolome and microbiome [3]. These “omes” form the platform for investigating salivary biomarkers for disorders ranging from cancer to infectious disease. The identification of salivary biomarkers of both oral and systemic disease has been a vigorously pursued area of research, primarily attributed to the fact that saliva collection is non-invasive, safe and inexpensive [1,4]. Salivary transcriptome and microbiota biomarkers were recently identified as diagnostic indicators of pancreatic cancer [5], and oral cancer [6] respectively. As well, soluble epidermal growth factor B2 (c-erbB2) has been identified in saliva of women with breast cancer [7]. Therefore salivaomics have shown much promise in cancer biomarker discovery [8].

Although saliva as a proximal biofluid of oral disease is intuitive, the detection of systemic disease is less clear. The mechanisms by which systemic disorders influence the salivome are not well understood. One proposed hypothesis is that blood-derived molecules enter salivary tissues via transcellular or paracellular routes and could potentially influence the molecular constituency of oral fluids [9,10]. More recently, the salivary proteome was shown to be altered through exosomes, microvesicular structures which deliver their contents from distal sites to other parts of the body including the salivary glands [3]. In cancer, it has been demonstrated that tumor-shed exosomes can shuttle proteins and other microbiological components to saliva, thereby altering both the proteome [11] as well as the transcriptome [12] of saliva.

To contribute to the goal of discovery of biomarkers from the salivary proteome, it is important to identify and catalogue the proteins in normal saliva. The human salivary proteome from healthy individuals was recently reported [13,14]. Knowledge of the salivary proteome of other species have not been well documented, with the exception of recent reports of the salivary proteome of goats and sheep [15], the bovine salivary proteome [16], and two recent studies of mouse saliva [17,18]. The most recent analysis of the mouse salivary proteome identified only 81 proteins [17], and therefore, a more in-depth analysis of the mouse salivary proteome is warranted.

The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive listing by utilizing mass spectrometry analysis of the proteins that constitute the mouse salivary proteome, and to provide a reference list necessary for the utilization of mouse models in the study of salivary biomarkers. We report the most comprehensive list to date of proteins which constitute the mouse salivary proteome. Importantly, we also identify those proteins that were found common to both mouse and human. Our study contributes new knowledge to this growing field of proteomics that could also facilitate the diagnosis of human disease in a non-invasive way.

Results and discussion

Identification of novel proteins in mouse saliva

To identify the protein composition, saliva samples from both male and female mice were subjected to analysis by mass spectrometry as described in “Methods”. Datasets from each of the 2 pools of saliva from female mice (2 pools, 2 mice per pool) were combined. Following the removal of duplicates, and implementation of a minimum criterion of two unique peptides and a score above −2 a list of 256 proteins was identified (Additional file 1). Analysis of saliva from the male mice resulted in a list of 263 proteins (Additional file 2). After merging the lists of proteins identified in males (263) with the proteins identified in females (256) and removing duplicates, 345 mouse salivary proteins were identified in this study (Additional file 3). Of the 345 proteins, 174 were found in both males and females, 89 were identified only in male saliva, while 82 were female specific (Figure 1). Importantly, these datasets represent the highest number of proteins identified to date from mouse saliva since a recently published list comprised of only 81 proteins [17].
Figure 1

Venn diagrams of the protein datasets identified in mouse saliva. Two pools of female mice saliva (Female P1, Female P2) and 2 pools of male saliva (Male P1 and Male P2) were used in generating the Venn Diagram. Following the removal of duplicates, the datasets derived from the Female P1 and Female P2 were then combined, to generate a list of 256 proteins (Additional file 1). Further analysis revealed 154 proteins common to both pools of saliva. Similarly, datasets from the 2 male saliva pools were combined, resulting in a list of 263 proteins (Additional file 2). The compilation of data from Male P1 and Male P2 identified 159 proteins present in both samples. Datasets from the males and females were then combined to identify a total of 345 proteins: 174 proteins confirmed in datasets from both sexes as well as 82 proteins unique to the saliva from females and 89 unique to males (Additional file 3).

Delineating protein function through database analysis

Functionally, the majority of proteins identified to date that are found in saliva fall into two categories: digestion and protection [1]. Therefore such findings would not be unexpected among the 345 we identified in this study. To investigate function, proteins were submitted to UniProt gene ontology database analysis [19]. One hundred and twenty-eight proteins were found to have catalytic activity, indicative of proteins involved in digestion. Of these, the largest group was the hydrolases, which include the kallikreins, cathepsins, amylases (Amy1, Amy2), adenosine deaminase (Ada), lactotransferin (Ltf), and chitinase (Chia). Twenty-nine additional proteins were identified as having enzyme regulatory activity components, the largest sub-group being the peptidase inhibitors which included the serpins and whey acidic protein (WAP) four disulfide core domain proteins (Wfdc2, Wfdc12, Wfdc18).

