Skip to main content
Download PDF

Analysis of plasma proteins using 2D gels and novel fluorescent probes: in search of blood based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease

Proteome Science volume 20, Article number: 2 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The Australian Imaging and Biomarker Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging is designed to aid the discovery of biomarkers. The current study aimed to discover differentially expressed plasma proteins that could yield a blood-based screening tool for Alzheimer’s disease.

Methods

The concentration of proteins in plasma covers a vast range of 12 orders of magnitude. Therefore, to search for medium to low abundant biomarkers and elucidate mechanisms of AD, we immuno-depleted the most abundant plasma proteins and pre-fractionated the remaining proteins by HPLC, prior to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The relative levels of approximately 3400 protein species resolved on the 2D gels were compared using in-gel differential analysis with spectrally resolved fluorescent protein detection dyes (Zdyes™). Here we report on analysis of pooled plasma samples from an initial screen of a sex-matched cohort of 72 probable AD patients and 72 healthy controls from the baseline time point of AIBL.

Results

We report significant changes in variants of apolipoprotein E, haptoglobin, α1 anti-trypsin, inter-α trypsin inhibitor, histidine-rich glycoprotein, and a protein of unknown identity. α1 anti-trypsin and α1 anti-chymotrypsin demonstrated plasma concentrations that were dependent on APOE ε4 allele dose. Our analysis also identified an association with the level of Vitamin D binding protein fragments and complement factor I with sex. We then conducted a preliminary validation study, on unique individual samples compared to the discovery cohort, using a targeted LC-MS/MS assay on a subset of discovered biomarkers. We found that targets that displayed a high degree of isoform specific changes in the 2D gels were not changed in the targeted MS assay which reports on the total level of the biomarker.

Conclusions

This demonstrates that further development of mass spectrometry assays is needed to capture the isoform complexity that exists in theses biological samples. However, this study indicates that a peripheral protein signature has potential to aid in the characterization of AD.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia, accounting for 60–80% of cases [1]. It is estimated that there are over 40 million people suffering from AD dementia, with the number expected to rise to over 100 million by the year 2050 [1]. More than 75% of those afflicted with dementia remain undiagnosed [2]. While a small portion of AD cases are familial, 95% of AD cases are late onset or “sporadic”, being of unknown and possibly heterogeneous etiology [3].

Currently, the diagnosis of AD is made by clinical assessments of cognitive impairment, with the exclusion of diagnosis for other dementias. With the addition of brain imaging techniques, the accuracy of diagnosis is approximately 90% [4]. The gold standard for the pre-mortem diagnosis of AD involves positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of amyloid load in the brain [5]. Due to the expense, low availability, and the technically challenging nature of PET imaging it is not suitable for population screening and there is a large research effort to develop peripheral screening tools that can be used to detect those at risk of developing AD. Investigations of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are proving to be effective for early detection of AD risk [6, 7]. However, the collection of CSF is not a widespread practice, as it requires an invasive lumbar puncture, as compared with much less-invasive blood tests. This situation has led to an intensive search for blood based biomarkers that may reflect changes in AD that are systemic, or due to either the disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) [8, 9] or the trafficking of proteins between the brain and blood [10]. While AD is conceptually a brain disease, there is evidence of altered protein expression in the periphery. This has been shown in several avenues of research, including AD related morphological, chemical and proteomic changes in red-blood cells [11,12,13,14], alterations of motility in white blood cells and changes in membrane fluidity in leukocytes [15,16,17], as well as reports of plasma biomarker panels [18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. Previous proteomics studies have detected significant changes in proteins found in plasma, serum and CSF in AD. However, none of these studies have yielded accurate, specific and reproducible diagnostic markers for AD [25,26,27,28]. This remains a significant challenge in the field, but there are indications that a blood–biomarker is possible as indicated by reports measuring the amyloid beta 40/42 ratio, tau [29,30,31,32,33], p-tau [34].

Global discovery investigations of CSF and plasma proteins face an imposing dynamic range of analyte concentrations, spanning approximately 10 orders of magnitude [35, 36], whereas the various platforms for proteomic analysis of intact proteins are limited to the most abundant 3–5 orders of magnitude. With the immense heterogeneity of the immunoglobulins, plasma comprises many tens of thousands of protein species, of which approximately 50% by weight is serum albumin [37] and 92% of the plasma protein is composed of 14 of the most abundant proteins [38]. We used immuno-depletion to remove the 14 most abundant proteins from plasma. We then employed reverse phase high-pressure liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) to provide further fractionation of less abundant species into simpler subsets of proteins. Proteins were subsequently measured with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2DGE). The advantage that 2DGE provides as a proteomic platform is its ability to detect changes in a very wide range of post translationally modified protein isoforms. We also employed a pooling strategy to incorporate a larger population in the study to reduce effects of individual variability and to emphasize changes that are related to disease [39, 40]. Using recently developed Zdyes [41, 42] for covalent labeling and differential in-gel comparison of AD and control plasma proteins, we conducted a proteomic screen of protein isoforms in samples obtained from the Australian imaging and biomarker lifestyle study of ageing (AIBL). We have confirmed several previously observed findings [23, 24] and report additional plasma protein signatures of AD that vary with APOE ε4 gene dose and sex. Finally, we attempt to validate the discovered targets in individuals using a mass spectrometry-based platform.

Methods and materials

Diagnosis of subjects

The Australian Imaging and Biomarker, Lifestyle (AIBL) study is a dual-site, longitudinal cohort study that integrates neuroimaging, biomarker, neuropsychometric and lifestyle [43]. The cohort was divided into two groups; cognitively healthy individuals (healthy controls, HC), and participants diagnosed with AD as defined by NINCDS-ADRDA criteria [44] and majority were confirmed by amyloid PET. APOE genotypes were determined as previously described using PCR (Hixson and Vernier 1990)[45]. AIBL participant recruitment, cohort design and clinical assessments were previously described [43] and included comprehensive cognitive exam and amyloid PET imaging. Due to constraints in sample throughput we pooled samples from each diagnostic category, the demographic and biometric compositions of these pooled groups of samples are shown in Table 1. The MMSE score for individuals described as controls was greater than 28 and for AD cases the MMSE was less than 24. We also used the pooling strategy to obtain a measure of the average change in disease. Further, we generated n = 6 pooled groups from Control and AD to estimate the variance and significance of discovered biomarkers. Pools for each group were generated from n = 12 individuals from each category e.g. 12 females with AD diagnosis were pooled together and in total we analysed three pools generated from 36 unique samples for AD females and similarly for AD males, and Control males and females. The demographics and biometric composition of the samples used for the validation of the markers discovered in the pooled samples are provided in Table 3. Ethical approval for this study was provided by The University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee.

