Open Access

Proteomic analysis of ‘Zaosu’ pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) and its red skin bud mutation

Proteome Science201210:51

https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-5956-10-51

Received: 17 February 2012

Accepted: 17 July 2012

Published: 29 August 2012

Abstract

Background

Breeding for strong red skin color is an important objective of the pear breeding program. There are few reports of proteome research in green skin pear and its red skin bud mutation. The manuscript at hand is one of the first studies dealing with 2D-PAGE-based analysis of pear fruits and leaves, establishing a suitable sample preparation and testing different 2D-PAGE protocols. Therefore, it may grant a basis for further studies on the pear proteome being the studies main goal. A proteomic analysis was conducted on leaves and fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) and its red skin bud mutation in order to reveal their genetic differences in the protein level.

Results

In the present study, the optimized two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis system of pear leaf and fruit was set up, and applied to analyze the leaves and fruit protein. The interesting peptide fragments were determined using 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOFTM Analyzer mass spectrometer, and the sequence obtained was blasted in NCBInr to identify the differentially-expressed protein. In the 1.5-fold differently-expressed proteins between ‘Zaosu’ pear and its mutant, 10 out of 35 proteins in fruit and 12 out of 24 ones in leaves were identified successfully. Among the 22 identified proteins, 7 protein spots were related to photosynthesis and energy metabolism; 4 were associated with environmental stress; 4 with disease defense; 2 with amino acid metabolism; 2 with cytoskeleton; 1 with antioxidant function; 1 with calcium metabolism; and 1 with unknown function. Moreover, related physiological index, such as chlorophyll content, Rubisco content and polyphone oxidase activity, were different between ‘Zaosu’ pear and its mutant.

Conclusion

A 2-D gel electrophoresis system of pear leaves and fruits was established, which was suitable for the analysis of proteome comparison. To the best of our knowledge, we have performed the first analysis of the proteomic changes in leaves and fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation. Our study provides important information on the use of proteomic methods for studying protein regulation of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation.

Keywords

PearRed skin bud mutationPlant proteomicsMALDI TOF/TOF-MS

Background

Pear is one of the most important fruit crops in the world. Breeding for strong red skin color is an important objective of the HortResearch interspecific pear breeding program [1]. The Asian pear cultivar ‘Zaosu’ (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) was commercialized in China. A bud mutation of ‘Zaosu’ pear which caused the red skin pigmentation was discovered in Shaanxi Province, China (Figure 1) [2]. The ‘Zaosu’ pear fruit is green at maturity, and then turns yellow when fully ripe. In contrast, this bud mutation fruit is red throughout the whole maturation stage, that is, its young leaves, flowers, buds and fruits are red. Through observation and field experiment for many years, the red skin character of this bud mutation has been stable. At present, there are some red pear germplasm resources in China, but such kind of bright color, high quality and large fruit-shaped cultivars are very scarce, and the European red pear cultivars are soft flesh texture. Therefore, this mutation is considered to be a unique and valuable germplasm resource of pear.
Figure 1

Phenotypes of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red bud mutation.

Since the proteomic approaches have been applied in fruit tree science, more and more researchers began to pay attention and actively participate in the proteomics. Prinsi et al. [3] performed a proteomic analysis on peach fruit mesocarp, and they set up a suitable protocol for improving protein extraction from peach mesocarp, and identified 53 differently abundant spots by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Muccilli et al. [4] used 2-DE with LC-MSMS to identify the differentially expressed proteome of a pigmented sweet orange (Citrus sinensis, cv. Moro) in comparison with a common cultivar (Cadenera), and identified 55 differentially expressed proteins. Feng et al. [5] studied the differential expression of protein in red pear after the bagging treatment, and they found 35 protein spots, and 21 spots were identified and classified into functional classes. Negri et al. [6] reported that analysis of the different proteins in the grape ripening process revealed 80 different-expressed protein spots, applied a two-way hierarchical clustering analysis to the proteins, and identified 69 proteins by LC-ESI-MS/MS. Martinez-Esteso et al. [7] investigated the changes in the extracellular proteome of a grapevine (Vitis vinifera cv. Gamay) cell suspension in response to elicitation with methylated cyclodextrins (MBCD) and methyl jasmonate, and identified 25 proteins by MALDI-TOF. These studies provided valuable experience for the subsequent researchers. At present, however, no studies have been reported to date of the differential expression of protein in green skin pear and its red skin bud mutation.

In the present study, we used young leaves and fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation as materials to develop an efficient two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis system, and find the differently-expressed proteins with mass spectrometer. The results may reveal their genetic differences in the protein level.

Results and discussion

The set screening of 2-DE gel electrophoresis for leaves and fruits of pear

In order to select the most suitable parameters for 2-DE gel electrophoresis for leaves and fruits of pear, we used IPG strips with 7 cm pH 4-7 and pH 3-10 combined with IEF Procedure 2. The proteomic analysis with pH 3-10 showed that the pear protein spots distributed mainly within the range of pH 4-7 (Figure 2A). Importantly, 282 protein spots were detected on pH 3-10 IPG strip, while 377 spots were on pH 4-7 IPG strip (Figure 2B). For total cellular protein samples from pear leaves, pH 4-7 IPG strip was applied and 500 μg of protein sample was loaded and rehydrated, then IEF Procedure 1 or 2 was applied to obtain the following 2-D gel images (Figure 2C, D). The detected protein spots were 163 and 252 using Procedure 1 and 2, respectively. Therefore, IEF Procedure 1 with relatively high quality of proteomic image was selected for the further study.
Figure 2

Two-dimensional gel images using different pH IPG and IEF procedures. A. 7 cm pH 3-10; B. 7 cm pH 4-7; C. 17 cm IEF Procedure 1; D. 17 cm Procedure 2.