Expectedly, we also identified several proteins that play a role in protection of the teeth and soft tissues of the mouth, and non-immune host defense. It is well recognized that many salivary proteins interact with the microbiota of the oral cavity to promote the colonization of beneficial strains or the clearance of undesirable ones [2,20]. Of particular interest is the prolactin inducible protein, Pip, a protein first identified by us and shown to be highly abundant in both mouse and human saliva [21,22], and was found to be abundant in all 4 saliva sample pools (2 female pools, 2 male pools). We have previously shown that Pip can aggregate oral bacteria [23] inhibiting their activity. Further, using a Pip knockout mouse model we demonstrated that loss of Pip function had significant effects on both the diversity of the oral flora and abundance of specific bacteria of the oral cavity of the Pip null mouse [24]. One hundred and twenty-seven proteins that respond to stimuli were identified; 61 in response to stress stimuli, such as defense response (28 proteins), and wound healing (7 proteins). There was often overlap with regards to protein function and thus many fell into more than one category. Consequently, we combined the defense and wound healing linked proteins into one table which was comprised of 35 proteins (Table 1). Interestingly, the involvement of saliva in wound healing has long been recognized by oral surgeons and indigenous people as well [1].
Table 1

Mouse saliva proteins involved in host defense and wound healing

UniProt accession

Gene symbol

Gene ontology (GO)

Q14BX6

4933415F23Rik

innate immune response; regulation of phosphorylation

P29699

Ahsg

positive regulation of phagocytosis; regulation of inflammatory response

Q61176

Arg1

response to interleukin-4, lipopolysaccharide, transforming growth factor beta

P01887

B2m

defense response; phagocytic vesicle membrane; positive regulation of T cell mediated cytotoxicity; response to bacteria

P97361

Bpifa1

antibacterial humoral response; innate immune response

Q61114

Bpifb1

innate immune response

P01027

C3

complement activation; inflammatory response; positive regulation of phagocytosis

Q91XA9

Chia

immune system process; positive regulation of chemokine secretion

O35744

Chil3

inflammatory response

P11087

Col1a1

response to transforming growth factor beta stimuli; tooth mineralization; wound healing

O88207

Col5a1

cell adhesion; collagen biosynthetic process; extracellular fibril organization; wound healing

Q9WVJ3

Cpq

carboxypeptidase activity; metallodipeptidase activity; proteolysis; tissue regeneration

P21460

Cst3

cellular response to hydrogen peroxide, axon injury, hypoxia; response to nutrient levels; response to toxic substance

P13020

Gsn

actin filament polymerization; aging; cilium morphogenesis; regulation of cell adhesion; tissue regeneration

Q61646

Hp

antioxidant activity; defense response to bacterium; immune system process; response to hypoxia

O35664

Ifnar2

response to interferon-alpha; type I interferon receptor activity; type I interferon signaling pathway

P01592

Igj

adaptive immune response; antibacterial humoral response; innate immune response

Q9Z1M2

Irgm2

defense response to bacterium; defense response to protozoan; response to interferon-gamma

P00755

Klk1b1

bradykinin biosynthetic process; tissue kallikrein-kinin cascade; vasodilation

P26262

Klkb1

blood coagulation; fibrinolysis; inflammatory response; plasminogen activation;

Q61805

Lbp

defense response to Gram-negative/Gram positive bacterium; innate immune response; regulation of chemokine production

Q5SW46

Lpo

defense response to bacterium; peroxidase activity; response to oxidative stress

P08071

Ltf

antibacterial humoral response; antifungal humoral response; innate immune response in mucosa; positive regulation of toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathway; regulation of cytokine production; regulation of tumor necrosis factor production

P17897

Lyz1

cytolysis; defense response to Gram-negative/ Gram-positive bacterium; lysozyme activity

E9Q5I3

Muc5b

defense response to bacterium; regulation of macrophage activation

Q6LDU8

Ngf

inflammatory response; response to lipopolysaccharide; response to radiation; sensory perception of pain

O08692

Ngp

defense response

O88593

Pglyrp1

defense response to Gram-positive bacterium; innate immune response; negative regulation of inflammatory response; negative regulation of interferon-gamma production; negative regulation of natural killer cell differentiation