Table 1 Demographic data for each group of pooled plasma (n = 12 individuals per pool, three groups per condition). The p-value was calculated with a two-tailed Student’s t-test between All AD and All controls only
Full size table

Plasma collection

Plasma was isolated from 15 mL of whole blood collected in two Sarstedt s-monovette ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) K3E (01.1605.008) 7.5 mL tubes with prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) (Sapphire Biosciences, 33.3 ng/mL) pre-added to the tube (stored at 4 °C prior to use). After whole blood was collected from overnight fasted participants by venipuncture it was inverted several times and incubated on a laboratory orbital shaker for approximately 15 min at room temperature prior to plasma preparation. The whole blood was then combined into 15 mL polypropylene tubes and spun at 200 x g at 20 °C for 10 min with no brake. Supernatant (platelet rich plasma) was carefully transferred to a fresh 15 mL tube, leaving a 5 mm margin at the interface to ensure the buffy coat was not disturbed. The platelet rich plasma was spun at 800 g at 20 °C for 15 min with the brake on. The platelet depleted plasma was then aliquoted into 1 mL Nunc cryobank polypropylene tubes (Thermo Scientific, USA) in 0.25 mL aliquots and transferred immediately to a rack on dry ice and transferred to liquid nitrogen vapor tanks (− 178 °C) until required for the assays approximately 4 years after collection.

Immuno-depletion and fractionation

The EDTA plasma from 12 individuals, selected to be pooled together based on sex and disease status (Fig. 1), were thawed on ice for 1 h. The plasma was centrifuged at 16,500 x g for 2 min and 50 μl from each individual was mixed together to generate the final pooled samples. Three independent pools of EDTA plasma were prepared from 12 subjects from each of male AD (mAD), female AD (fAD), male healthy control (mHC) and female healthy control (fHC) groups. Forty five microliters of the pooled plasma samples were immuno-depleted, using a multiple affinity removal system (MARS) 14 column according to manufacturers’ instructions (MARS-14, 4.6 × 100 mm, Agilent), as described in the supplementary material. Breifly, the flow-through contianing low abundance proteins were collected in 15 mL conical vials containing 0.82 g urea (SigmaUltra) and 23 μl glacial acetic acid (EMD Chemicals), for a final concentration of 6 M urea and 1% acetic acid. After complete mixing, the low abundant protein fractions were frozen and stored at − 80 °C until reverse-phase (RP) fractionation. The low abundant material was further fractionated into six sub-fractions, using a C18 column (Agilent high-recovery macro-porous 4.6 mm × 50 mm) operated at 80 °C (see supplemental material for details). Reverse phase fractions were lyophilized and then re-suspended for labelling, with two spectrally resolved fluorescent dyes (Zdye LLC, green emitting BDR-I-227 and blue emitting JAV-I-187) [41, 42]. Both fluorescently labelled samples were mixed and first resolved by isoelectric focusing (IEF) on 24 cm pH 3–11 Immobiline™ Drystrips (GE Healthcare) followed by electrophoresis on 11% SDS-PAGE gels in the second dimension (detailed methods are in the Supplemental materials). Gels were scanned for fluorescence, using a Typhoon™ Trio scanner (GE Healthcare), and false-color images were produced with ImageQuant software (GE Healthcare). Gel image files were imported into Progenesis SameSpots software (Nonlinear Dynamics) for processing, alignment and differential analysis of the relative amounts of protein species in AD and control pools, after normalizing spot volume intensities by the total spot volume intensity in each image. To control for any bias induced by the individual fluorescent dyes we reversed the fluorescent dye used on half of the samples within each clinical group.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Study design and experimental workflow. (1) Shows how the control and Alzheimer’s disease plasma was pooled into sex specific and disease specific groups. Each pooled group was generated from 12 individuals. (2) The pooled plasma was then depleted of the 14 most abundant proteins using the multiple affinity removal system (MARS14, Agilent Tech.). The low abundance proteins were further fractionated using reverse phase chromatography (3) to generate 6 fractions (4) for 2D differential gel electrophoresis of proteins labeled with Zdyes™ (4)

Full size image

Spot volumes were considered significantly changed if there was greater than a 1.3-fold change between groups and a p < 0.05 with a false discovery rate of 0.05, calculated as described in Storey et al. [46], when comparing the six pools (N = 12 per pool) of AD subjects with six pools of healthy controls (HC). Additionally, protein spot intensities were compared within male and female pools between AD and HC groups (three pools each for each sex). When comparing differences between the sexes, a cut-off of greater than 1.7-fold change in protein levels was applied. Spearman’s rank correlation and linear regression was used to assess the relationship between the number of APOE alleles and ApoE protein quantity.

Identification of proteins-of-interest

To identify changing protein variants, spots-of-interest were excised manually from analytical or preparative gels of fractionated proteins, for in-gel digestion with proteomics grade porcine trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, Castle Hill, Australia), following previously published methods for in-gel digestion [47]. Mass spectrometry data (obtained as described in the supplementary material) were used to search the Swiss-Prot Homo sapiens database, using MASCOT version 2.4.1 (Matrix Science). Fixed modification of carbamidomethylation of cysteine, and variable modifications including oxidation of methionine, deamidation of asparagine and glutamine, and a single missed cleavage were allowed for the protein searches, using 2+ and 3+ peptide charge states.

Selected reaction monitoring QQQ mass spectrometry

The individual samples used in the quantitative mass spectrometry assay were unique compared to the samples utilized for the discovery section. The demographic details for this cohort are described in Table 3. Heavy isotopically labelled peptides were obtained as part of the BAK76 protein target kit from MRM-Proteomics (BAK76-kit, Canada). Samples were processed using the manufacturer’s protocol (additional details in supplemental materials). Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry was conducted on with a 1290 UHPLC coupled to a 6495 QQQ mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies).

Statistical analyses were conducted using: Progenesis QI (Waters, UK) for the 2D gel data; GraphPad Prism v 8.0 for Mac OS X (GraphPad Software, USA) for the ROC; t-test analysis: One-way ANOVA with Sidak correction of multiple comparisons and Chi-squared test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Demographic details are listed in Table 1. The AD cohort was significantly older by 9.8 years (AD group 79.6 ± 3.1 years, HC group 69.8 ± 3.2 years, p = 0.0001) and the AD population was significantly enriched in the APOE ε4 allele (40%, AD; 13%, HC; p = 0.0001) as anticipated [48]. Body mass index (BMI) data were available for 54/72 AD subjects and 60/72 HC subjects. The available data showed a trend (p = 0.06) of somewhat lower BMI in AD pools (24.9 ± 1.4 kg/m2) than HC pools (26.5 ± 1.1 kg/m2). All of the controls had an amyloid PET scan confirming the lack of significant brain amyloid accumulation and approximately half of 56/72 of the AD cases had a corresponding PET, which confirmed the AD diagnosis. An extensive analysis of the PET data collected on this cohort can be found in Pike et al. [49].