Comparative analysis of 2-DE gel from leaves and fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation

We conducted the analysis on 2-DE gels between ‘Zaosu’ pear leaves (Figure 3A), fruits (Figure 3C) and the red skin bud mutation leaves (Figure 3B), fruits (Figure 3D) by PDQuest 2-DE 8.0.1 software. There are 24 protein spots detected whose normalized volumes were in at least a 2:1 ratio between the two leaves samples (Among them, 15 spots were up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation, 6 spots were down-regulated. There is 1 spot specifically expressed in the red skin bud mutation, 2 spots specifically in ‘Zaosu’ pear.), and 35 protein spots detected between the two fruits samples (Among them, 15 spots were up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation. 12 spots were down-regulated. There is 6 spots specifically expressed in the red skin bud mutation, 2 spots specifically in ‘Zaosu’ pear). After we conducted the cluster analysis of the peak value which showed in the results of PDquest software, 15 spots from leaves and 10 spots from fruits were chosen for MALDI-TOF-TOF/MS analysis. The results indicated that 12 spots in leaves were successfully identified, among the 12 spots, 8 spots (D4, D9, D10, D11, D14, D16, D17 and D18, Figure 4) were up-regulated, 3 spots (D6, D7 and D13, Figure 4) were down-regulated and 1 spot (D15, Figure 4) specifically expressed in the redskin bud mutation. 10 spots in fruits were successfully identified, among 10 spots, 3 spots (E1, E2 and E3) down-regulated, 5 spots (D19, D20, D21, D23, D24, Figure 4) up-regulated, 1 spots (E4) only exist in ‘Zaosu’ and 1 spot (D22, Figure 4) only exist in the red skin bud mutation. Cluster analysis of 2-DE gel data was performed with PermuMatrix (Figure 5), and in generally the figure can reflect the protein expression more intuitively.
Figure 3

Two-dimensional images of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red mutation. A. leaf of ‘Zaosu’ pear; B. leaf of the red mutation C. fruit of ‘Zaosu’ pear; D. fruit of the red mutation.

Figure 4

Magnified Images of the differential proteins between ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red mutation. The 22 successful identified protein spots in ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red mutation. A: leaf of ‘Zaosu’ pear; B: leaf of the red mutation; C: fruit of ‘Zaosu’ pear; D: fruit of the red mutation.

Figure 5

Clustering analysis of 2-DE gel data. Data from 24 spots and 35 spots (the spot IDs such as D* and E* has been detected by MALDI-TOF-TOF/MS) that showed an at least 1.5-fold change in their relative volume between ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation leaves and fruits (A comes from leaves and B comes from fruits), were subjected to two-way hierarchical cluster analysis, performed with PermutMatrix. Pearson’s distance and Ward’s algorithm were used. Each coloured cell represents the average of the relative spot volumes, according to the colour scale depicted at the bottom of the figure.

MALDI-TOF-TOF-MS/MS Analysis and protein identification

Generally, 22 spots were successfully identified in leaves and fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation. The basic information of identified protein was listed in Table 1, such as pI, retrieval registration number, protein score, protein molecular weight, and protein name. D4-D18 are information from leaf proteins, while D19-E4 are information from fruit protein. D16 and E3 are EST sequences. In order to conduct further study about the changes of physiological and biochemical parameters by the red skin buds mutation, we get a more detailed protein information by searching for relevant literature. Heat shock protein 70 (D4) was identified from cucumber. It has 23 peptides matched, and the protein was up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation. HSP70 is a family of ubiquitously expressed heat shock proteins. The HSP70s are an important group of family members of the cell’s machinery for protein folding, and help to protect cells from stress. Rrubulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylate/oxygenize large subunit (D6) was identified from hydrangea arborescens. It has 21 peptides matched, and the protein was down-regulated in the mutant. It is most commonly known by the shorter name RuBisCo, which is an enzyme involved in the Calvin cycle that catalyzes the first major step of carbon fixation. Ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylate/oxygenize large subunit precursor (D7) was identified as from Liquidambar styraciflua, with 14 matched peptides. It was down-regulated in the mutant. After being modified by related enzymes, it becomes RuBisCo. LHC-type-chlorophyll-a/b binding protein (D9) was identified from mung bean, with 3 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. The overall structure of PSII is known to be extremely complex with six different pigment-binding subunits having purely antenna function and an additional subunit binding the RC pigments. The outer or peripheral antenna, which consists of a family of chl a-b-binding proteins, is known to be responsible for about 60% of total light absorption in PSII. Calreticulin (D10) was identified from Prunus serrulata, with 14 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. Calreticulin is an essential Ca2+-binding/storage chaperon resident protein of endoplasmic reticulum or sarcoplasmic reticulum existing in a diverse range of species. The protein is involved in the regulation of intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ storage capacity, and is also an important molecular chaperone involved in “quality control” within secretory pathways. Putative pyridoxine biosynthesis protein isoform A (D11) was identified from tobacco, with 8 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. This protein was mainly related to plasma membrane and end membrane system, as a rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of vitamin B6. Ribulose diphosphate carboxylate/oxygenize activates, chloroplast (D13) was identified from Buschohne, with 7 matched peptides. It was down-regulated in the mutant. RubisCO activates is considered to function as catalysis of Rubisco for Carbinol and binding to Mg2+ to dynamic. Mitochondrial heat shock 70 kDa protein (D14) was identified from Buschohne, with 12 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. The HSP70 located in the mitochondria not only has the molecular chaperone function [8], but also improves the resilience of plant and protect the electron transport during the process of oxidative phosphorylation [9, 10]. Os03g0718100 (D15) was identified from Japanese rice, it has 14 peptides were matched. Only exist in the red skin bud mutation. It is one kind of actin which was regarded as an internal standard, and class belongs to the housekeeper protein, acts as a load controllers. Pbzs315 (D16) was identified as EST sequence from ‘Zaosu’ pear, with 6 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. Its biological function was to improve the disease resistance. Oxygen-evolving complex protein 1 (D17) was identified form rice, with 11 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. Its main function involves in the process of photosynthetic oxygen evolution, as manganese containing external membrane protein. NAD-dependent maleate dehydrogenase (D18) was identified form peach, with 8 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. Maleate dehydrogenase is an enzyme in the citric acid cycle that catalyzes the conversion of maleate into oxaloacetate (using NAD+) and vice versa, mainly involved in energy metabolism. A high molecular weight heat shock protein (D19) was identified from Apple, with 24 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. Generally, heat shock protein which greater than HSP70 we called high molecular weight heat shock protein. It is associated with stress resistance. Polyphone oxidase precursor (D20) was identified from apricot, with 4 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. It is the precursor of polyphone oxidase, which catalyzes the o-hydroxylation of monophenols to o-diaphanous. It may also be referred as tyrosinases. (D21) was identified as coffee acid 3-O-methyltransferase, from apricot, with 7 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. It controls S-lignin (lignin monomer) specific pathway, as well as improves disease resistance. Actin (D22) was identified from Gossypium hirsutum, with 16 matched peptides. It was only exist in the red skin bud mutation. It is an important component of plant cytoskeleton, and has important significance in maintaining the normal physiological and biochemical processes. S-adenosylmethionine synthase 2 (D23) was identified from Autumn Oleaster, with 14 matched peptides. It was up-regulation in the mutant. It is an enzyme which catalyses the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) from methionine and ATP. Polyphone oxidase 2 precursor (D24) was identified from apple, with 7 matched peptides. It was up-regulated in the mutant. It is one of precursor of polyphone oxidase. Ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylate (E1) was identified from Loeseneriella A.C. Smith, with 10 matched peptides. It was down-regulation in the mutant. It is an important regulatory enzyme of photosynthetic carbon metabolism. Heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein 2 (E2) was identified from tomato, with 22 matched peptides. It is specially expressed in ‘Zaosu’ pear. It is one of HSP70 family, and can be markedly induced under stress. Ipa. ADAB-aaa60g07.b1 (E3) was identified as EST sequence from peanut, with 11 matched peptides. It was down-regulation in the mutant. It is an expressed sequence tag. Putative methionine synthase (E4) was identified from Arabidopsis, with 12 matched peptides. It is specifically expressed in ‘Zaosu’ pear. Methionine synthase is responsible for the regeneration of methionine from homocysteine. It also participates in the S-adenosylmethionine biosynthesis and regeneration cycle.
Table 1