P02816

Pip

aspartic-type endopeptidase activity; regulation of immune system process

O09049

Reg3g

MyD88-dependent toll-like receptor signaling pathway; defense response to Gram-positive bacterium; positive regulation of wound healing

P31725

S100a9

chronic inflammatory response; innate immune response; leukocyte chemotaxis; neutrophil aggregation; response to lipopolysaccharide

P07758

Serpina1a

acute-phase response; response to cytokine; response to peptide hormone

Q80YQ1

Thbs1

cellular response to growth factor stimulus; cellular response to tumor necrosis factor; chronic inflammatory response; immune response; inflammatory response

Q9JHY3

Wfdc12

defense response to bacterium; extracellular region; serine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity

P63101

Ywhaz

histamine secretion by mast cell; response to drug

Submission of mouse salivary proteins to the UniProt gene ontology database identified 35 proteins with functions related to defense and/or wound healing.

Not surprisingly our list consists of several proteins whose functions are yet to be determined. One such protein is the 16.5 kDa submaxillary gland glycoprotein (or salivary protein 1, Spt1) which was first identified by us [25]. Another is Dccp2, which shares homology with members of the common salivary protein-1/Demilune cell and parotid protein (CSP-1/Dccp) family of proteins, suggested to potentially have either antimicrobial or enamel protective activities [26]. Fifty-five other proteins were identified in the mouse saliva that do not have gene ontology annotations in UniProt (Table 2).
Table 2

Mouse salivary proteins with no known gene annotations

UniProt

Description

D3YTP1

2310057J18Rik (RIKEN cDNA 2310057 J18, isoform CRA_a)

F7D4R8

5430401F13Rik (Fragment)

E9PWS6

A630073D07Rik

E9QLA8

A830010M20Rik

F6QRE9

BC007180 (Fragment)

Q3UQ05

Bpifb5

A2AJD1

Bpifb9b

E9PYC2

Dcpp2

L7N259

Dcpp3

E9Q0B5

Fcgbp

F6URP1

Gm6619 (Fragment)

A0A075B6A3

Igha

A0A075B5P2

Igkc

A2BHR0

Obp2b

E9PYQ4

Prol1

Q3TUY3

Sbpl (Spermine binding protein-like)

E9QA35

Spata31d1a

D3Z617

Sval2 (Seminal vesicle antigen-like 2, isoform CRA_a)

Q9DA65

16.5 kDa submandibular gland glycoprotein

Q8R1E9

Allergen dI chain C2A (Androgen binding protein beta) (Androgen-binding protein) (Protein Scgb2b27)

Q91WB5

Androgen binding protein alpha (Androgen-binding protein) (Protein Scgb1b27)

Q8JZX1

Androgen binding protein gamma (Protein Scgb2b26) (Salivary androgen-binding protein gamma subunit)

O35176

Androgen-binding protein (Androgen-binding protein eta) (Lacrimal androgen-binding protein eta) (Protein Scgb1b2)

D2XZ31

Androgen-binding protein (Protein Scgb1b29) (Protein Scgb1b7) (Fragment)

Q80XE3

BC051076 protein (Protein BC051076) (Fragment)

P07743

BPI fold-containing family A member 2 (Parotid secretory protein) (PSP)

Q8C1E1

BPI fold-containing family B member 2 (Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein-like 1)

A2BGH0

BPI fold-containing family B member 4 (Long palate, lung and nasal epithelium carcinoma-associated protein 4)

Q8BU51

BPI fold-containing family B member 6 (Bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein-like 3)

Q9D6P8

Calmodulin-like protein 3

Q99MQ5

Collagen alpha-1(XXV) chain (CLAC-P) [Cleaved into: Collagen-like Alzheimer amyloid plaque component (CLAC)]

Q03401

Cysteine-rich secretory protein 1 (CRISP-1) (Acidic epididymal glycoprotein 1) (Sperm-coating glycoprotein 1) (SCP 1)

Q03402

Cysteine-rich secretory protein 3 (CRISP-3) (Acidic epididymal glycoprotein 2) (Sperm-coating glycoprotein 2) (SCP 2)

P51655

Glypican-4 (K-glypican) [Cleaved into: Secreted glypican-4]

D3YVW2

Golgi integral membrane protein 4

Q8BM72

Heat shock 70 kDa protein 13 (Microsomal stress-70 protein ATPase core)

B1AQ77

Keratin 15, isoform CRA_a (Keratin, type I cytoskeletal 15)

Q3UV17

Keratin, type II cytoskeletal 2 oral (Keratin-76) (K76) (Type-II keratin Kb9)