Discovery 2D gel investigation of human plasma

The immuno-depletion and RP-HPLC fractionation strategy produced six fractions (F1–6) of proteins for comparison by 2DGE (Fig. 1). Representative analytical gel images of each of the six RP fractions are shown in Fig. 2. Approximately 3400 unique protein species were analyzed by this method after reducing the total spot count by 10%, to correct for proteins that were estimated to have eluted in more than one fraction. The inclusion of RP-HPLC fractionation resulted in a roughly linear six-fold increase in the number of protein spots measured. The increase was attributed to resolution of proteins that co-migrate on 2DGE, but have different hydrophobic characters and were separated by RP-HPLC. In addition, RP-HPLC enriches proteins, allowing lower abundance species to appear with stronger fluorescent signals on the 2D gels.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Representative 2D gel images of proteins from the six-reverse phase HPLC fractions (F1-F6). The proteins were labeled with Zdyes™ but are displayed here on grey scale as it provides a better display allowing the lower abundant proteins to be visible. The arrows indicate the protein spots with abundance changes in AD pools compared to HC, as discussed in the Results and Discussion sections and illustrated in Figs. 3 and 5

Full size image

Spots that met the inclusion criteria for significant differences in their fluorescent intensities (> 1.3 fold, adjusted p-value < 0.05), are indicated by the arrows in Fig. 2 and are listed in Table 2. Isoform variants, subunits or cleavage products of eight proteins that discriminated AD from control, according to the inclusion criteria, were identified: zinc α 2-glycoprotein (ZAG), histidine-rich glycoprotein (HRG) fragment, haptoglobin (Hpt), vitamin D binding protein (VDBP), complement factor I (CFI), inter-α trypsin inhibitor (ITHI), α-1 anti-trypsin (α1AT) and apolipoprotein E (ApoE). One significant spot in fraction #1 (F1) was unidentified. Features of proteins that showed significant abundance changes are as follows:

Table 2 Differentially expressed proteins discovered with 2D gel proteomics with a p-value < 0.05
Full size table

Zinc α 2-glycoprotein

Two putative glycoforms of zinc α 2-glycoprotein (ZAG, Fig. 2 fraction 1, arrows a and b) showed significant increase in abundance in the AD pools (1.9-fold, p < 0.05 and 1.5-fold, p < 0.05 respectively, Table 2). An adjacent isoform (Fig. 2 fraction 1, arrow c) also showed a trend towards being increased in AD pools although it did not quite meet statistical significance (1.3-fold, p = 0.06).

Haptoglobin

Haptoglobin (Hpt) is an abundant, acute phase response (APR) polymeric glycoprotein that is synthesized in the liver and is composed of varied combinations of four disulfide linked chains (two α1 chains of ~ 8.9 kDa that differ by a single amino-acid substitution, α2 chain ~ 16 kDa, and β chain ~ 45 kDa). Normal human populations commonly possess quaternary structural variations and heterogeneous stoichiometry of disulfide-linked Hpt chains [50], potentially yielding proteins composed of identical chains with differing pIs. In the current study the disulfide bridges were intact during isoelectric focusing then reduced before the SDS-PAGE dimension. This allowed the disulfide linked subunits of haptoglobin complexes to migrate at the same pI but resolve in the molecular weight dimension (Figs. 2 and 3). To avoid issues arising from mis-matching of heterogeneously focused spots in the comparison between pools, we quantified each of the Hpt spot-trains at 8.9 kDa, 16 kDa and 45 kDa (Fig. 2 fraction 2, arrows d, e, and f respectively) as the summed value of the respective constituent isoforms. Two haptoglobin (Hpt) chains (β chain ~ 45 kDa - Fig. 2 fraction 2, arrow d and α1 chain ~ 8.9 kDa - Fig. 2 fraction 2 reverse phase fraction, arrow e) were significantly higher in AD pools (2.0-fold, p < 0.01 and 2.4-fold, p < 0.02 respectively, Table 2). No significant difference was found in Hpt α2 chain (Fig. 2 fraction 2, arrow f). False-color image overlays of the fraction 2 gels, qualitatively representing changes in Hpt species, are shown in Fig. 3, where the ovals in the upper right image indicate the three different subunit spot trains.

Fig. 3
figure 3

False-color image overlays of two-color multiplex gels from reverse phase fraction 2 prior to spot-matching alignment. Three subunit chains of Hpt are outlined in ovals in the upper right image. The AD pools are represented by green in the upper three images and the controls were labeled red. In the lower images the labeling was reversed to control for potential bias induced by the dyes (AD labeled Green and controls labeled Red). Yellow spots represent approximately equal contribution of intensity from AD and control proteins

Full size image

Inter-α trypsin inhibitor

Two cleavage products of inter-α trypsin inhibitor (ITIH) heavy chain were significantly higher in AD pools. A 12–15 kDa C-terminal cleavage product (Fig. 2 fraction 3, arrow g) and an approximately 40 kDa N-terminal cleavage product (Fig. 2 fraction 4, arrow h) were both increased 1.3 fold in AD pools (p < 0.05 and p < 0.02 respectively, Table 2).

Apolipoprotein E

The most chemically basic protein spot of the apolipoprotein E (apoE) spot train (Fig. 2 fraction 5, arrow i) was significantly higher in the AD pools (1.5 fold, p < 0.02, Table 2). The 34 kDa ApoE spot train results from the superposition of the protein products of the APOE ε2, ε3 and ε4 alleles carried by the individuals contributing to the pools. Each of the alleles produces three clearly visible protein spot clusters. The clusters are likely due to heterogeneous deamidations and glycosylations [51]. The substitution of an arginine for a cysteine in apoE ε4 (C112R), results in a basic rightward shift of its isoelectric point (pI) toward the cathode relative to the apoE ε3 position. Additionally, plasma proteins are subject to non-enzymatic deamidation in vivo, a process that adds negative charges [52], creating features of the horizontal spot trains by shifting protein species toward the anode, leftward on gels. The partially overlapping superposition of apoE ε3 with ε4 variants appeared as four clusters of spots in most of the pooled samples, with the most chemically basic cluster comprising only apoE ε4 variants. Therefore, the most basic cluster of apoE spots provides a protein isoform proxy for the relative amounts of APOE ε4 allele within the pools. Figure 4A shows strong Pearson correlation (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.0001) of the normalized spot intensity of the most basic apoE “ε4 proxy” variant, with the averaged gene dosage of the APOE ε4 allele in the pools of this study.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A Regression analysis of the basic fraction 5 ApoE variant (ε4 proxy) with the fractional APOE ε4 gene dosage of the 12 pools: R2 = 0.83, p < 0.0001. Pool symbols are male healthy controls -╳, female healthy controls -▵, male AD -□, female AD -◇. B Regression analysis of total cohort, non-binding α1-antitrypsin (α1AT) variant vs. apoE ε4 proxy: R2 = 0.82, p < 0.0001; Pools are n = 12. Group symbols are: AD - ⊕, HC - +. C Fraction 5 multiplex gels that have not been aligned for spot-matching. Arrows indicate the correlated changes between the ε4 proxy spot (lower end) and the AD significant α1AT variant (upper end). The AD pools are represented by red in the upper three images and by green in the lower images, reflecting the dye reversal, used between these gels. Yellow represents approximately equal contribution of intensity from AD and control proteins. D. Detail from a pair of multiplexed gel images representative of low ApoE ε4 containing pools (panel i) and high ApoE ε4 containing pools (panel ii). The level of α1ACT isoforms correlated with the 34 kDa ApoE ε4 proxy spot that is shown in lower right-hand corners of the panel i and ii images. Regression analysis Pearson correlations: a- p = 0.012, R2 = 0.45; b- p = 0.002, R2 = 0.61; c- p = 0.003, R2 = 0.56; d- p = 0.002, R2 = 0.61; e- p = 0.007, R2 = 0.51; f- p = 0.003, R2 = 0.58. None of the α1ACT spots significantly discriminated the AD group from the HC group. The α1AT spot that significantly discriminated AD from HC pools (3.3 fold, p < 0.02,) is shown in panel ii

Full size image

Fraction 6 gels exhibited a series (Fig. 2 fraction 6, arrow j) comprising six to seven variants of the same apparent molecular weight (~ 35 kDa) as the fraction 5 apoE series. However, none of the fraction 6 apoE variants significantly correlated with APOE genotype.