Proteins result analyzed and identified by MALDI-TOF-TOF/MS

Spot no

Protein name

Accession no.

Protein MW/PI

Pep. count

Proten score

Ratio ‘Zaosu’/the red mutant

Relative protein content

Photosynthetic and energy metabolism proteins

 

  D6

ribìlose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase large subunit

gi|15148414

52493.4/6.32

21

702

2.57

  D7

ribìlose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase large subunit Precursor

gi|7008057

53067.6/6.04

14

520

1.62

  D9

LHCII type I chlorophyll a/b binding protein

gi|8954293

27900.1/5.29

3

102

0.47

  D13

Ribìlose bisphosphate carboxylase/ oxygenase activase

gi|10720248

48341.7/8.19

7

322

5.97

  D17

oxygen-evolving complex protein 1

gi|739292

26603.5/5.13

11

576

0.42

  D18

NAD-dependent malate dehydrogenase

gi|15982948

35817.5/6.6

8

255

0.49

  E1

ribìlose1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase

gi|9909955

52296.2/6.04

10

305

2.60

Stress-related proteins

  

  D4

Heat shock protein 70 [Cucumis sativus]

gi|1143427

75480/5.15

23

850

0.51

  D14

shock 70 kDa protein, mitochondrial

gi|399940

72720.6/5.95

12

98

0.37

  D19

high molecìlar weight heat shock protein

gi|6969976

71570.4/5.17

24

743

0.37

  E2

Heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein 2

gi|123620

71062/5.08

22

555

3.47

Disease resistance-related proteins

  

  D16

Pbzs315 SSH cDNA library of pear cv. ‘Zaosu’ inocìlated with Venturia nashicola Pyrus x bretschneideri cDNA, mRNA sequence

gi|255987829

35747.7/9.88

6

279

0.33

  D20

polyphenol oxidase precursor

gi|3282505

67432.9/6.39

4

273

0.47

  D21

S-adenosysl-L-methionine:caffeic acid3-O-methyltransferase

gi|3913295

40135.3/5.52

7

247

0.38

  D24

polyphenol oxidase 2 precursor

gi|14194273

65762/6.09

7

178

1.72

Cytoskeleton-related proteins

  

  D15

Os03g0718100

gi|115454971

42014/5.3

14

255

Only observed in the red mutant

  D22

actin

gi|32186902

42057.1/5.3

16

531

Only observed in the red mutant

Amino acid metabolism-related proteins

  

  D23

S-adenosylmethionine synthase

gi|75308025

43564.9/5.5

14

635

0.53

  E4

putative methionine synthase

gi|14532772

84899.8/6.09

12

148

Only observed in ‘Zaosu’ pear

Antioxidant-related proteins

  

  D11

Putative pyridoxine biosynthesis protein isoform A

gi|46399269

33353.1/5.93

8

218

0.24

Calcium-related proteins

  

  D10

Calreticìlin

gi|11131904

48557.5/4.4

14

380

0.49

Others

  

  E3

Ipa. ADAB-aaa60g07.b1 IPA1-seed Arachis ipaensis cDNA 5', mRNA sequence

gi|296593933

23794.4/9.29

11

92

1.60

After being identified by mass spectrometry and queried the protein database, all identified proteins were classified into the following groups according to biological function: photosynthetic and energy metabolism proteins, antioxidant proteins, anti-stress proteins, amino acid metabolism proteins, cytoskeleton related proteins and Calcium-related proteins.