Q66VB7

Lacrein (Protein Gm1553)

Q14AJ3

Lipocalin 3 (Vomeronasal secretory protein 1)

J3QM75

MCG1039283 (Protein Scgb2b19)

D3YYY1

MCG116526 (Protein Scgb2b7)

G5E8B4

MCG147827 (Secretoglobin family 2B member 2)

G5E8B5

MCG22579 (Secretoglobin family 1C member 1)

Q6GQX2

Nck-associated protein 5-like

Q02819

Nucleobindin-1 (CALNUC)

Q8BHE0

Proline-rich protein 11

Q91X93

Proline-rich protein BstNI subfamily 1 (Protein Prb1)

Q6PDI5

Proteasome-associated protein ECM29 homolog (Ecm29)

Q9CV82

Protein 2310003L06Rik (Fragment)

P97347

Repetin

Q920H1

Secretoglobin family 3A member 2 (Pneumo secretory protein 1) (PnSP-1) (Uteroglobin-related protein 1)

Q6JHY2

Submandibular gland protein C

Q61900

Submaxillary gland androgen-regulated protein 3A (Salivary protein MSG1) (Submaxillary gland androgen-regulated protein 1)

Q6ZPJ0

Testis-expressed sequence 2 protein

Q9CPT4

UPF0556 protein C19orf10 homolog (Interleukin-25) (IL-25) (Stromal cell-derived growth factor SF20)

Q5SXG7

Vitelline membrane outer layer protein 1 homolog

Fifty-seven of the 345 proteins identified in mouse saliva, were found to have no gene ontology attributes in the UniProt database.

Sex-linked proteins

The small number of mice representing each sex (2 pools; total 4 mice) prohibited statistical analyses and limited conclusions regarding sex-related proteins. Nevertheless, several proteins showed sex-linked quantitative differences. In the present study we identified 82 proteins unique to females and 89 unique to males (Figure 1). However, when a protein was identified in one sex but underrepresented in the other sex by less than 2 peptides, they were not considered as being gender specific. Additionally, proteins that were not represented in both pools from each sex were eliminated. Consequently, a number of proteins were further removed from the gender specific sub-group. Table 3 lists 10 proteins exclusively detected in male saliva and only 2 proteins exclusive to females. Most of these proteins were not highly abundant as indicated by their intensity scores which were not in the top 100 proteins (Additional files 1 and 2). An exception was Klk1b24, a member of the kallikrein-related peptidase family of proteins. Klk1b24 was ranked in the top 40 proteins found in male saliva (Additional file 1), but was not detected in female saliva. The kallikreins and kallikrein-related peptidases are a large family of serine proteases which play important roles in inflammation [27] and have recently been shown to be sex-linked [17]. However, we found that 11 of the 12 kallikrein-related peptidases that were reported as male-specific in the study by Karn et al. [17], were also present in female saliva (Additional file 3). Nonetheless, we detected that, based on the rank and number of unique peptides, 8 of these kallikrein-related peptidases displayed higher levels in males than females, whereas 3 did not show sex-linked quantitative differences in male and females. The levels of Klk1 and Klkb5 were similar in the saliva from both males and females (Additional file 4), in agreement with the observations of Karn et al. [17]. The identification of additional members of the kallikrein-related peptidase family of proteins in female saliva could simply be attributed to an increased depth of analysis, as substantially more proteins were identified in our study. Another plausible explanation could pertain to strain differences; the CD1 strain used in our study versus the C57BL/6 strain used in the Karn et al. study [17].
Table 3

Sex-linked proteins.

UniProt

Protein name

Gene symbol

Gene ontology (GO)

A) Salivary proteins unique to male mice

Q9D6P8

Calmodulin-like protein 3

Calml3

calcium ion binding

Q8BHN3

Neutral alpha-glucosidase AB

Ganab

Golgi apparatus; N-glycan processing; carbohydrate binding; endoplasmic reticulum; glucan 1,3-alpha-glucosidase activity; glucosidase II complex; glucosidase activity; melanosome; protein binding

Q91XA2

Golgi membrane protein 1

Golm1

Golgi apparatus; integral component of membrane; nucleus organization; regulation of lipid metabolic process

Q61754

Kallikrein 1-related peptidase b24

Klk1b24

proteolysis; serine-type endopeptidase activity

Q63836

Selenium-binding protein 2

Selenbp2

cytosol; membrane; nucleus; protein transport; selenium binding

P70277

Alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminide alpha-2,6-sialyltransferase 2

St6galnac2

integral component of Golgi membrane; protein glycosylation; sialyltransferase activity