α-1 anti-trypsin

A circulating species of α-1 anti-trypsin (α1AT) that was not bound by the immuno-depletion column (Fig. 2 fraction 5, arrow k) was significantly higher in AD pools (3.3 fold, p < 0.02, Table 2). The α1AT variant also closely correlated in regression analysis with the ε4 proxy spot volumes (Fig. 4B, R2 = 0.83, P < 0.0001). The α1AT variant that correlated with the ε4 proxy spot is shown in Fig. 4D, where the i panel has low ε4 proxy and the ii panel has high ε4 proxy. The relationship of these spots is qualitatively represented in the false-color image overlay in Fig. 4C, indicated by white arrows. An unidentified protein spot (Fig. 2 fraction 1, arrow l) was significantly lower (1.5-fold, p < 0.05, Table 2) in AD pools.

Sex specific differences

Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) cleavage product isoforms, (Fig. 1 fraction 3, arrows n, o, x and Fig. 5, demonstrated asymmetric sex-dependent AD associations. In female AD pools, several cleavage products of VDBP were in significantly higher concentrations relative to female control pools (p < 0.05). In male AD pools, many of the same VDBP cleavage products had significantly lower concentrations, relative to male control pools (p < 0.05, Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Intact and cleaved VDBP with sex specific changes shown in tables on the right. A Intact (top spot train) and cleaved VDBP (spots A, B, C). This spot train corresponds to n in Fig. 2 fraction 3. The intact VDBP spots were saturated in fluorescence signal intensity and masked from the Progenesis analysis. B Cleaved VDBP (A - M). This cluster of cleavages corresponds to o in Fig. 2 fraction 3. C Cleaved VDBP (A - E). This cluster of cleavages corresponds to x in Fig. 2 fraction 3. Significant changes (p < 0.05) are shown in bold

Full size image

Isoforms of complement factor I (Fig. 2 fraction 3 arrows p, q, r, s) also showed significant asymmetrical sex-specific dysregulation in AD (Table 2).

Targeted validation of 2D gel biomarkers

The discovery experiment conducted with 2D gels had several limitations, including the use of pooled plasma, which limits the ability to determine the potential for these markers to provide meaningful discriminatory signals in individuals. To validate the differentially expressed proteins in individual samples, we used a multiplexed quantitative LC-MS/MS assay developed by MRM proteomics (BAK76, Canada). Plasma (Li heparin) samples were obtained from AIBL (Demographics Table 3) and included an even number of males and females and cognitively normal controls (n = 44) and probable AD (n = 44). We could not confirm the elevation of any of the eight proteins we discovered using the pooled samples (Fig. 6). However, we did discover that complement C3, beta-2-microglobulin and peroxiredoxin-2, proteins, previously reported to be changed in the literature [28, 54,55,56], were elevated in AD plasma (Fig. 6). We did not replicate any of the associations we observed with sex or genotype in the discovery experiment (p > 0.05, one-way ANOVA). However, this likely to be due to the inability to distinguish the several proteoforms that were observed by 2D gels with an assay that measures total abundance of all the proteoforms of a protein. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis for complement C3, beta-2-microglobulin and peroxiredoxin 2 indicate that they only have weak discriminatory (accuracy ranged between 60 and 65%) ability to distinguish between cognitively normal from AD (Table 4).

Table 3 Demographic data for plasma samples used for targeted mass spectrometry biomarker validation
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure 6

Measurement of plasma biomarkers in control (n = 44, black diamonds) and Alzheimer’s disease (n = 44, grey circles) plasma. Biomarker candidates discovered using 2D gels were targeted and measured using LC-MS/MS and heavy labeled ([13C6,15N2 -lysine] or [13C6,15N4-arginine) peptides as internal standards. P-values were calculated using a one-way ANOVA and Sidak correction for multiple comparisons [53]

Full size image
Table 4 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of proteins measured by targeted LC-MS assay showing ability to distinguish controls (n = 44) from Alzheimer’s case (n = 44)
Full size table

Discussion

The effect of the APOE genotype on protein expression is an important consideration for the refinement of discovery and validation of future biomarkers in plasma [57]. Consistent with this we found significant correlation of increasing α1-antitrypsin (α1AT) with APOE ε4 genotype in plasma. We also found increased levels of cleavage products of VDBP in females with AD and a decrease in the cleavage products in males with AD (Fig. 5). Due to the enrichment of APOE ε4 genotype in AD cohorts, studies that compare controls vs AD are also confounding populations of 20% APOE ε4 positive versus an AD population with 40–80% APOE ε4 positive. To the best of our knowledge the current study is the first plasma proteomics study indicating that α1AT or α1 anti-chymotrypsin (α1ACT) have correlations with the APOE.

α-1 Anti-trypsin (α1AT) is an abundant, circulating, acute phase response (APR) serine protease inhibitor (serpin) that was targeted for removal from the analyte proteins by immuno-depletion (Fig. 1 MARS14). The close correlation of α1AT with the ε4 proxy variant, shown in Fig. 4B, suggests that α1AT may be a marker of the mode by which APOE ε4 contributes to the etiology of AD. It is of interest that α1AT, which is a serpin with known associations to AD in blood [58,59,60], CSF [61, 62] and senile plaques [63] also correlated with the APOE ε4 allele (Fig. 4B), however the specific physiological role of α1AT in tissues is not well elucidated. The Alzgene website shows a single positive genetic association of AD with an α1AT allele, from a small, unconfirmed 1996 study [64]. Analysis of total α1AT in neat undepleted plasma from individuals did not display any significant changes (Fig. 6).

The APR serpin, α1ACT, did not significantly discriminate AD from control pools, however, regression analysis of α1ACT variants significantly correlated with the ε4 proxy spot volumes (Fig. 4D). α1ACT has been reported to have genetic associations with AD [65, 66] and has been found in elevated concentration in plasma [67, 68] and CSF [69] in AD. α1ACT is more highly expressed in the brains of AD patients and is a component of senile plaques [70], as is ApoE [71]. Previous studies have suggested relationships between plasma concentrations of α1ACT and APOE genotype, but the results have been inconsistent. A radial immunodiffusion study found no correlation of APOE genotype with levels of α1ACT in plasma or serum [72]. An enzyme linked immuno-sorption assay study, showed α1ACT to have positive predictive value for the rate of cognitive decline in ε4 carriers, and no age-dependence, in AD patients [73]. A nephelometric assay study showed higher concentrations of plasma α1ACT in AD patients who were non-APOE ε4 carriers [74]. We have shown that cerebral spinal fluid levels of both α1ACT and α1AT are elevated in AD [75]. Functionally, α1ACT was shown to induce hippocampus and cerebral cortex plaque formation in mouse models of AD [76], as well as the phosphorylation of tau in the neurons of transgenic mice [77]. Both α1ACT and α1AT bind Aβ and suppress it’s fibrillization, which is a necessary process for the formation of senile plaques in vivo [78]. Thus, their role in AD may be more important at the functional level then as a marker of disease.