Photosynthetic and energy metabolism proteins

There are 7 proteins (D18, D6, D7, E1, D13, D9 and D17) which take part in photosynthetic and energy metabolism. Among the identified proteins, D6, D7, D13 and E1 were all down-regulated in red mutant, D9, D17 and D18 were up-regulated. Light-harvesting pigment system consists of a variety of colors and protein complexes. Normal (green) leaves contain more chlorophyII, while yellow leaves contain more caroteoids. When there are more soluble sugars in vivo, more anthocyanin would be formed and leaves become red. The light absorbed by anthocyanin is not used for photosynthesis. Photo system II (PSII) includes the reaction center, light-harvesting complex II (LHC II) and a manganese cluster of oxygen evolving complex. The main function of oxygen evolving complex in light-harvesting pigment system is to harvest light, and to transfer light to the reaction center pigment. Chlorophyll a/b binding protein performs the function of pigment molecules. LHC II in chloroplast thylakoids is the most abundant protein as an antenna, and it has four functions as follows: to transfer and harvest light, distribute and balance the energy between PSII and PSI, protect light and excess energy dissipation, and maintain the structure of thylakoid [1115]. Oxygen-evolving complex protein makes thermodynamically-stable water lionize and release oxygen in relatively mild conditions, and a catalyst must be involved this reaction [1619].

Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylate/oxygenize is a bifunctional enzyme [20], which catalyzes reaction of RuBP carboxylation in C3 pathway. It is the key enzyme in photosynthetic carbon assimilation, and catalyzes the RuBP oxygenize reaction in photorespiration. Therefore, the enzyme in the regulation of photosynthesis and photorespiration rate is crucial to the net photosynthethesis. RuBisCO requires a phthalocyanine of ammonia and Mg2+ binding for the activity of catalytic. RuBisCO activates was the chloroplast enzyme coded by nuclear genes [21]. It can remove sugar phosphate inhibitors on RuBisCO active site, and catalyzes CO2 and Mg2+ to bind with RuBisCO. The activates is now identified to be a member of the AAA+ family, whose members participate in macromolecular complexes that perform diverse chaperon-like functions [22].

NAD-dependent maleate dehydrogenase (MDH) is an enzyme commonly existing in animals, plants and microorganisms. MDH mainly involves in the tricarboxylic acid cycle, reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolism and energy metabolism of mitochondria in plant. It is also a key enzyme for oxaloacetate regeneration, and catalyzes H+ of hydroxyl in malice acid detected to NAD(P)+ and generates oxaloacetate, which is a reversible reaction. In this study, NAD-dependent maleate dehydrogenase was upregulated in the mutant, suggesting that respiratory metabolism of the red skin bud mutation might be enhanced.

In the present study, proteins related to light reaction were identified: oxygen-evolving complex protein 1 (D17) and LHCII type I chlorophyll a/b binding protein (D9). Both of them were up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation. As the two proteins were important in Photo System II (PSII), we assume that PSII increased in the bud mutation. PSII is the most important light reaction center and LHC II is the most abundant light-harvesting complex in chloroplast thylakoids, the higher expression of these proteins may contribute to enhancement of the ability to the light reaction stage. Interestingly, 4 photosynthesis Calvin cycle related protein (D6, D7, D13, E1), Rubisco (in leaf), Rubisco (in fruit), Rubisco Precursor and Rubisco activates, were down-regulated in the mutant. Rubisco is the key regulatory enzyme in the ‘light-independent reactions’ of the photosynthesis Calvin cycle [23]. Both of Rubisco precursor and Rubisco activates were down-regulated, suggesting the decline of carbon reaction. We speculate that there are a large number of anthocyanins in the red skin bud mutation, and the light absorption by anthocyanin is not used for photosynthesis, and only stays in light reaction stage, but does not take part in carbon reaction, resulting in the improvement of the ability of light reaction and decrease of the ability of carbon reaction. Moreover, it was found that PPO precursor expression was up-regulated in the mutant, as well as the enzyme activity, indicating that the red bud mutation may has stronger disease resistance. However, the detailed mechanism is not clear.

Stress-related proteins

There were 4 stress-related proteins detected as followed: D4, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70); D14, heat shock protein 70 in mitochondrial; D19, high molecular weight heat shock protein; E2, heat shock cognate 70 kDa protein 2; D19 and E2 originate from fruit, and D4 and D14 originate from leaf. Among them, D4, D14 and D19 were all up-regulate and E2 was down-regulate. All of them belong to the same shock protein family. Heat shock protein is one kind of conservative family protein. Stress protein will be synthesized when organism faces stress factors such as heavy metal, hypoxia, high temperature and frost [24, 25]. HSP often have a molecular chaperone function [8]. However, heat shock proteins in mitochondrial (MT-HSP) also have the function that other small molecules do not have, such as improving the heat resistance and the cold resistance of plants [10]. In addition, in the process of oxidative phosphorylation MT-HSP protects the electron transport [26]. Researchers have found that HSP90 not only exist in the cytoplasm, but also in the nucleus and endoplasmic reticulum [27]. HSP70 is able to participate in disposal of damaged or defective proteins. Interaction with CHIP (Carboxyl-terminus of HSP70 interacting protein)-an E2 ubiquitin ligase allows HSP70 to pass proteins to the cell’s ubiquitination and proteolysis pathway [26, 28]. In this study, 4 protein members in heat shock protein family were detected. They are in cytoplasmic and organelle from both fruits and leaves. E2 is unique in ‘Zaosu’pear and the other three are up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation. As expected, the red skin bud mutation has greatly improved resistance ability and acts an active role in regulation of cell death and error protein degradation.