B1AQJ2

Ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase 36

Usp36

cysteine-type peptidase activity; nucleolus; ubiquitin-dependent protein catabolic process

Q80YQ1

Thrombospondin 1

Thbs1

activation of MAPK activity; blood vessel morphogenesis; calcium ion binding; cell adhesion; cell cycle arrest; cell migration; cellular response to growth factor stimulus; cellular response to tumor necrosis factor; (abbreviated)

J3QM75

MCG1039283 (Protein Scgb2b19)

Scgb2b19

extracellular space

A2ANT6

Major urinary protein 6

Mup6

extracellular region; pheromone binding; small molecule binding; transporter activity

B) Salivary proteins unique to female mice

P29699

Alpha-2-HS-glycoprotein

Ahsg

acute-phase response; cysteine-type endopeptidase inhibitor activity; extracellular space; negative regulation of bone mineralization; ossification; positive regulation of phagocytosis; regulation of inflammatory response

Q5GAN1

Angiogenin ribonuclease 5

Ang5

endoribonuclease activity, producing 3'-phosphomonoesters; nucleic acid binding

Ten proteins found in mouse saliva were limited to males and 2 proteins were limited to females. Gene ontologies were derived from UniProt.

Comparison of the mouse and human salivary proteome

A catalogue of the human salivary proteome from healthy individuals was recently published by Denny et al. [13] identifying over 1100 proteins. This was preceded by a less extensive list published by Wilmarth et al., comprised of 102 proteins [14]. Defining orthologous relationships between two species presents a certain amount of difficulty as many proteins have evolved in different species to several forms and derivatives. For example, the five members of the cystatin family of proteins in the human saliva were represented in the mouse by two members, (gene symbols cst3 and cst10); and lipocalin 1 and lipocalin 2 by four family members in the mouse (gene symbols lcn3, 4, 11, and 14). However, the BioMart data mining tool in the Ensembl genome database (release 76, August 2014 [28]), provides a method of conversion with generally accepted results [29]. We submitted the list of 345 mouse salivary proteins to the BioMart data mining tool which identified 283 orthologous human genes and their corresponding Ensembl gene identification numbers (Additional file 5). Following this analysis, we then compared the mouse proteins with the human proteins identified by Denny et al. [13]. Since the 1166 human salivary proteins, reported by Denny et al. [13] were initially identified by International Protein Index (IPI), a database which has since been deactivated, the DAVID gene identification tool [30,31] was then used to convert the 1166 human protein list to 930 Ensembl gene identification numbers. Of the 283 orthologous genes identified by BioMart from our mouse salivary proteins, 131 were represented in the human salivary proteome (Additional file 5); 93 more than previously reported by Karn et al. [32]. A possible reason for protein differences between the present study and that of the human salivary proteome may be the method of collection (duct versus whole saliva). As well, dietary, hygiene, social and sexual behavior differences may also explain differences in the salivary proteome of the two species. For example, mice use saliva for their fur care, and also lick the fur of other group members for social purposes, or leave traces of saliva, presumably containing pheromone-like substances, to mark their territory. Humans have few remaining functions of saliva in a sociosexual context [33].

Conclusions

Saliva, as a non-invasive, efficient alternative for the diagnosis of systemic disease holds much promise. In-depth analysis of saliva is important to identify potential biomarkers of disease. Furthermore, such identification in the mouse can facilitate the development of mouse models to study specific biomarkers of many human diseases. The present study has provided the most in-depth analysis of the mouse salivary proteome to date, identifying 345 proteins. Mouse models are commonly used in the study of human diseases and it is well recognized that gender is an important variable that should be considered in many of these models [34-37]. In this study, a search for sex-linked proteins revealed several that were found in male saliva which were absent in females. Additionally, comparison of the mouse proteins with the recently published most extensive catalogue to date, of the human salivary proteome from healthy individuals [13], has allowed the identification of 131 proteins present in both human and mouse saliva. These studies therefore contribute further insight into the growing number of proteins that may be potentially useful biomarkers of health and disease.

Methods

Saliva collection

Mice were housed in the animal care facility at the University of Manitoba. All animal protocols were approved by the University of Manitoba Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the Canadian Council for Animal Care Guidelines. Saliva was collected at 7–8 weeks of age from 4 female and 4 male CD1 mice. Briefly, animals were anesthetized in a chamber infused with 4% isofluorane, and salivation was induced by subcutaneous administration of 10 mg/kg pilocarpine (Sigma-Aldrich Canada Co.Oakville, ON, Canada) in phosphate buffered saline. Saliva was collected with a pipet over a 15 min period and transferred to a microcentrifuge tube containing protease inhibitor (Complete Mini, Roche Diagnostics, Laval, PQ, Canada). The saliva was then vortexed for 1 min, centrifuged at 16000 g for 5 min at 4°C, transferred to a new tube, leaving behind any precipitated debris from the mouth, and then stored at −80°C. This protocol excludes intact microorganisms present in the collected saliva from subsequently being processed with the salivary proteins.