The elevated Hpt that we observed along with other circulating APR proteins may be a peripheral response to activated endothelia of the brain vessels. Various means by which cross-talk between central and peripheral inflammation may occur have been summarized [79]. The possibility that Hpt flow-through from the immuno-depletion column enriched a sub-population of non-binding conformers may be supported by the selective enrichment of 45 kDa and 8.9 kDa chains in the significantly changed species of AD pools, without a significant change of the 16 kDa chain. The question of whether Hpt was significantly higher in the flow-through because it exceeded the binding capacity of the column, or because of steric hindrance was beyond the scope of this study. In agreement with our observations, a previous report using a MARS column also observed an increase in Hpt in both AD and type 2 diabetes plasma [80] indicating that an Hpt increase is likely due to a general increase in inflammation. When measured in individuals there was no significant increase (Fig. 6, p = 0.19) in Hpt but this may be due to the inability of the LC-MS/MS method used to discriminate between the 45, 16 and 8.9 kDa chains. However, in cerebral spinal fluid we have shown that total levels of Hpt increase in AD using the same quantitative mass spectrometry technique [75]. Our observation of no change in Hpt in plasma but changes in CSF are consistent with previous reports [81].

Systemic inflammation is commonly measured clinically by assay of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) [82]. Circulating CRP is primarily synthesized in the liver and, like Hpt, CRP synthesis is mediated by the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 [83]. CRP is elevated in AD brain [84], but is not consistently higher in AD plasma. In the current study, CRP was detected in the 2DGE but when measured in the validation cohort by LC-MS the CRP levels were sporadic and no significant elevation was observed in AD (Fig. 6). The highly variable nature of the CRP levels is consistent with its role in acute phase inflammation response that changes with a large range of pathologies and not specific for AD.

Zinc α 2-glycoprotein (ZAG) is a 41 kDa glycoprotein adipokine believed to function as a lipid mobilizing factor [85]. In a study with a relatively wide range of body mass indices (BMI), serum ZAG discriminated groups with a negative correlation between BMI and ZAG concentrations [86]. ZAG has been found significantly lower in ventricular CSF of AD patients, discriminating AD from normal controls and non-AD dementias [87]. Lower BMI has been associated with risk of AD [88]. In the current study, BMI data were available for 54/72 AD subjects and 60/72 control subjects and was significantly higher in the AD pools (Table 1), consistent with elevated ZAG variants observed. The validation study on individual samples showed a trend (p = 0.06) towards elevated levels of ZAG in plasma from AD cases (Fig. 6).

In addition to disease classification, participants were evenly pooled according to sex. A consensus has yet to be reached as to the prevalence of sex-specific differences in AD [89, 90] and there is limited proteomic data on plasma investigating sex specific differences between AD and controls. To look for sex-specific dysregulation of proteins, we made intra-sex comparisons between AD and HC pools and found Vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) and Complement factor I (CFI) to be differentially regulated according to sex. VDBP is an abundant, monomeric 52–59 kDa glycoprotein that functions as the primary plasma transporter of the sterol vitamin D and its metabolites [91]. In addition to its role as vitamin D transporter, VDBP scavenges and sequesters actin monomers in the blood after cellular damage. It does so in concert with gelsolin [92], protecting micro-vasculature from the detrimental effects of ectopic actin fibrillization. VDBP is a regulator of macrophages and osteoclasts, and as an important chemotactic factor for leukocytes [93], independent of its vitamin D binding function. VDBP synthesis is estrogen dependent [94] and its blood concentration is significantly lower in males than females [95, 96]. The gel image of fraction 3 shows three abundant spot-trains of cleaved VDBP species (Fig. 1 fraction 3, arrows n, o, x), below the intact VDBP spot-train (Fig. 1 fraction 3, arrow m). The three spot-train clusters of cleaved peptides focused as disulfide bound complexes in the IEF step, to similar pIs as the uncleaved variants, as they were cross-linked by intra-chain disulfide bridges. After isoelectric focusing, chemical reduction released cleaved peptides to migrate to their respective lower apparent molecular weights. The proteoform difference observed with 2D-gels was not recapitulated with the LC-MS/MS assay that measured the total pool of VDBP (Fig. 6).

CFI is a complement activation inhibitor that has been shown to undergo disrupted function in vitro in the presence of Aβ [97]. CFI plasma concentration is modestly decreased in AD and correlated with brain volume [28], but we found no reports of gender specificity. Further, when measured in individuals we did not see any gender differences.

Conclusion

The etiology of AD, as for many diseases, is complex and polygenic. Pooled proteomics studies are designed to detect sporadically changing disease-related isoforms that change consistently enough in afflicted subjects to effect consistent “average” changes within pools, and as such constitutes a limitation of the current study. Our future studies aim to validate and understand the relationships between VDBP, CFI, α1ACT, and α1AT with sex and genotype, respectively. Here we measured the biomarkers discovered with 2DGE using a quantitative LC-MS/MS assay and the changes we observed by 2DGE were not validated with this approach. However, we did measure samples by quantitative LC-MS/MS that were independent of the discovery study and differences between AD and control values of several of the markers approached statistical significance (e.g. VDBP; Fig. 6). Overall, the measurement of total protein by LC-MS rather than proteoform-specific changes measured via 2DGE offers a potential explanation for the failure to validate the 2DGE discoveries. However, the replication of elevation of beta-2-microglobulin, complement C3 and peroxiredoxin 2 validate previous reports of these changes in AD and of the LC-MS/MS based assay to report global protein level changes [28, 54,55,56]. The correlation α1AT or α1ACT with the APOE genotype indicates that the point mutation differences between APOE ε2/3/4 may have wider impact than on the function of just the ApoE protein as a recent proteomic study in AD brain tissue has demonstrated [57]. Further, the failure to validate many of the proteoform changes highlights the inability of assays that measure the total abundance of a protein target (e.g. ELISA, LC-MS/MS) to reflect the complexity of the proteome. Overall, complement C3, beta-2-microglobulin and peroxiredoxin-2 may add value to the emerging plasma amyloid beta and tau/phosphor-tau assays for the early diagnosis of AD.

Availability of data and materials

The proteomics data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Abbreviations

α1AT:

α1-Anti-trypsin

α1ACT:

α1 Anti-chymotrypsin

APR:

Acute-phase reactant

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

Aβ:

Amyloid β peptide

ApoE:

Apolipoprotein E protein

BBB:

Blood-brain barrier

BMI:

Body mass index

CRP:

C-reactive protein

CNS:

Central Nervous System

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

Hpt:

Haptoglobin

HC:

Healthy control

HRG:

Histidine-rich glycoprotein

ITIH:

Inter-α trypsin inhibitor

Isoelectric point pI:

Isoelectric focusing IEF

KPI:

Kunitz-type protease inhibitor

RP-HPLC:

Reverse phase high pressure liquid chromatography

VDBP:

Vitamin D binding protein

ZAG:

Zinc α 2-glycoprotein

References

  1. Alzheimer’s, A. 2014 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:e47–92.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnett JH, Lewis L, Blackwell AD, Taylor M. Early intervention in Alzheime’s disease: a health economic study of the effects of diagnostic timing. BMC Neurol. 2014;14:101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Breteler MM. Early life circumstances and late life Alzheimer’s disease. Epidemiology. 2001;12:378–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jellinger KA, Janetzky B, Attems J, Kienzl E. Biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: ‘ALZheimer ASsociated gene’--a new blood biomarker? J Cell Mol Med. 2008;12:1094–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Villemagne VL, Burnham S, Bourgeat P, Brown B, Ellis KA, Salvado O, et al. Amyloid beta deposition, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:357–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blennow K, Dubois B, Fagan AM, Lewczuk P, de Leon MJ, Hampel H. Clinical utility of cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in the diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:58–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Holtzman DM. CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease: current utility and potential future use. Neurobiol Aging. 2011;32(Suppl 1):S4–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Starr JM, Farrall AJ, Armitage P, McGurn B, Wardlaw J. Blood-brain barrier permeability in Alzheimer’s disease: a case-control MRI study. Psychiatry Res. 2009;171:232–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zipser BD, Johanson CE, Gonzalez L, Berzin TM, Tavares R, Hulette CM, et al. Microvascular injury and blood-brain barrier leakage in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2007;28:977–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Banks WA. Brain meets body: the blood-brain barrier as an endocrine interface. Endocrinology. 2012;153:4111–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartai Z, Juhász A, Rimanóczy Á, Janáky T, Donkó T, Dux L, et al. Decreased serum and red blood cell kynurenic acid levels in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2007;50:308–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mohanty JG, Shukla HD, Williamson JD, Launer LJ, Saxena S, Rifkind JM. Alterations in the red blood cell membrane proteome in Alzheimer’s subjects reflect disease-related changes and provide insight into altered cell morphology. Proteome Sci. 2010;8:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Faux NG, Rembach A, Wiley J, Ellis KA, Ames D, Fowler CJ, et al. An anemia of Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:1227–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ryan TM, Roberts BR, McColl G, Hare DJ, Doble PA, Li QX, et al. Stabilization of nontoxic Abeta-oligomers: insights into the mechanism of action of hydroxyquinolines in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2015;35:2871–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fu T-K, Matsuyama SS, Kessler JO, Jarvik LF. Philothermal response, microtubules and dementia. Neurobiol Aging. 1986;7:41–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jarvik LF, Matsuyama SS, Kessler JO, Fu TK, Tsau S, Clark EO. Philothermal response of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurobiol Aging. 1982;3:93–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Scott RB, Collins JM, Hunt PA. Alzheimer’s disease and Down syndrome: leukocyte membrane fluidity alterations. Mech Ageing Dev. 1994;75:1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burnham SC, Faux NG, Wilson W, Laws SM, Ames D, Bedo J, et al. A blood-based predictor for neocortical Abeta burden in Alzheimer’s disease: results from the AIBL study. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:519–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Doecke JD, Laws SM, Faux NG, Wilson W, Burnham SC, Lam CP, et al. Blood-based protein biomarkers for diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2012;69:1318–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Guo LH, Alexopoulos P, Wagenpfeil S, Kurz A, Perneczky R, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I. Plasma proteomics for the identification of Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013;27:337–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hye A, Lynham S, Thambisetty M, Causevic M, Campbell J, Byers HL, et al. Proteome-based plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2006;129(11):3042–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Llano DA, Devanarayan V, Simon AJ, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging, I. Evaluation of plasma proteomic data for Alzheimer disease state classification and for the prediction of progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2013;27:233–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Song F, Poljak A, Kochan NA, Raftery M, Brodaty H, Smythe GA, Sachdev PS. Plasma protein profiling of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics. Proteome Sci. 2014;12(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-12-5.

  24. Muenchhoff J, Poljak A, Song F, Raftery M, Brodaty H, Duncan M, et al. Plasma protein profiling of mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease across two independent cohorts. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43:1355–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lonneborg A. Biomarkers for Alzheimer disease in cerebrospinal fluid, urine, and blood. Mol Diagn Ther. 2008;12:307–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Snyder HM, Corriveau RA, Craft S, Faber JE, Greenberg SM, Knopman D, Lamb BT, Montine TJ, Nedergaard M, Schaffer CB, Schneider JA, Wellington C, Wilcock DM, Zipfel GJ, Zlokovic B, Bain LJ, Bosetti F, Galis ZS, Koroshetz W, Carrillo MC. Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia including Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(6):710-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.10.008. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

  27. Teunissen CE, de Vente J, Steinbusch HW, De Bruijn C. Biochemical markers related to Alzheimer’s dementia in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Neurobiol Aging. 2002;23:485–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Thambisetty M, Simmons A, Hye A, Campbell J, Westman E, Zhang Y, et al. Plasma biomarkers of brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen Z, Mengel D, Keshavan A, Rissman RA, Billinton A, Perkinton M, et al. Learnings about the complexity of extracellular tau aid development of a blood-based screen for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15:487–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lue LF, Sabbagh MN, Chiu MJ, Jing N, Snyder NL, Schmitz C, et al. Plasma levels of Abeta42 and tau identified probable Alzheimer’s dementia: findings in two cohorts. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Nakamura A, Kaneko N, Villemagne VL, Kato T, Doecke J, Dore V, et al. High performance plasma amyloid-beta biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2018;554:249–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Risacher SL, Fandos N, Romero J, Sherriff I, Pesini P, Saykin AJ, et al. Plasma amyloid beta levels are associated with cerebral amyloid and tau deposition. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2019;11:510–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Schindler SE, Bollinger JG, Ovod V, Mawuenyega KG, Li Y, Gordon BA, et al. High-precision plasma beta-amyloid 42/40 predicts current and future brain amyloidosis. Neurology. 2019;93:e1647–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Palmqvist S, Janelidze S, Quiroz YT, Zetterberg H, Lopera F, Stomrud E, et al. Discriminative accuracy of plasma Phospho-tau217 for Alzheimer disease vs other neurodegenerative disorders. JAMA. 2020;324:772–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abdi F, Quinn JF, Jankovic J, McIntosh M, Leverenz JB, Peskind E, et al. Detection of biomarkers with a multiplex quantitative proteomic platform in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with neurodegenerative disorders. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9:293–348.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:845–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacobs JM, Adkins JN, Qian WJ, Liu T, Shen Y, Camp DG 2nd, et al. Utilizing human blood plasma for proteomic biomarker discovery. J Proteome Res. 2005;4:1073–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zolotarjova N, Mrozinski P, Chen H, Martosella J. Combination of affinity depletion of abundant proteins and reversed-phase fractionation in proteomic analysis of human plasma/serum. J Chromatogr A. 2008;1189:332–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Diz AP, Truebano M, Skibinski DO. The consequences of sample pooling in proteomics: an empirical study. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:2967–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Oberg AL, Vitek O. Statistical design of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:2144–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dratz EA, Grieco PA. (2010) Novel zwitterionic dyes for labeling in proteomic and other biological analyses. US20200036133A1 U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. https://uspto.report/patent/app/20040248203.

  42. Epstein MG, Reeves BD, Maaty WS, Fouchard D, Dratz EA, Bothner B, et al. Enhanced sensitivity employing zwitterionic and pI balancing dyes (Z-CyDyes) optimized for 2D-gel electrophoresis based on side chain modifications of CyDye fluorophores. New tools for use in proteomics and diagnostics. Bioconjug Chem. 2013;24:1552–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ellis KA, Bush AI, Darby D, De Fazio D, Foster J, Hudson P, et al. The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21:672–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hixson JE, Vernier DT. Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with HhaI. J Lipid Res. 1990;31(3):545-8.

  46. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:9440–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M. In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc. 2006;1:2856–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Heffernan AL, Chidgey C, Peng P, Masters CL, Roberts BR. The neurobiology and age-related prevalence of the epsilon4 allele of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer’s disease cohorts. J Mol Neurosci. 2016;60:316–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Pike KE, Savage G, Villemagne VL, Ng S, Moss SA, Maruff P, et al. Beta-amyloid imaging and memory in non-demented individuals: evidence for preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2007;130:2837–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Langlois MR, Delanghe JR. Biological and clinical significance of haptoglobin polymorphism in humans. Clin Chem. 1996;42:1589–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wernette-Hammond ME, Lauer SJ, Corsini A, Walker D, Taylor JM, Rall SC Jr. Glycosylation of human apolipoprotein E. The carbohydrate attachment site is threonine 194. J Biol Chem. 1989;264:9094–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sarioglu H, Lottspeich F, Walk T, Jung G, Eckerskorn C. Deamidation as a widespread phenomenon in two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of human blood plasma proteins. Electrophoresis. 2000;21:2209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Abdi H. The Bonferonni and Šidák corrections for multiple comparisons. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Davidsson P, Westman-Brinkmalm A, Nilsson CL, Lindbjer M, Paulson L, Andreasen N, et al. Proteome analysis of cerebrospinal fluid proteins in Alzheimer patients. Neuroreport. 2002;13:611–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Dominici R, Finazzi D, Polito L, Oldoni E, Bugari G, Montanelli A, et al. Comparison of beta2-microglobulin serum level between Alzheimer’s patients, cognitive healthy and mild cognitive impaired individuals. Biomarkers. 2018;23:603–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Yoshida Y, Yoshikawa A, Kinumi T, Ogawa Y, Saito Y, Ohara K, et al. Hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid and oxidatively modified peroxiredoxins in the blood of Alzheimer’s disease patients and their potential as biomarkers. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30:174–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Dai J, Johnson ECB, Dammer EB, Duong DM, Gearing M, Lah JJ, et al. Effects of APOE genotype on brain proteomic network and cell type changes in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11:454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Choi J, Malakowsky CA, Talent JM, Conrad CC, Gracy RW. Identification of oxidized plasma proteins in Alzheimer’s disease. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;293:1566–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Liao PC, Yu L, Kuo CC, Lin C, Kuo YM. Proteomics analysis of plasma for potential biomarkers in the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007;1:506–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yu HL, Chertkow HM, Bergman H, Schipper HM. Aberrant profiles of native and oxidized glycoproteins in Alzheimer plasma. Proteomics. 2003;3:2240–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Finehout EJ, Franck Z, Choe LH, Relkin N, Lee KH. Cerebrospinal fluid proteomic biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2007;61:120–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Puchades M, Hansson SF, Nilsson CL, Andreasen N, Blennow K, Davidsson P. Proteomic studies of potential cerebrospinal fluid protein markers for Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2003;118:140–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gollin PA, Kalaria RN, Eikelenboom P, Rozemuller A, Perry G. Alpha 1-antitrypsin and alpha 1-antichymotrypsin are in the lesions of Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroreport. 1992;3:201–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Kowalska A, Danker-Hopfe H, Wender M, Florczak J, Walter H. Association between the PI* M3 allele of α1-antitrypsin and Alzheimer’s disease? A preliminary report. Hum Genet. 1996;98:744–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Licastro F, Pedrini S, Ferri C, Casadei V, Govoni M, Pession A, et al. Gene polymorphism affecting alpha1-antichymotrypsin and interleukin-1 plasma levels increases Alzheimer’s disease risk. Ann Neurol. 2000;48:388–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Licastro F, Pedrini S, Govoni M, Pession A, Ferri C, Annoni G, et al. Apolipoprotein E and alpha-1-antichymotrypsin allele polymorphism in sporadic and familial Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett. 1999;270:129–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Engelhart MJ, Geerlings MI, Meijer J, Kiliaan A, Ruitenberg A, van Swieten JC, et al. Inflammatory proteins in plasma and the risk of dementia: the Rotterdam study. Arch Neurol. 2004;61:668–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Licastro F, Pedrini S, Caputo L, Annoni G, Davis LJ, Ferri C, et al. Increased plasma levels of interleukin-1, interleukin-6 and alpha-1-antichymotrypsin in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: peripheral inflammation or signals from the brain? J Neuroimmunol. 2000;103:97–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Nielsen H, Minthon L, Londos E, Blennow K, Miranda E, Perez J, et al. Plasma and CSF serpins in Alzheimer disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2007;69:1569–79.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Abraham CR, Selkoe DJ, Potter H. Immunochemical identification of the serine protease inhibitor alpha 1-antichymotrypsin in the brain amyloid deposits of Alzheimer’s disease. Cell. 1988;52:487–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Strittmatter WJ, Saunders AM, Schmechel D, Pericak-Vance M, Enghild J, Salvesen GS, et al. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:1977–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Licastro F, Masliah E, Pedrini S, Thal LJ. Blood levels of alpha-1-antichymotrypsin and risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease: effects of gender and apolipoprotein E genotype. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 1999;11:25–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Porcellini E, Davis EJ, Chiappelli M, Ianni E, Di Stefano G, Forti P, et al. Elevated plasma levels of alpha-1-anti-chymotrypsin in age-related cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease: a potential therapeutic target. Curr Pharm Des. 2008;14:2659–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Scacchi R, Ruggeri M, Gambina G, Martini MC, Ferrari G, Corbo RM. Plasma alpha1-antichymotrypsin in Alzheimer’s disease; relationships with APOE genotypes. Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:413–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Ayton S, Janelidze S, Roberts B, Palmqvist S, Kalinowski P, Diouf I, et al. Acute phase markers in CSF reveal inflammatory changes in Alzheimer’s disease that intersect with pathology, APOE epsilon4, sex and age. Prog Neurobiol. 2021;198:101904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Nilsson LN, Bales KR, DiCarlo G, Gordon MN, Morgan D, Paul SM, et al. Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin promotes beta-sheet amyloid plaque deposition in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21:1444–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Padmanabhan J, Levy M, Dickson DW, Potter H. Alpha1-antichymotrypsin, an inflammatory protein overexpressed in Alzheimer’s disease brain, induces tau phosphorylation in neurons. Brain. 2006;129:3020–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Giunta S, Galeazzi R, Marcellini M, Corder E, Galeazzi L. The inflammation-sensitive protein alpha 1-anti-chymotrypsin neutralizes fibrillar aggregation and cytotoxicity of the beta-amyloid peptide more effectively than alpha 1-antitrypsin. Clin Biochem. 2007;40:887–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Holmes C. Review: systemic inflammation and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2013;39:51–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Zhang R, Barker L, Pinchev D, Marshall J, Rasamoelisolo M, Smith C, et al. Mining biomarkers in human sera using proteomic tools. Proteomics. 2004;4:244–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Chang KH, Tseng MY, Ro LS, Lyu RK, Tai YH, Chang HS, et al. Analyses of haptoglobin level in the cerebrospinal fluid and serum of patients with neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;417:26–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Mortensen RF. C-reactive protein, inflammation, and innate immunity. Immunol Res. 2001;24:163–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Bode JG, Albrecht U, Haussinger D, Heinrich PC, Schaper F. Hepatic acute phase proteins--regulation by IL-6- and IL-1-type cytokines involving STAT3 and its crosstalk with NF-kappaB-dependent signaling. Eur J Cell Biol. 2012;91:496–505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Wood JA, Wood PL, Ryan R, Graff-Radford NR, Pilapil C, Robitaille Y, et al. Cytokine indices in Alzheimer’s temporal cortex: no changes in mature IL-1 beta or IL-1RA but increases in the associated acute phase proteins IL-6, alpha 2-macroglobulin and C-reactive protein. Brain Res. 1993;629:245–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hirai K, Hussey HJ, Barber MD, Price SA, Tisdale MJ. Biological evaluation of a lipid-mobilizing factor isolated from the urine of cancer patients. Cancer Res. 1998;58:2359–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Selva DM, Lecube A, Hernandez C, Baena JA, Fort JM, Simo R. Lower zinc-alpha2-glycoprotein production by adipose tissue and liver in obese patients unrelated to insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:4499–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Roher AE, Maarouf CL, Sue LI, Hu Y, Wilson J, Beach TG. Proteomics-derived cerebrospinal fluid markers of autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease. Biomarkers. 2009;14:493–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Shah RC, Buchman AS, Wilson RS, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA. Hemoglobin level in older persons and incident Alzheimer disease: prospective cohort analysis. Neurology. 2011;77:219–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Barnes LL, Wilson RS, Bienias JL, Schneider JA, Evans DA, Bennett DA. Sex differences in the clinical manifestations of Alzheimer disease pathology. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62:685–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Ruitenberg A, Ott A, van Swieten JC, Hofman A, Breteler MM. Incidence of dementia: does gender make a difference? Neurobiol Aging. 2001;22:575–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Kawakami M, Blum CB, Ramakrishnan R, Dell RB, Goodman DS. Turnover of the plasma binding protein for vitamin D and its metabolites in normal human subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1981;53:1110–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. White P, Cooke N. The multifunctional properties and characteristics of vitamin D-binding protein. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2000;11:320–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Disanto G, Ramagopalan SV, Para AE, Handunnetthi L. The emerging role of vitamin D binding protein in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol. 2011;258:353–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Bouillon R, Van Assche FA, Van Baelen H, Heyns W, De Moor P. Influence of the vitamin D-binding protein on the serum concentration of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Significance of the free 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 concentration. J Clin Invest. 1981;67:589–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Blanton D, Han Z, Bierschenk L, Linga-Reddy MV, Wang H, Clare-Salzler M, et al. Reduced serum vitamin D-binding protein levels are associated with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes. 2011;60:2566–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Ames RW, Horne AM, Mason BH, Wattie DJ, et al. Age-, gender-, and weight-related effects on levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are not mediated by vitamin D binding protein. Clin Endocrinol. 2007;67:259–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Wang J, Ohno-Matsui K, Yoshida T, Kojima A, Shimada N, Nakahama K, et al. Altered function of factor I caused by amyloid beta: implication for pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration from Drusen. J Immunol. 2008;181:712–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the Australian Imaging and Biomarker, Lifestyle (AIBL) research team (a complete list of researchers can be found at www.aibl.csiro.au) and the volunteers and their families. We would also like to acknowledge funding from the Dementia Collaborative Research Centres (DCRC), The Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program and the Wicking Trust. National Institutes of Health- Small Business Technology Transfer (NIH STTR grant 5R42RR021790, EAD PI), Center for Biological Research Excellence (NIH CoBRE grants 1P20RR024237 and 2P20GM 104935, EAD PI), Montana Board of Research and Commercialization Technology Grants: (MBRCT: 05-14, 06-46, and 08-17, EAD PI) and the Murdock Charitable Trust (EAD, PI). The Cooperative Research Centre for Mental Health, Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation grant (BRR, PI), Knott Family Equipment Grant (BRR, PI), the Pierce Armstrong Trust (BRR, PI), NHMRC Dementia Leadership Fellowship (BR, APP1138673), and NHMRC project grant (BR, APP1164692). The Florey Neuroproteomics Facility. We would like to thank the Melbourne Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics Facility of The Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute at The University of Melbourne for the support of mass spectrometry analysis.

Funding

National Institutes of Health

(5R42RR021790)

Dr. Edward A Dratz

National Institutes of Health

(1P20RR024237)

Dr. Edward A Dratz

National Health and Medical Research Council

(1164692)

Dr. Blaine R Roberts

National Health and Medical Research Council

(1138673)

Dr. Blaine R Roberts

Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation Dr. Blaine R Roberts

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health and The University of Melbourne Dementia Research Centre, Parkville, VIC, 3010, Australia

    Scott B. Laffoon, Kelly K. Pertile, Rebecca L. Rumble, Chris J. Fowler, Brett Trounson, David Ames, Ashley I. Bush & Colin L. Masters

  2. Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59715, USA

    Scott B. Laffoon, Benjamin D. Reeves, Paul A. Grieco & Edward A. Dratz

  3. Cooperative Research Centre for Mental Health, Carlton South, VIC, Australia

    Scott B. Laffoon, Ralph Martins, Ashley I. Bush & Colin L. Masters

  4. Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO and Cooperative Research Centre of Mental Health, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, 4029, Australia

    James D. Doecke

  5. Department of Biochemistry, Emory School of Medicine, 4001 Rollins Research Building, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Anne M. Roberts & Blaine R. Roberts

  6. Department of Neurology, Emory School of Medicine, 4001 Rollins Research Building, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA

    Anne M. Roberts & Blaine R. Roberts

  7. AIT Bioscience, 7840 Innovation Blvd., Indianapolis, IN, 46278, USA

    Jennifer A. Vance

  8. School of Medical Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia

    Ralph Martins

  9. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia

    Ralph Martins

Authors
  1. Scott B. Laffoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James D. Doecke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anne M. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jennifer A. Vance
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Benjamin D. Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kelly K. Pertile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rebecca L. Rumble
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chris J. Fowler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Brett Trounson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. David Ames
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ralph Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Ashley I. Bush
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Colin L. Masters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Paul A. Grieco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Edward A. Dratz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Blaine R. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.R.R., S.B.L. and E.A.D designed the research. S.B.L., B.R.R., A.M.R., J.A.V., B.D.R, K.K.P., R.L.R, C.J.F, and B.T. performed the experiments. P.A.G. and E.A.D. designed Zdye reagents. D.A., A.I.B., R.M., C.L.M. collection of clinical samples. S.B.L., B.R.R., A.M.R. and J.D.D. analyzed the data. S.B.L., E.A.D. and B.R.R. wrote the manuscript. All authors were involved in editing and critically revising the manuscript; and have read and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Blaine R. Roberts.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval for this study was provided by The University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee. Prior written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Consent for publication

All authors consent that the details and images will be freely available on the internet. None of the authors are government employees. All authors consent to the manuscript, text, and pictures being published by Proteome Science and used for commercial purposes. All authors have read and approved of the manuscript.

Competing interests

EAD and PAG are founders and shareholders in Zdye LLC, which licenses patents issued to Montana State University and reagents used in the present study. BRR, SBL and EAD are inventors on PCT application AU2014/000849. BRR receives research support from Agilent Technologies and from eMSion Inc. (OR, USA). All other authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Laffoon, S.B., Doecke, J.D., Roberts, A.M. et al. Analysis of plasma proteins using 2D gels and novel fluorescent probes: in search of blood based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. Proteome Sci 20, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-021-00185-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12953-021-00185-9

Keywords

Proteome Science

ISSN: 1477-5956