Disease resistance-related proteins

4 proteins related to disease resistance were detected as followed: D16, pbzs315; D20, polyphone oxidase precursor; D21, coffee acid 3-O-methyltransferase (COMT); D24, polyphone oxidase 2 precursor; D16 originates from leaves, and D20, D21 and D24 originate from fruit. All of them were identified up-regulate in “Zaosu” red bud mutant. D16 is a EST sequence. Polyphone oxidase (D20) is combined with thylakoid membranes in plant tissue. It is a tetramer which contains four atoms of copper per molecule, and binding sites for two aromatic com pounds and oxygen. The enzyme catalyzes the o-hydroxylation of monophenols to o-diaphanous. The substances containing o-diaphanous have the function of disease resistance. Pathogen-related protein PPO protects cells against the pathogens by catalyzing synthesis of lignin and quinones. The PPO activity also showed higher in the mutant. Moreover, there are 2 spots detected to be up-regulated in the fruit of redskin bud mutation, which indicates the enhancement in disease resistance of redskin bud mutation. COMT (D21) is a key enzyme in lignin-specific synthesis pathway to regulate the specific synthesis of syringe lignin monomers. The enzyme catalyzes caffeicacid to ferulic acid, and 5-hydroxyl ferulic acid to sinapic acid. In the process of plant growth and development, lignin gradually penetrated into the cell wall, and increased the hardness of the cell wall. Lin YZ [29] reported that COMT participated in the biosynthesis and transportation of lignin in the probenazole-induced resistance in rice. In our study, it was found that COMT was up-regulated in the mutant, indicating that ‘Zaosu’ Red may have stronger lignin synthesis ability. PBZS315 is a cDNA squequence, which is a disease-resistance gene find in the study of pear scab (Venturia pyrina Aderh.). This gene was up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation, which may contribute to the enhancement of red skin bud mutation’s disease resistance. Because of the all up-regulate, we conjectured that the red mutation maybe more disease-resistant than ‘Zaosu’ pear.

Cytoskeleton-related proteins

2 cytoskeleton-related proteins were detected as followed: D15 Os03g0718100 and D22 actin. D15 originates from leaf and D22 originates from fruit. D15 and D22 are all only exist in red bud mutation. Actin is the monomeric subunit of two types of filaments, and it is a globular roughly moonlighting protein in all eukaryotic cells. Actin participates in many important cellular processes of eukaryotic cells according to change the physical and chemical state of cells. The change of actin is a very import factor of cell division in the process of cellular division. Baluska et al. [30] found that cell wall pectin’s of meristematic maize root cells undergo rapid endocytosis in an F-actin-dependent manner. Starr and Han [31] reported that the actin cytoskeleton positioned nuclei in a variety of systems from yeast to plants and animal. In this study, D15 is one kind of actin which is named as Actin-1. It is a highly conserved protein to participate in many types of cell movement. It suggests that there may be a change in cytoskeleton and morphological of the red skin bud mutation. As actins in leaves and fruits are not the same, indicating that actin in different organs has its own specific expression.

Amino acid metabolism-related proteins

There were 2 amino acid metabolism-related proteins detected as followed: D23 S-adenosylmethionine synthase and E4 putative methionine synthase. Both originate from fruit. S-adenosylmethionine synthase is an enzyme is the key enzyme to catalyze the synthesis of S-adenosylmethionie (SAM) from methionine and ATP. SAM is precursors of biosynthetic of ethylene [32] and polyamine [33], and participates in the process of transfer methyl and aminopropyl to nucleonic acid, protein and fat. In addition, SAM can be used as antioxidants. In this study, E4 only exists in Zaosu pear, but D23 was up-regulated in the mutation. We speculated that methionine cycle may be different in the red skin bud mutation.

Antioxidant-related proteins

Only D11, Putative pyridoxine biosynthesis protein isoform A, was detected. The previous study showed that pyridoxine biosynthesis protein mainly related with plasma membrane and membrane system. It is also a rate-limiting enzyme in the process of vitamin B6 synthesis [34]. Vitamin B6 is a necessary element for all organisms, and it is cofactor of enzyme as an antioxidant in many metabolic pathways [35, 36]. Since putative pyridoxine biosynthesis protein is up-regulation in leaf, it can increase the synthesis of vitamin B6, thus enhancing the ability of antioxidant in the red skin bud mutation.

Calcium-related proteins

There was one calcium-related proteins protein (D10: Calreticulin) detected. It comes from leaf. Calreticulin is a multifunctional protein that binds Ca2+ ions. Calreticulin is located in storage compartments associated with the endoplasmic reticulum. It can be molecular chaperones of new synthesized protein. It has the function of regulate calcium balance, assists protein folding and processing, such as the endoplasmic reticulum custody protein, Calcium storage, signal transduction, regulate gene expression and apoptosis. In this study, Calcium was up-regulated in the red skin bud mutation. Thus, it is speculated that the toughness of cells increased, the ability of regulate and signal transduction was enhanced in the red skin bud mutation, leading to enhancement of the ability of resistance and stress response of plant.

Gene ontology (GO) annotation and protein classification

Subcellular locations of the proteins were assigned according to the GO annotations. (Figure 6) D4, D6, D7, D9, D13, D17 and E1 were according to chloroplast. Therein, D6, D7, D9 and E1 were annotated in chloroplast; D13 was annotated in chloroplast stromal; D17 was annotated in chloroplast thylakoid membrane. D15, D22 and D23 were classified in cytoplasm. D14 was annotated in mitochondrion and D10 was in end plastic reticulum lumen. Others were not annotated in Gene ontology.
Figure 6

The subcellular location of identified proteins. Subcellular locations of the proteins were assigned according to the GO annotations and are expressed as percentages of the assigned proteins.

Chlorophyll content and the related enzyme activity

In order to reveal the different physiological traits between ‘Zaosu’ and its red bud mutation, we performed a series of physiological experiments. Chlorophyll II content, Rubisco content and PPO activity were measured. The result were showed in the Table 2.
Table 2

Chlorophyll content, rubisco content and PPO activity

 

Chlorophyll content(mg/g)

Rubisco content(mg/g)

PPO activity(U·mg/ml)

‘Zaosu’ pear

33.4 ± 2.74a

72.71 ± 6.23a

16

red mutation

29.37 ± 3.21a

54.8 ± 5.33b

22

The data suggested that the chlorophyll content in ‘Zaosu’ pear was insignificantly higher, but do not have significant different with the red mutation while rubisco content in ‘Zaosu’ pear was significantly higher than that in the red mutation; PPO activity in the red mutation was significantly higher compared to ‘Zaosu’ pear.

Conclusion

In summary, the optimized two-dimensional (2-D) gel electrophoresis system of pear leaf and fruit was set up, and applied to analyze the leaves and fruits protein. We have performed the first analysis of the proteomic changes in leaves and fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation. We identified a series of proteins that are related mainly to the Photosynthetic and energy metabolism, stress resistance, diseases resistance, amino acid metabolism, cytoskeleton, and antioxidant. Our study provides important information on the use of proteomic methods for studying protein regulation of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red skin bud mutation.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The leaves of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red mutation were collected from the Germplasm Resources orchard of Northwest A and F University in mid April, 2009. The young fruits of ‘Zaosu’ pear and its red mutation were harvested from the experimental orchard of Weinan city, Shaanxi province in early May, 2009. The leaves and fruits frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately were stored at -80°C.

Protein extraction

Protein extraction was performed according to Gallardo K [37]. Approximately 1.5-2 g of pear leaves or fruits mixed in PVPP, according to the proportion of 1/5, and 0.1 g DTT were ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen with mortar and pestle. Each microgram of protein powder precipitated with 15 μl of cold phenol extraction buffer [7 mol/l urea, 2 mol/l theorem, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 65 mmol/l DTT, 0.2% (v/v) IPG buffer (pH 4-7; Bio-Rad, USA)]. After being vortex blended and incubated for 1 h at 4°C, proteins were collected by centrifugation at 12000 g for 40 min at 4°C and the supernatant stored at -20°C. Protein content was estimated by Bradford assay [38].

Different sets of 2-DE gel electrophoresis

The IPG strips with pH 4-7 and pH 3-10 were tested, combined with bioelectric focusing (IEF) Procedure 1 (active rehydration at 50 V for 12 h at 17°C, S1 linear 250 V 30 min, S2 rapid 500 V 30 min, S3 rapid 1000 V 1 h, S4 linear 10,000 V 4 h, S5 rapid 10,000 V 60 kVh, S6 rapid 500 V 24 h) or bioelectric focusing (IEF) Procedure 2 (active rehydration at 50 V for 12 h at 17°C, S1 linear 250 V 30 min, S2 rapid 500 V 30 min, S3 rapid 1000 V 1 h, S4 linear 8,000 V 4 h, S5 rapid 8,000 V 60 kVh, S6 rapid 500 V 24 h). The results indicate that pH 4-7, 17 cm IPG strips combined with Procedure 1 was applied in the pear protein sample in this study.

2-DE gel electrophoresis and protein visualization

Protein (1000 μg, 350 μl) were loaded onto pH 4-7, 17 cm IPG strips with active rehydration for 12 h in [7 mol/l urea, 2 mol/l theorem, 4% (w/v) CHAPS, 65 mmol/l DTT, 0.2% (v/v) IPG buffer (pH 4-7), trace bromophenol blue]. Bioelectric focusing (IEF) procedure was performed at 25°C using the following setting: S1 linear 250 V 30 min, S2 rapid 500 V 30 min, S3 rapid 1000 V 1 h, S4 linear 10,000 V 4 h, S5 rapid 10,000 V 60 kVh, S6 rapid 500 V 24 h. After IEF, strips were equilibrated by gentle shaking for 15 min in equilibration buffer I [6 mol/l urea, 2% (w/v) SDS, 0.374 mol/l Tris–HCl pH 8.8, 20% (w/v) glycerol, 2% (w/v) DTT] and for an additional 15 min equilibrate in equilibration bufferII(DTT was replaced with 2.5% iodoacetamide for cysteine alkylation). The second-dimensional SDS-PAGE was performed with 12% polyacrylamide gel in Protein cell IEF (BIO-RAD, USA). The parameter of electrophoresis: 100 V 30 min, 180 V 6 h.

The gels were stained in the base of colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 [39]. Then, the gels were first washed by Milli-Q water for 3 times (5 min each time) and fasten in fixative solution [40% (v/v) ethanol, 10% (v/v) acetic acid, 10% (v/v) carbinol] for 1 h. After washed by mili-Q water for 3 times again, the gel stained by colloidal Coomassie Brilliant Blue [0.1% (w/v) CBB G-250, 10% (w/v) ammonium sulfate, 1.2% (v/v) phosphoric acid, 20% (v/v) ethanol] over night. The stained gels distained by distaining solution [10% (v/v) ethanol, 10% (v/v) acetic acid] until background clear so far.

Image acquisition and cluster analysis

The gel images were acquired using an Powerlook2100XL optical density scanner and import into the PDQuest 8.0.1 (Bio-Rad, Hercules CA, USA) image software for analysis. A total of gels, resulting from three technical replicates for each biological replicate, were analyzed. The significance of changes of individual proteins between two physiological states was evaluated by the quantitative set with 1.5-fold change. Permut Matrix was used to conduct the cluster analysis for leaves and fruits, respectively, and the parameters were set as following: Dissimilarity: Pearson’s distance, Hierarchical: Ward’s Minimu Variance Meth, Used dataset: Normalize Rows (z-score).

In-Gel tryptic digestion

After analysis by PDQuest image software, differential protein spots were excised from the preparative gels and stored in 2 ml eppendorf pipes. The gel pieces destained with 300 μl 100 mmol/l NH4HCO3 and 30% ACN (acrylonitrile). After removed the distaining buffer using 100% ACN, the gel pieces were lyophilized by lyophilizer. The dry gel pieces were rehydrated in 5 μl solution containing 2.5-10 ng/μl trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) for approximately 20 h. After taking hydrolysate out, they remained peptides was extracted in 100 μl of 60% CAN by sonication. Extracts were pooled together and lyophilized. The resulting lyophilized tryptic peptides were kept for mass spectrometric analysis.

MALDI-TOF-TOF/MS Analysis

MS spectra analysis for peptides obtained using the 4800 Plus MALDI TOF/TOFTM Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA). Analysis completed on behalf of institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology Shanghai Institute for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Database search and protein identification

The MS spectral data obtained using GPS Explore software for analysis, and the results of each sample integrate together into one file. The results were searched against the NCBInr database using the software MASCOT (Matrix Science, London, U.K.). The parameter settings of MASCOT were as the followings: trypsin as digesting enzyme with 1 missed cleavage allowed; search type set to peptide mass fingerprint; green plant set as search species; peptide mass tolerance set to 100 ppm; fragment tolerance set to ± 0.4 Da; carbamidomethyl C set as fixed modification; monoisotopic mass values set as protein quality; peptide charge state ion source set to +1; pI and MW is not required.

Measurement of chlorophyll content

Chlorophyll content of pear leaves was determined according to Gao JF [40]. 0.1-0.2 g of pear leaves were powdered with 0.5 ml acetone. Then used 10-15 ml 80%(v/v) acetone washed the powder into centrifuge tube and digested over night. The extract diluted 10-fold and measured the absorbance of 665 nm and 649 nm. Used following formula calculate chlorophyll content
Chlorophyll content mg / g = 20.29 × A 645 + 8.05 × A 663 × V W × 1000 × n

(A645: absorbance in 645 nm, A663: absorbance in 663 nm, V: volume of acetone, W: weight of leaves, n: dilution).

Measurement of rubisco

Rubisco content of pear leaves was determined according to Lilley RM [41]. Briefly, 5 g of pear leaves were frozen and powdered in liquid nitrogen, with 10 ml extraction ice-cold extraction buffer (50 mmol l-1 pH 7.5 Tries–HCl, 1 mmol l-1 EDTA, 10 mmol l-1 MgCl2, 12.5% (v/v) glycerol, 10 mmol l-1 β-mercaptoethanol, 1% PVP). The extract was stored at 4°C for 1 h, and then centrifuged at 5000 g for 15 min. The resulting supernatant was the crude enzyme extract. 100 ul crude enzyme extract added 1 ml brand ford working solution and placed in room temperature for 10 minutes. The content of Rubisco was spectrophotometrically monitored at 595 nm. The 100 ul PBS mixture 1 ml brand ford working solution was used as the blank [38].

Assay of polyphone oxidase activity

The assay of PPO activity was conducted following the method by Kevin C et al. [42]. Fruit flesh tissues (10 g) were collected and homogenized with 25 ml of ice-cold extraction buffer (100 mmol l-1 sodium phosphate, pH 6.4), containing 0.5 g of polyvinyl polypyrrolidone (PVPP). The homogenate was centrifuged (4°C, 15,000 g, 50 min) and the supernatants were analyzed immediately. PPO activity was measured by incubating 0.5 ml of enzyme preparation in 3 ml of buffer substrate (100 mmol l-1 sodium phosphate (pH 6.4), and 500 mmol l-1 catechol) and monitoring the change of absorbance at 398 nm for 10 s. The specific activity was expressed as U mg l-1 protein, while the unit was defined as 0.001 of ΔOD398 min-1.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31171925) and China Agriculture Research System (No. CARS-29-40).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
College of Horticulture, Northwest A & F University
(2)
Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology and Germplasm Innovation in Northwest China, Ministry of Agriculture

References

  1. Volz RK, White AG, Brewer LR: Breeding for red skin color in interspecific pears. Acta Hort 2008, 800: 469–474.Google Scholar
  2. Xu LF: A fine line of precocity red pear. Shanxi Fruits 2009, 4: 44–45.Google Scholar
  3. Prinsi B, Negri AS, Fedeli C, Morgutti S, Negrini N, Cocucci M, Espen L: Peach fruit ripening: A proteomic comparative analysis of the mesocarp of two cultivars with different flesh firmness at two ripening stages. Phytochemistry 2011, 72: 1251–1262. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.012View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Muccilli V, Licciardello C, Fontanini D, Russo MP, Cunsolo V, Saletti R, Recupero GR, Foti S: Proteome analysis of Citrus Sinensis L. (Osbeck) flesh at ripening time. J Proteomics 2009, 73: 134–52. 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.09.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng S, Chen X, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Song Y, Chen XL, Li X, Li M, Liu J, Wang Q, Liu M: Differential expression of proteins in red pear following fruit bagging treatment. Protein J 2011, 30: 194–200. 10.1007/s10930-011-9320-6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Negri AS, Prinsi B, Rossoni M, Failla O, Scienza A, Cocucci M, Espen L: Proteome changes in the skin of the grape cultivar Barbera among different stages of ripening. BMC Genomics 2008, 9: 378. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-378View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Martinez-Esteso MJ, Sellés-Marchart S, Vera-Urbina JC, Pedreño MA, Bru-Martinez R: Changes of defense proteins in the extracellular proteome of grapevine ( Vitis vinifera cv. Gamay) cell cultures in response to elicitors. Proteomics 2009, 73: 331–41. 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.10.001View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Hartman DJ, Dougan D, Hoogenraad NJ, Høj PB: Heat shock proteins of barley mitochondria and chloroplasts. Identification of organellar hsp 10 and 12: putative chaperonin 10 homologues. FEBS Letters 1992, 305: 147–150. 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80883-IView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lund AA, Blum PH, Bhattramakki D, Elthon T: Heat-stress response of maize mitochondria. Plant Physiol 1998, 116: 1097–1110. 10.1104/pp.116.3.1097View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sanmiya K, Suzuki K, Egawa Y: Mitochondrial small heat shock protein enhances thermotolerance in tobacco plants. FEBS Lett 2004, 557: 265–268. 10.1016/S0014-5793(03)01494-7View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Klimmek F, Sjödin A, Noutsos C, Leister D, Jansson S: Abundantly and rarely expressed Lhc protein genes exhibit distinct regulation patterns in plants. Plant Physiol 2006, 140: 793–804. 10.1104/pp.105.073304View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Luciński R, Jackowski G: The structure, functions and degradation of pigment-binding proteins of photosystem II. Acta Biochim Pol 2006, 53: 693–708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Liu C, Zhang Y, Cao D: Structural and functional analysis of the antiparallel strands in the lumenal loop of the major light-harvesting chlorophyll a/b complex of photosystem II (LHCIIb) by site-directed mutagenesis. J of Biological Chemistry 2008, 283: 487–495.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Teramoto H, Ono T, Minagawa J: Identification of Lhcb gene family encoding the light harvesting chlorophyll a/b proteins of photosystem II in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Physiol 2001, 42: 849–856. 10.1093/pcp/pce115View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tokutsu R, Teramoto H, Takahashi Y, Ono T, Minagawa J: The light-harvesting complex of photosystem I in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii : protein composition, gene structures and phylogenic implications. Plant Cell Physiol 2004, 45: 138–145. 10.1093/pcp/pch013View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chu HA, Nguyen AP, Debus RJ: Amino Acid Residues That Influence the Binding of Manganese or Calcium to Photosystem II. 1. The Lumenal Interhelical Domains of the D1 Polypeptide. Biochemistry 1995, 34: 5839–5858. 10.1021/bi00017a016View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Tang XS, Diner BA, Larsen BS: Identification of histidine at the catalytic site of the photosynthetic oxygen evolving complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1994, 91: 704–708. 10.1073/pnas.91.2.704View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Magnuson A, Andreasson LE: Different manganese binding sites in Photosystem II probed by selective chemical modification of histidyl and carboxylic acid residues. Biochemistry 1997, 36: 3254–3261. 10.1021/bi962176cView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghirardi ML, Preston C, Seibert M: Use of a novel histidyl modifier to probe for residues on tris treated photosystem II membrane fragments that may bind functional manganese. Biochemistry 1998, 37: 13567–13574. 10.1021/bi980359oView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Makino A, Mae T, Ohira K: Photosynthesis and ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in rice leaves: changes in photosynthesis and enzymes involved in carbon assimilation from leaf development through senescence. Plant Physiology 1983, 73: 1002–1007. 10.1104/pp.73.4.1002View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. To KY, Suen DF, Grace-Chen SC: Molecular characterization of ribulose-1,5-bisph.osphate carboxylase/oxygenase activase in rice leaves. Planta 1999, 209: 66–76. 10.1007/s004250050607View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Portis AR: Rubisco activase – Rubisco's catalytic chaperone. Photosynth Res 2003, 75: 11–27. 10.1023/A:1022458108678View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Touchette BW, Burkholder JM: Overview of the physiological ecology of carbon metabolism in seagrasses. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 2000, 250: 169–205. 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00196-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gabai VL, Kabakov AE: Rise in heat shock protein level confers tolerance to energy deprivation. FEBS Lett 1993, 327: 247–250. 10.1016/0014-5793(93)80997-9View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Banti V, Loreti E, Novi G: Heat acclimation and cross-tolerance against anoxia in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ 2008, 31: 1029–1037. 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01816.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Downs CA, Heckathorn SA: The mitochondrial small heat shock protein protects NADH: ubiquinone oxidoreductase of the electron transport chain during heat stress in plants. FEBS lett 1998, 430: 246–250. 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)00669-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta RS: Phylogenetic analysis of the 90 KD heat shock family of protein sequences and an examination of the relationship among animals, plants, and fungi species. Mol Biol Evol 1995, 12: 1063–1073.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Lüders J, Demand J, Höhfeld J: The ubiquitin-related BAG-1 provides a link between the molecular chaperones Hsc70/Hsp70 and the proteasome. J Biol Chem 2000, 275: 4613–4617. 10.1074/jbc.275.7.4613View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Lin YZ, Chen HY, Kao R, Chang SP, Chang SJ, Lai EM: Proteomic analysis of rice defense response induced by probenazole. Phytochemistry 2008, 69: 715–728. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.09.005View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Baluska F, Hlavacka A, Samaj J, Palme K, Robinson DG, Matoh T, McCurdy DW, Menzel D, Volkmann D: F-actin-dependent endocytosis of cell wall pectins in meristematic root cells. Insights from brefeldin A-induced compartments. Plant Physiol 2002, 130: 422–431. 10.1104/pp.007526View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Starr DA, Han M: An Chors away: an actin based mechanism of nuclear positioning. J Cell Sci 2003, 116: 211–216. 10.1242/jcs.00248View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang SF, Hoffman NE: Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiology 1984, 35: 155–189. 10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  33. Heby O, Persson L: Molecular genetics of polyamine synthesis in eukaryotic cells. Trends in Biochemical Sci 1990, 15: 153–158. 10.1016/0968-0004(90)90216-XView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  34. Chen H, Xiong L: Pyridoxine is required for post-embryonic root development and tolerance to osmotic and oxidative stresses. Plant J 2005, 44: 396–408. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02538.xView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang H, Liu D, Liu C: The pyridoxal kinase gene TaPdxK from wheat complements vitamin B6 synthesis-defective Escherichia coli. J Plant Physiology 2004, 161: 1053–1060. 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.05.012View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Ehrenshaft M, Bilski P, Li M: A highly conserved sequence is a novel gene involved in de novo vitamin B6 biosynthesis. Microbiology 1999, 96: 9374–9378.Google Scholar
  37. Gallardo K, Job C, Groot SPC, Puype M, Demol H, Vandekerckhove J, Job D: Proteomic analysis of Arabidopsis seed germination of priming. Plant Physiol 2001, 126: 835–848. 10.1104/pp.126.2.835View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976, 72: 248–254. 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Candiano G, Bruschi M, Musante L, Santucci L, Ghiggeri GM, Carnemolla B, Orecchia P, Zardi L, Righetti PG: Blue silver: A very sensitive colloidal Coomassie G-250 staining for proteome analysis. Electrophoresis 2004, 25: 1327–1333. 10.1002/elps.200305844View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Gao JF: Measurement of chlorophyll content. In The guidance of plant physiology experiments. 1st edition. Edited by: Gao JF. Xi’an: Higher education press; 2006:74–76.Google Scholar
  41. Lilley RM, Walker DA: An improved spectrophotometric assay for ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase. Biochemica et biophysica Acta 1974, 358: 226–229. 10.1016/0005-2744(74)90274-5View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Vaughn KC, Lax AR, Duke SO: Polyphenol oxidase: The chloroplast oxidase with no established function. Physiol Plant 1988, 72: 659–665. 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1988.tb09180.xView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Hu et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.