Sample preparation

The protein concentration of each saliva sample was determined using the Pierce BCA assay kit (Fisher Scientific). Saliva samples collected from two female mice were combined in equal protein amounts to form a pooled sample (Female P1), and similarly pooled from the two other female mice (Female P2). Likewise, saliva collected from 4 male mice was combined into 2 pools (Male P1 and Male P2). Proteomic analysis was then carried out at the Manitoba Centre for Proteomics and Systems Biology at the University of Manitoba.

Protein digestion and peptide purification

A modified version of the filter aided sample preparation protocol [38] was used. Proteins from each pellet pool were resuspended in 1 ml of lysis buffer (1% [wt/vol] sodium dodecyl sulfate, 100 mM Tris–HCl, 0.1 M dithiothreitol [pH 7.6]) and heated at 95°C for 5 min and subsequently centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 20 min. The resulting supernatant was transferred to an Amicon Ultra-15 10 K filter device (Millipore, Billerica, MA) and washed three times in 12 ml of urea solution (8 M urea in 0.1 M Tris–HCl [pH 8.5]). Each wash step included centrifugation at 4,000 × g for at least 10 min until the final volume remaining in the filter tube was <0.5 ml. 100 mM -iodoacetamide solution (in 8 M urea solution) was added to the filter device, and left at room temperature in the dark for 20 min. After centrifugation, the filter membrane was washed twice with an additional 12 ml of urea solution. A 50-μl aliquot was taken from the filter unit and analyzed by using a BCA protein assay kit (Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford, IL) to estimate the total protein content of the sample. The filter membrane was washed twice with 12 ml of 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate in water, and the remaining protein was trypsin digested for 18 h at room temperature (trypsin/protein ratio, 1 μg:100 μg). On the following day, the filter unit was transferred to a new collection tube and spun at 4,000 × g for 10 min, and the filtrate was retained for downstream analysis. The membrane was washed with 1 ml of 0.5 M NaCl, and the resulting filtrate was combined with the corresponding previous filtrate and stored at −80°C and dried in speed vac. Dried peptides were resuspended in 0.1% TFA and desalted by 100-mm C18 column (5-μm Luna C18) [39]; Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and eluted using 80% (vol/vol) acetonitrile. Purified aliquots were lyophilized and redissolved in buffer A (0.1% formic acid in water). Peptide concentrations in the combined filtrate were measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc, MA,USA) for subsequent mass spectrometry analysis.

Proteomic analysis by nano-RPLC-MS/MS

Saliva samples were analyzed by nano-RPLC-MS/MS using an A splitless Ultra 2D Plus [Eksigent, Dublin, CA] system coupled to a high speed Triple TOF™ 5600 mass spectrometer [AB SCIEX, Concord, Canada] as described previously [38-42] ~ 3ug peptides from each pool were injected via a PepMap100 trap column [0.3 × 5 mm, 5 μm, 100 Å, Dionex, Sunnyvale, CA], and a 100 μm × 150 mm analytical column packed with 5 μm Luna C18(2) was used prior to MS/MS analysis. Both eluents A (water) and B (99% acetonitrile) contained 0.1% formic acid as an ion-pairing modifier. The tryptic digest was analyzed with 180 minutes gradient. Eluent B had a gradient from 0% to 35% over 165 minutes, 35% to 85% in 1 minute and was kept at 85% for 5 minutes at a flow rate of 500 nL/min. Key parameter settings for the TripleTOF 5600 mass spectrometer were as follows: ionspray voltage floating (ISVF) 3000 V, curtain gas (CUR) 25, interface heater temperature (IHT) 150, ion source gas 1 (GS1) 25, declustering potential (DP) 80 V. All data was acquired using information-dependent acquisition (IDA) mode with Analyst TF 1.5 software [AB SCIEX, USA]. For IDA parameters, 0.25 s MS survey scan in the mass range of 400–1250 were followed by 20 MS/MS scans of 100 ms in the mass range of 100–1600 (total cycle time: 2.3 s). Switching criteria were set to ions greater than mass to charge ratio (m/z) 400 and smaller than m/z 1250 with a charge state of 2–5 and an abundance threshold of more than 150 counts. Former target ions were excluded for 5 seconds. A sweeping collision energy setting of 37 ± 15 eV was applied to all precursor ions for collision-induced dissociation.

Software analysis of protein identification and function

Spectra files were generated using Analyst® TF 1.6.2 Software and converted into mascot generic file format (.mgf) using AB SCIEX MS Data converter [AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA]. These files containing the MS/MS spectra information were submitted for protein identification by the X!Tandem GPM (http://www.thegpm.org). The following parameters were used: (i) enzyme, trypsin; (ii) one missed cleavage allowed; (iii) fixed modification, carbamidomethylation of cysteines (iv) variable modification, oxidation of methionine; (v) peptide tolerance, 20 ppm; and (vi) MS/MS tolerance, 20 ppm. LC-MS/MS data of were searched against the Mus musculus proteome. Any proteins identified as belonging to any species other than mouse were eliminated from our list.

Abbreviations

2D-LCMS: 

Two dimensional liquid chromatography\mass spectrometry

DTT: 

Dithiothreitol

IAA: 

Iodoacetamide

KO: 

Knockout

MS/MS: 

Tandem mass spectrometry

Pip: 

Prolactin inducible protein

TBS-T: 

Tris-buffered saline with 0.05% Tween 20

TFA: 

Trifluoroacetic acid

WT: 

Wild-type

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada and a grant from the Province of Manitoba, Department of Innovation, Energy and Mines.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba
(2)
Department of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba
(3)
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba
(4)
Department of Biochemistry and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba

References

  1. Ruhl S. The scientific exploration of saliva in the post-proteomic era: from database back to basic function. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2012;9(1):85–96.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Scannapieco FA. Saliva-bacterium interactions in oral microbial ecology. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1994;5(3–4):203–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wong DT. Salivaomics. J Am Dental Assoc. 2012;143(10 Suppl):19S–24.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Kawas S, Rahim ZH, Ferguson DB. Potential uses of human salivary protein and peptide analysis in the diagnosis of disease. Arch Oral Biol. 2012;57(1):1–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang L, Farrell JJ, Zhou H, Elashoff D, Akin D, Park NH, et al. Salivary transcriptomic biomarkers for detection of resectable pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(3):949–57. e941-947.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mager DL, Haffajee AD, Devlin PM, Norris CM, Posner MR, Goodson JM. The salivary microbiota as a diagnostic indicator of oral cancer: a descriptive, non-randomized study of cancer-free and oral squamous cell carcinoma subjects. J Transl Med. 2005;3:27.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Streckfus C, Bigler L, Dellinger T, Dai X, Kingman A, Thigpen JT. The presence of soluble c-erbB-2 in saliva and serum among women with breast carcinoma: a preliminary study. Clin Cancer Res. 2000;6(6):2363–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hu S, Arellano M, Boontheung P, Wang J, Zhou H, Jiang J, et al. Salivary proteomics for oral cancer biomarker discovery. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(19):6246–52.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Drobitch RK, Svensson CK. Therapeutic drug monitoring in saliva. An update. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1992;23(5):365–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jusko WJ, Milsap RL. Pharmacokinetic principles of drug distribution in saliva. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;694:36–47.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Lau CS, Wong DT. Breast cancer exosome-like microvesicles and salivary gland cells interplay alters salivary gland cell-derived exosome-like microvesicles in vitro. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33037.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Lau C, Kim Y, Chia D, Spielmann N, Eibl G, Elashoff D, et al. Role of pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes in salivary biomarker development. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(37):26888–97.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Denny P, Hagen FK, Hardt M, Liao L, Yan W, Arellanno M, et al. The proteomes of human parotid and submandibular/sublingual gland salivas collected as the ductal secretions. J Proteome Res. 2008;7(5):1994–2006.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilmarth PA, Riviere MA, Rustvold DL, Lauten JD, Madden TE, David LL. Two-dimensional liquid chromatography study of the human whole saliva proteome. J Proteome Res. 2004;3(5):1017–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamy E, da Costa G, Santos R, Capela ESF, Potes J, Pereira A, et al. Sheep and goat saliva proteome analysis: a useful tool for ingestive behavior research? Physiol Behav. 2009;98(4):393–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ang CS, Binos S, Knight MI, Moate PJ, Cocks BG, McDonagh MB. Global survey of the bovine salivary proteome: integrating multidimensional prefractionation, targeted, and glycocapture strategies. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(11):5059–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Karn RC, Laukaitis CM. Positive selection shaped the convergent evolution of independently expanded kallikrein subfamilies expressed in mouse and rat saliva proteomes. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20979.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lamy E, Graca G, da Costa G, Franco C, E Silva FC, Baptista ES, et al. Changes in mouse whole saliva soluble proteome induced by tannin-enriched diet. Proteome Sci. 2010;8:65.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. The Universal Protein (UniProt) Resource. [http://www.uniprot.org/].
  20. Ericson T, Pruitt K, Wedel H. The reaction of salivary substances with bacteria. J Oral Pathol. 1975;4(6):307–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Myal Y, Iwasiow B, Yarmill A, Harrison E, Paterson JA, Shiu RP. Tissue-specific androgen-inhibited gene expression of a submaxillary gland protein, a rodent homolog of the human prolactin-inducible protein/GCDFP-15 gene. Endocrinology. 1994;135(4):1605–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Myal Y, Robinson DB, Iwasiow B, Tsuyuki D, Wong P, Shiu RP. The prolactin-inducible protein (PIP/GCDFP-15) gene: cloning, structure and regulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1991;80(1–3):165–75.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nistor A, Bowden G, Blanchard A, Myal Y. Influence of mouse prolactin-inducible protein in saliva on the aggregation of oral bacteria. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24(6):510–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nistor A. Investigations into the role of mPIP, the mouse homologue of hPIP/GCDFP-15, in innate host defense. Master’s Thesis, University of Manitoba; 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/3031.Google Scholar
  25. Myal Y, Iwasiow B, Yarmill A, Shiu RP. A new member of the hormonally regulated rodent submaxillary gland glycoprotein gene family: cDNA cloning and tissue specific expression. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1996;120(2):133–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mullins JJ, Mullins LJ, Dunbar DR, Brammar WJ, Gross KW, Morley SD. Identification of a human ortholog of the mouse Dcpp gene locus, encoding a novel member of the CSP-1/Dcpp salivary protein family. Physiol Genomics. 2006;28(1):129–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sotiropoulou G, Pampalakis G. Kallikrein-related peptidases: bridges between immune functions and extracellular matrix degradation. Biol Chem. 2010;391(4):321–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Flicek P, Amode MR, Barrell D, Beal K, Billis K, Brent S, et al. Ensembl 2014. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Database issue):D749–55.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Guberman JM, Ai J, Arnaiz O, Baran J, Blake A, Baldock R, et al. BioMart Central Portal: an open database network for the biological community. Database (Oxford). 2011;2011:bar041.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. da Huang W, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37(1):1–13.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Karn RC, Chung AG, Laukaitis CM. Shared and unique proteins in human, mouse and rat saliva proteomes: Footprints of functional adaptation. Proteomes. 2013;1(3):275–89.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mandel ID. The functions of saliva. JDentRes. 1987; 66 Spec No:623–27.Google Scholar
  34. Bierhaus A, Nawroth PP. Critical evaluation of mouse models used to study pain and loss of pain perception in diabetic neuropathy. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2012;120(4):188–90.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Chang HY, Mitzner W. Sex differences in mouse models of asthma. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2007;85(12):1226–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kokras N, Dalla C. Sex differences in animal models of psychiatric disorders. Br J Pharmacol. 2014;171:4595–619.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilke M, Buijs-Offerman RM, Aarbiou J, Colledge WH, Sheppard DN, Touqui L, et al. Mouse models of cystic fibrosis: phenotypic analysis and research applications. J Cyst Fibros. 2011;10 Suppl 2:S152–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Wisniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):359–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Grigoryan M, Shamshurin D, Spicer V, Krokhin OV. Unifying expression scale for peptide hydrophobicity in proteomic reversed phase high-pressure liquid chromatography experiments. Anal Chem. 2013;85(22):10878–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lao YW, Mackenzie K, Vincent W, Krokhin OV. Characterization and complete separation of major cyclolinopeptides in flaxseed oil by reversed-phase chromatography. J Sep Sci. 2014;37(14):1788–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Rydzak T, McQueen PD, Krokhin OV, Spicer V, Ezzati P, Dwivedi RC, et al. Proteomic analysis of Clostridium thermocellum core metabolism: relative protein expression profiles and growth phase-dependent changes in protein expression. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:214.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Verbeke TJ, Spicer V, Krokhin OV, Zhang X, Schellenberg JJ, Fristensky B, et al. Thermoanaerobacter thermohydrosulfuricus WC1 shows protein complement stability during fermentation of key lignocellulose-derived substrates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80(5):1602–15.View ArticlePubMed CentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Blanchard et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement